Former good articleOttoman Empire was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
On this day...Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 15, 2006Good article nomineeListed
May 4, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
August 7, 2007Good article reassessmentDelisted
December 17, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
February 1, 2012Peer reviewReviewed
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on October 29, 2004, October 29, 2005, and October 29, 2006.
Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive This article was on the Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive for the week of April 2, 2006.
Current status: Delisted good article

Double Dates?

[edit]

I see some editors are putting double dates in their edits- specifically, the Hijri year calendar. Is this against the Wikipedia rules of standard formatting, or is double dates in isolation (aka, in that specific line but nowhere else) fine?

The prime example I'm referring to is the second map of the Ottoman Empire in the infobox, below which has a description that refers to the Islamic Hijri calendar as well as the standard Western calendar date.

Crazynyancat (talk) 12:49 PM 4 June 2021 (PST)

Wiki Education assignment: Global History, 1500-Present

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 February 2024 and 24 April 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Phammywammy (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Lavenderluvr12 (talk) 22:41, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Insane amount of text more subheadings and remove text.

[edit]

Re.ove text has to be pared down from reading. 64.189.18.39 (talk) 07:21, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article issues and classification

[edit]
This article has multiple issues that apparently has just been ignored or maybe not addresses since content was incrementally added. The article is of interest to an amazing (to me) Twenty-seven WikiProjects.
I have reassessed the article on the reasoning that it does not pass the B-class criteria.

Tags

[edit]

See: Hidden categories

"Unsourced statements" from June 2011, "Failed verification" from September 2016, "citation needed" from July 2021, and "better sources needed" from April 2022. Article with "dead external links" from May 2024
There are other issues. Please see the "Section sizes" and the Anchor tag at the top of this page.

Relative B-class criteria

[edit]
a)- "Excessive detail",
b)- "Irrelevant content that is better placed in a different article" (or just cut down), and
3)- very possibly "Trivial content". Of particular relevant interest would be Wikipedia:Scope, Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, and Wikipedia:Too long; didn't read.

Bloat

[edit]
Aside from the enormous article bloat it extends to the optional appendices.
The "See also" section has eleven entries.
The "Further reading" section is enormously bloated. Under the heading is ((Main list|Bibliography of the Ottoman Empire)). All of these sections should contain minimum "summary" only content.
The "Further reading" section has the the unusual "General surveys" subsection with twenty-three entries, the "Early Ottomans" subsection with three entries, the "Diplomatic and military" subsection with twenty-one entries, the "Specialty studies" subsection with eleven entries, and the "Historiography" subsection with thirteen entries. Along with the four entries in the External links this is a total of an astounding 75 links. While possibly not a Wikipedia record the appendices seem to attempt to redefine "bloated".
The External links section follows the policies and guidelines of the External links.
[edit]
Lacking any local editor's involvement I will cut the "External links" section down to 3 or maybe 4 entries. The rationale for trimming (with dynamite) would be:
Normally I would just trim excessive links as uncontested maintenance and possibly move them here for any possible discussions, however, at this time I will just post the comments and see if anyone responds. Thanks in advance for any possible help. -- Otr500 (talk) 16:14, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]