The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 23:44, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chouettes Coquettes[edit]

Chouettes Coquettes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article appears to be entirely non-notable. Of the 7 references listed, 3 are dead, 3 don't mention the topic but instead are blogs or pages advertising gay life or sex workers and only one archived page mentions the group. There appear to be no current RS , so they may be defunct. Even if the group still exists, I can't see that they are any more notable than a local chess club or history society, and even many primary schools fail to make the notability cut. Bermicourt (talk) 22:40, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 23:47, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.