GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Sega Technical Institute/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Indrian (talk · contribs) 18:40, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll tackle this one. Indrian (talk) 18:40, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I will say this does bring back some nostalgia. Thank you, Indrian. I look forward to your review and how I can make this article the best it can be. Red Phoenix talk 20:31, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Just like old times indeed! Lets get started.

History[edit]

That's about it. The article is well-written and pretty thorough. I think by adding in a little more information from the sources mentioned above we can just make it a little more comprehensive. Therefore, I will place this review  On hold while changes are made. Indrian (talk) 19:06, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quick question @Indrian: Since you are probably the most knowledgeable Sega person I know as it comes to accuracy, I have an important question about a "fact" I chose to leave out because I couldn't verify it and I was skeptical. This pertains to Nights into Dreams. As much credit as I give Ken Horowitz for the wealth of information he gives at his Sega-16 website that has helped in numerous articles, I have seen errors in his prose before and I have reason to be skeptical about a fact he gives in his article on STI. In it, he states that Naka returned to Japan at the end of 1994, but then came back a few months later and developed Nights at STI. This made, literally, zero sense to me - why would Naka return to the US when he was offered a producer spot at Sega CS3 and reunited with Ohshima, especially in light of his strong opinions on Sonic X-treme? The Nights article — a featured article, no less — states that Nights was developed in the US, but I read the source it's attributed to and it's nowhere to be found there. Nor is it in any past archives of that source. I spent hours trying to research this but could not find any sources that corroborate this. Might you have some insight into it? Red Phoenix talk 20:45, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Red Phoenix:Okay, that should just about do it. You may want to take another look at the shmuplations cite as stated above, but I feel comfortable promoting this thing to GA status right now. Well done! Indrian (talk) 14:35, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Ref idea[edit]

New Cerny interview: [1] Popcornfud (talk) 16:41, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]