The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Merge. However, since the article has not been merged as of yet (even when there was plenty of time to do so) the article will be redirected, and the information will be available through the history. Griffinofwales (talk) 00:04, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rerecording[change source]

Rerecording (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)

BarkingFish has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The complexity of this entry and its lack of Wikilinked entries makes this a wholly unsuitable entry for Simple Wikipedia. A native speaker of English would most likely have difficulty working out exactly what this article was referring to. Whilst I'm not a native English speaker, I have spoken English at a relatively proficient level for almost 16 years, and I personally, have difficulty getting my head round this entry. I doubt it could be simplified because it's hard to figure out what it's discussing in the first place. BarkingFish (talk) 11:19, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

Please have a look at my own opinion. ONaNcle (talk) 13:01, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Can you please tell us which opinion this is? Following the link I don't see anything related to this request...--Gordonrox24 | ^Talk 18:51, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Please find a better context here ONaNcle (talk) 23:53, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, so your vote is to delete. Gotcha. thanks. --Gordonrox24 | ^Talk 23:56, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support this as nominator. BarkingFish (talk) 14:37, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- You really don't need to put that here. Since you nominated the article, it's understood that you support its deletion. Either way (talk) 15:27, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - It's imho important to know nominator's opinion on this matter ; for instance, even I was the first (see history) to suggest this deletion, I'll carefully follow the debate during the next seven days before giving my public advice. ONaNcle (talk) 15:48, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    - Er...yes, it is important to know the nominator's opinion. Hence why the nominator gives a statement about why the article should be deleted. But there's no need to then place a "vote" in the discussion section as well. Either way (talk) 20:04, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is usually assumed that since you are nominating a page for deletion, you do want the page to be deleted, otherwise you wouldn't have nominated it.--Gordonrox24 | ^Talk 18:51, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Article doesn't provide the context necessary for understanding and is probably useless on its own. If Speedrun existed, then maybe I would have voted for keep. Chenzw Talk 15:37, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge into speedrun. Chenzw Talk 16:29, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I've already given my opinion but not my vote. I'll probably die without knowing the meaning of speedrun. But I'll certainly vote keep if this meaning is added on Simple before the end of the seven days. ONaNcle (talk) 07:26, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete content would be ok in a speedrun article should we get one.--Gordonrox24 | ^Talk 18:52, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I had no clue what rerecord was before I looked at this article, and I still don't know after. It should be put into speedrun - Egduf (talk) 16:22, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into speedrun. NotImportant (talk) 16:30, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Speedrun then tag the lot as ((Simplify)) and argue about ((QD))ing the whole concept (a4). 70.174.34.217 (talk) 06:04, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
QD A4 is applicable to articles about "people, groups, companies or websites that are not notable" and cannot be applied to articles concerned about a video game playthrough style/method. NotImportant (talk) 07:52, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Speedrun. PrincessofLlyr ^talk 14:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 11:19, 22 May 2011 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier due to WP:SNOW.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.