The result was Bizarre adventure. The AfD is being closed many years later, because it was never properly closed back then, because it was never visible, because it was never transcluded on any of the daily logpages. Technically, it has still been open this whole time.
Nobody else could ever be admitted here, because this door was made only for you. I am now going to shut it. jp×g 07:26, 18 October 2022 (UTC)(non-admin closure)[reply]
Reason Klm nair 01:32, 2 October 2006 (UTC) This information provided in this doesnt give any references to researchs or studies done for Caste.[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:50, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Poorly written article about non-notable computer programming software. --CFIF ☎ ⋐ 23:34, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Co-Creator Notice Hi, it's 'Matthew' from the Basic4GL Forum here, there seems to be some problems with the Basic4GL Wikipedia entry so I'm going to try and deal with them here if that's alright.
I only got involved in the 'Basic4GL Wikipedia entry project' Yesterday.
1.) I've removed the Tags beneath the Images which were directing people to the Basic4GL Site in order to Download Games created in Basic4GL.
2.) I'd forgotten to add the GFDL Copyright Tag to the 'Flymass' Image, this has been rectified.
3.) I've added a Link to the History of the BASIC Programming Language.
4.) Some of you have questioned the Importence of Basic4GL in the 'Realm' of Programming Languages, I'd just like to draw your attention to another BASIC programming Language which has a Site on Wikipedia FreeBasic. If FreeBasic has a Site then I really can't see why Basic4GL can't.
5.) Just discovered that BlitzBasic a Commercial version of the BASIC Programming Language is on Wikipedia, surely their Site reads more like an Advertisement than our's does. --Visi calc 13:19, 3 October 2006 (UTC) 'Matthew Basi4GL Forum' --Visi calc 19:24, 3 October 2006 (UTC) 'Updated by Matthew' — Visi calc (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Creator Before it was messed up and needed an expert so we are in the process of making the article better written so hang on! an also heres some stuff that might stop you thinking its non notible http://www.thefreecountry.com/compilers/basic.shtml http://forums.halodev.org/lofiversion/index.php?t561.html http://basic.mindteq.com/Details/Basic4GL.html http://www.klikforever.co.uk/tutorials.php?action=view&id=1 http://www.devmaster.net/forums/showthread.php?t=3303 http://www.gamedev.net/community/forums/topic.asp?topic_id=202166 --Madcow 14:36, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
To any one who wanted this delted becuase it was an advertisement. your reason tecnicaly is not vlid becuase all you had to do is add the advertisment template like so ((advertisment)) - --83.104.170.71 16:48, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
well looks like the editor has. --Madcow 22:21, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
The result was nomination withdrawn. Whispering(talk/c) 22:44, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Originally ((prod))ded as nn; prod tag was removed by possible SPA 71.203.231.148 with the edit summary "its not like they dont exist". Forgive me if I find that argument less than compelling, so on to a full-blown AfD we go. Subject is nn; article is a WP:OR violation written in a wildly unencyclopedic manner; roughly half the sentences contain WP:WEASEL violations; and not one word of it is properly cited besides the fact that the group exists at all. Also, while Wikipedia:Notability (comedy) is only a proposal at this point, I will note that this comedy troupe fails nine of the ten criteria currently listed, and for that tenth one it does pass, Wikipedia:Notability (comedy) suggests that the article name instead be used as a redirect to the name of the troupe's most prominent cast member and listed as a side project on his/her page. Needless to say, I think this adds up to a big old Delete. Aaron 00:12, 2 October 2006 (UTC) Changing my vote to weak keep based on Roninbk's excellent cleanup. I still don't think they meet the proposed comedy guidelines, but they're close enough. --Aaron 15:37, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Nufy8 00:46, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Does not seems to be Notable. Cannot find any Google references about the author or his book abakharev 00:38, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Nufy8 00:46, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non notable. No references for the book besides Wikipedia and its mirrors abakharev 00:41, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Nufy8 00:47, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. A local newspaper. Article does not reveal any circulation numbers or any sources that might substantiate notability. "Alexandra Chronicles" gets 34 Google hits, where one of them might possibly be relevant but probably not. ... discospinster talk 00:43, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Nufy8 00:48, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Subject does not meet WP:MUSIC with one self-produced album. Only 26 unique Google results and nothing on AllMusic. Prod tag removed. ... discospinster talk 00:45, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete Naconkantari 04:31, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is, at the moment, a non-notable law review. There are no substantial references in the article itself, and the 8 unique search results add nothing. It's rather ironic to nominate a law review for deletion -- you'd think that if this article has been generated by those involved, they would understand why this article is not acceptable for this project right now. Erechtheus 00:47, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete Naconkantari 04:32, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Violates WP:OR and WP:NOT a television schedule. Kirjtc2 00:53, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Nufy8 01:44, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Unnotable usenet poster. Fails WP:BIO. Similiar article deleted, see: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenneth Pangborn, but never had a full afd discussion. Thus, its shouldn't be speedied. If deleted, these pages should be protected from re-creation. Arbusto 01:01, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 05:37, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Article does not assert notablity per WP:WEB and things like criticism aren't sourced. In 2005 another afd voted keep many asking for clean up. Arbusto 01:14, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete Naconkantari 04:32, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non notable meme; crufty-licious WP:NEO --- RockMFR 01:21, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Punkmorten 22:57, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The subject of this article does not appear to meet the criteria of WP:BIO. Nothing notable turned up on google. Brimba 01:36, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. W.marsh 18:24, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete Naconkantari 04:33, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable model. There's no assertion of notability, it fails the Google test [4] and seems to be a vanity page. -→Buchanan-Hermit™/?! 01:51, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep Naconkantari 04:35, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable fan film. Delete as vanity. --InShaneee 02:01, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge into The World of Kong. --Keitei (talk) 21:24, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
To start with, most of those creatures are only mentioned in another encyclopedia (The World of Kong), which brings down questions of copyright. If we offer a free alternative, it is a significant threat to the sales of the book. I also have problems with the silly prose, the complete non-notability, and absolutely no hope of expansion (being that they only exist as entries in a fictional encyclopedia). Interrobamf 01:45, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
bibliomaniac15 02:55, 2 October 2006 (UTC) PS: By the way, the use of the paleobox in Vastatosaurus rex was allowed by the creator of the paleobox, Kazvorpal, when I asked him. Here's a link: User talk:Kazvorpal.[reply]
The result was Speedy delete. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 06:29, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Nomination for Deletion First afd was a speedy keep after no discussion due to an admin perception that the nomination was bad faith/inaccurate[5], though this was also disputed by another admin[6]. I basically agree that the first nom may have been by an inexperienced user who cited the wrong policy (WP:SOAP) in their nomination, and since there was no discussion whatsoever, I don't see the need to go through WP:DRV (though I'm open to suggestions otherwise). I am nominating this as a failure of WP:CORP, particularly bearing in mind that the official stance on acceptance criteria for corporate articles has recently hardened. (See "Corporate vanity policy enforcement" by Brad Patrick, General Counsel and Interim Executive Director of the Wikimedia Foundation). Patrick calls for a "shoot on sight" policy but given the mixup with the first afd, I decided to re-nominate. Initially I thought this company may be a specialist provider of traditional uniforms to Irish sports teams (possibly some notability if that was true), but it seems from the website that they actually just sell the usual range of t-shirts, hoodies and baseball caps for fans. Also, only about 50 google hits. In addition, the article appears to have been created by an employee of the company with a single purpose account Bwithh 02:00, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete Naconkantari 04:37, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Completing AfD started by anon, reason from change summary and my talk page: "This article can't possibly provide any useful information without either a) violating copyright or b) descending into non-NPOV fanboyism ("so-and-so is arguably deserving/not") All these Rolling Stone list pages have got to go. They're either stubs for ever or magnets for fanboy indignation. - Maggie --70.48.205.21" (I'm abstaining) Jamoche 02:04, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Whatever is done, SOME discussion of the all-time best guitarists is useful. Rolling Stone Magazine can be a source, without being the definitive list. But keep some listing of the greats. Tawn 06:06, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Nufy8 03:26, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This was nominated for deletion six months ago and kept with no consensus. However, there were some accusations of WP:POINT in that debate. I myself recommended a week keep then, but I've reconsidered since then. Google gives 46 unique hits, some of which still aren't reliable sources, and, aside from a couple of award nomination mentions (none actually won), there isn't much there. The award nomination mentions are well and good, but the problem is that they don't contribute too much to non-trivial third-party coverage (they're just lists). I do realize that CSD A7 has been recently expanded to include web content, and there is very little of notability claims in here as it stands (and any semblance of such is completely unsourced), but I guess that one could somewhat interpret the Red vs. Blue connection as a claim. So, given this and the past AfD and no consensus, I felt that it'd be better to send this to a debate first. — TKD::Talk 02:52, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --- Deville (Talk) 15:19, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
We have had vanity articles about people's pet animals. The title might suggest that this is one such but it is actually about the guy's sound system. Does not establish notability. -- RHaworth 02:59, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Nufy8 03:31, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:NFT; google has literally 0 hits Patstuart 03:09, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:52, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I do not think that voicing a character in a computer game is enough for notability abakharev 03:44, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:52, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A borderline case, but I feel this individual does not meet the criteria in WP:BIO. Perhaps later, but not now. Crystallina 03:53, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete, CSD A7 and office decree on promotional articles. Teke (talk) 04:57, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Warning to admins: This AfD is under attack, having been blanked by SPA 72.92.104.172 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) and replaced with the text "All guests are notable if you have even the tinest clue about the broadcasting industry, and there are no shameless plugs on this website. Everything here is accurate and truthful. Retards." --Aaron 17:38, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable web content. Not a speedy because of the guests section. Contested prod. MER-C 04:01, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedily deleted by Naconkantari under CSD G1. MER-C 06:09, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Absolute stupidity, nuff said. Danny Lilithborne 05:09, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete. -→Buchanan-Hermit™/?! 07:28, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Self-promoting advert with no evidence of meeting WP:CORP. — Tivedshambo (talk to me/look at me/ignore me) — 06:49, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. --- Deville (Talk) 15:23, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like 203.184.30.170 wanted this page deleted, but didn't tag it with ((subst:afd)). Anyway, it's an article about software that fails to assert notability. Delete. MER-C 09:30, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:53, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
1) uncommon term in academic literature, 2) resembles existing article Objective reality, 3) from the talk page, it is clear that this article is not being taken seriously by anyone -Shaggorama 08:18, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete a7 (web). NawlinWiki 16:41, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Page previously deleted (presumably via Prod) with title Mr. Mohawk. Now recreated with this title, so considered a contested prod. Title of comic plus Morelli (i.e. the author) gives 5 distinct Google hits, which is extremely low for a webcomic Fram 08:43, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:53, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I am not sure whether this is a simple hoax, or what. Certainly Prince William Augustus, Duke of Cumberland wasn't in any position to be killed in a duel with "Lord Richard Brown" in 1793 as he had died in 1765. William IV wasn't king in 1793, George III was. I'm not sure whether WP:NFT or WP:NOR applies here, but the article is not verifiable. I presume that the last sentence, about the long-lost Australian heirs, explains why this was written. Anyway, delete seems to be the answer to the problem. Angus McLellan (Talk) 08:53, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete. -- Steel 14:29, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Contested WP:PROD for webcomic with no signs of notability per WP:WEB (no reliable independent sources given). Delete. Kusma (討論) 08:56, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Transwiki Naconkantari 23:19, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A textbook case of Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information #7. This is a novelization of the various Half-Life games. It has no hope of being sourced to anything but observation of the games themselves (the linked refs are to a HL2 fansite), and the entire article is redundant to the plot summaries in the articles themselves.
We're not here to retell stories in less-compelling form; Valve has some games they'd like to sell you if you want to know what happens in the Half-Life series. Instead, Wikipedia has plot summaries to support encyclopedic overview of the fictional works as artefacts in the real world, and this article makes no effort whatsoever to do that. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 09:00, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Summary of events:
However, there is also a recommendation to make use of Wikibooks on topics such as this, as it has in Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince#Plot overview, for example. Coincidentally, there is also a "Half-Life Fact File" entry in Wikibooks, which is ideal for a transwiki merge/move of the plot summaries. With Wikibooks in mind, my Keep vote remains unchanged; but a Copy to WikiBooks vote is added as an alternate choice. ╫ 25 ◀RingADing▶ 15:11, 2 October 2006 (UTC) ╫[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:55, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non notable software. Sharpinstall gets 31 distinct Google hits. Claims to fame are unverified (sharpinstall + wix gives three pages, including WIkipedia and a letter by the creator of sharpinstall). Fails WP:V for the claims, fails WP:WEB and WP:CORP for the product. Fram 08:59, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. - Mailer Diablo 15:36, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No merit. When this article is deleted, this one needs to be deleted as well: THE THREE BOYS (noredirect). Michael Bednarek 09:59, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete. Robdurbar 10:29, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is little more than an advertisement for a self-styled "University". Final paragraph reads as if it comes from a brochure and is a good description of the business community in Geneva, but non-enlightening for a university. The official web site includes statements from former students, of a university that opened this year! Emeraude 09:16, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was SOMEWHAT SPEEDY KEEP (without prejudice against merging). We may not need a half-dozen lists, but it seems the best plan may be to merge or to resubmit a single problematic list for individual review. Nothing's getting deleted here, that much is obvious. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 10:38, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Very crufty. I'm fine with having one list of Pokemon, but do we really need six? After all, Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Also nominating:
In fact, the only major difference between most of these lists is that the pokemon are organized differently. --TBCTaLk?!? 09:21, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
№ | EN Name | JP Name | Romanization | Trademarked Rōmaji | Johto № | Hoenn № | Shinou № |
041 | Zubat | ズバット | Zubatto | Zubat | 37 | 63 | 28 |
The adding the types comment was to show how pointless the numbers are. Alone, they really aren't that important, so if we're going to remove those lists, I think the numbers should just be on the single pages. And just think how ugly it'll look with all of the blank spaces. Nemu 10:14, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:55, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't seem to meet WP:BIO. 743 ghits. Contested prod. MER-C 09:43, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete all, and I see I have some work cut out for me. --- Deville (Talk) 15:32, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Incomprehensible, cross-linked spamming related to anti-oil corporation agenda. Looks like it fails WP:NOTABILITY, WP:VANITY and WP:OR.
I am also nominating the following related pages because they are all just cross-links with the same basic content:
All articles created by User:S.Tychon, or one of five anonymous IPs: User:85.146.184.157, User:62.58.132.178, User:195.169.78.207, User:195.169.78.205 and User:137.120.3.224, who seem to be the same user. --DeLarge 10:24, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Signed: Stephan Tychon, Maastricht, Kingdom of the Netherlands. Gloabl energy dissident. (Tychon@dr.com)
<snip>Comments moved to talk page</snip>. Further conversations should be addressed there. That may halt the edit count on this page (38 from one named account and two related anonymous IP blocks in the last 48 hours). --DeLarge 13:33, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedily deleted by NawlinWiki (a7) - Yomanganitalk 12:21, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable blog. Nehwyn 10:37, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. DS 14:21, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
A blatant hoax article. No such MP, nor such a constituency. Really should be a speedy candidate but there are no criteria that fit. David | Talk 10:37, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedily deleted per WP:CSD A7 vanity; no notability shown in article. - Smerdis of Tlön 15:31, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable commercial website. Nehwyn 10:39, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. DS 14:20, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Part of a sequence of hoax articles and additions by User:Johnfox2007. There is no such cabinet post, see PM's list, and there is no such MP as John Fox, see the list accessible from here. No google hits for "Minister for Make Poverty History and Fair Trade" Mr Stephen 10:39, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Petros471 15:58, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I think this fails WP:BIO. Please note; I am not the author, though it appears this way. I split thsi article off Pinky Lee (same name different act!) after the originator had placed it there as well as the orginal guy. I will be notifing the original author of this AfD Fiddle Faddle 11:12, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep. feydey 10:07, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable, per WP:CORP. Prodded once and tag was removed, so I'm bringing it here. cholmes75 (chit chat) 11:22, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete as systematic hoax vandalism incited by Colbert that we have already deleted several times before. See also Briefsism (AfD discussion) (and again). Uncle G 13:12, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is possibly a non-notable group that assertability isn't noted, I'm not sure if this is even encyclopedic despite the Stephen Colbert reference. This is submitted for AFD anyway due to notability concerns. Vel ZAMAN 11:28, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to mistress (lover).--SB | T 04:04, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Previous speedy nomination as "empty" and "dicdef". Doesn't quite meet speedy criteria (see talk page). Converting to AFD for community consensus. — ERcheck (talk) 11:33, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Since the further reading is useful, merge these duplicate articles. Uncle G 13:04, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete a1, a3, no content. NawlinWiki 16:38, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Incomplete and hasn't been touched for two months Quentin X 11:51, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:56, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Article gives no indication of satisfiying WP:SOFTWARE, WP:V, or WP:RS Whispering(talk/c) 12:09, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:56, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Article gives no indication of satisfiying WP:SOFTWARE, WP:V, or WP:RS Whispering(talk/c) 12:16, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 04:56, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The article discusses Karna, a character in the Mahabharata. The article on Karna already exists in a much better form. Also there is no need to redirect as the name of this article is not as per manual of style.--Dwaipayan (talk) 12:19, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete. -→Buchanan-Hermit™/?! 16:29, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable per Wikipedia:Notability (music). --Amir E. Aharoni 12:21, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. -→Buchanan-Hermit™/?! 06:53, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Contested prod. Reason for prod was "No assertion of notability. Wikipedia is not the yellow pages." MER-C 12:45, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete, transwikied to Wiktionary. --Keitei (talk) 03:02, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This list comprises information on etymology, meaning and usage, and belongs better in a dictionary. I propose a transwiki merge into wiktionary:Appendix:Prefixes:English --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 13:14, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Petros471 15:58, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable art project, tagged for importance since August. No independent sources about its significance - if any. Mereda 13:17, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 05:08, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
non-notable, promotional Original research, not yet notable. Tom Harrison Talk 20:57, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete without prejudice towards recreation, provided the article is in a much better state. The article, as it stands, is completely beyond repair. I encourage those calling for this article to be kept and rewritten to do some research and write a new article on this topic.--SB | T 03:09, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
There are some concerns that this article might be a cut-and-paste of copyrighted content, see [21]. Additionally, the article seems to be a bit beyond the capabilities of Wiki cleanup. It is at best an essay or opinion piece with spiritual writings. Delete HappyCamper 14:30, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Blank as it does seem this article is not encyclopedia itself, however, since dietary requirements as part of a religion are acceptable in themselves (see Kashut), and I assume that Sikhism has something similar otherwise this article wouldn't exist, so it should have something in Wikipedia. Thus I can't support deletion without the intent to recreate it. Sikh-history I don't think you understand the problem with your article. You may wish to check the Kashut article for a better model. FrozenPurpleCube 15:02, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. W.marsh 16:18, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:CORP. ProD removed without real improvements. Article was created together with some links, which gave the impression of a Spam effort .Other chromatography companies with articles get a lot more results on Google and so on, indicating that the relative absence of Sielc is not caused by working in a specialized field, but by being only a minor player (for Wikipedia standards, that is). Fram 14:45, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 05:08, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Does not meet WP:Notability, discussion started HERE Bignole 14:51, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Punkmorten 22:54, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Does not meet WP:BIO -Nv8200p talk 15:33, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result wasarticle was speedily deleted by Tawker to allow original article to be moved back. Ekajati (yakity-yak) 20:36, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article is completely composed of bogus original research. Dakini is an important concept in Tibetan Buddhism, the author of this original research article has moved a properly researched (though not correctly cited) article to Dakini(Buddhism) to make way for this new age tripe. Ekajati (yakity-yak) 15:52, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep.. — CharlotteWebb 21:42, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable super-hero. Pkomano 16:01, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 05:09, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non notable term, see Wikipedia:Avoid neologisms. IronChris | (talk) 16:07, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Bobet 17:50, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable. (History: Proded by User:Salad Days on Sept 25: "No notability offered, no games appear to use this "engine". Removed by User:80.152.5.244 without comment. Salad Days tried to reprod it for the same reason, but User:Petri Krohn removed this as you can't readd a prod.) --Karnesky 16:09, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. I admit that this is borderline, and that the original article was primarily intended for self-promotion. However, it has since been rewritten, and as such the arguments from the original AFD, for the most part, do not apply. By extension, a comment made prior to said rewrite is used as the primary basis for deletion, and it is equally inapplicable.--SB | T 02:43, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article was originally deleted through this AfD. A DRV consensus decided to overturn the deletion and relist for new consideration. While everyone admired the thoroughness and thoughtful of the previous AfD's closer, consensus held that WP:SPAs had unduly influenced the debate, and that the course of discussion might have changed near the end of the debate. Please consult both the previous AfD and the DRV before commenting here. This debate will be semiprotected to curb spamming. This is a procedural relisting, so I abstain. Xoloz 16:33, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
*Neutral pending Alanyst's rewrite. --Aaron 18:07, 2 October 2006 (UTC) Voting below after Alanyst's rewrite.[reply]
The result was keep, without prejiduce to any further modifications. Creating an article on the series as opposed to having individual articles on each game is an editorial decision, and outside the scope of this AFD.--SB | T 02:16, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The article does not make a claim as to the notability of the subject. It is also linkless. Vectro 16:46, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. There are good arguments both ways here — on the one hand, the band fails our usual standards for inclusion. However, there is evidence of significance that would nullify those concerns. As such, there is no consensus that this article should be deleted.--SB | T 02:10, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Apparently non-notable Finnish band. No record deal, and they don't even do live music. Instead their music is only available on the Internet. The original Finnish article was nominated for deletion, and the result was evenly matched between keep and delete. I don't think this is notable enough even within Finland, let alone outside it. Delete. JIP | Talk 16:51, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy keep. The nominator has reverted to the prior version of the article and withdrawn the nomination. Uncle G 17:34, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:WEBSpeedy keep. Looking through the edit history, I now realize this is a football article that was vandalized early in its history. Whoops... --- RockMFR 17:06, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. - Bobet 17:47, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Seems to be a directory entry with nothing to say of note. I do not know if the restaurant has any notability (perhaps in the US it has), but in any case it would be more appropriate to merge in to the article about the owner (Rick Bayless) - assuming he himself is worthy of inclusion. Emeraude 17:08, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 05:09, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable political activist. Fails WP:Bio. Catchpole 17:13, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete per G11 (spam). -→Buchanan-Hermit™/?! 06:40, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 05:29, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Here we go again. This article is about a mall which (the article does not say but my oh so fantastic research shows) is in Olean, New York. You can find its website here and convince yourself that this does not belong on Wikipedia. No reliable third party coverage, no hope of ever being more than a directory of shops in the mall, no apparent sign that this mall has any significance beyond the service it provides to the local community, nowhere close to meeting WP:CORP. Pascal.Tesson 21:01, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete – Gurch 01:29, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
if we indeed use the criteria mentioned in this entry (wrote papers, lead group of people, was an editor) we would have to include all professors of meteorology and numerous editors of journals - thousands of meteorologists. I think that we need more (perhaps Carl-Gustaf Rossby Research Medal) or Charney Award for living meteorologists? Pflatau 20:11, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
delete (or make entry stronger) Pflatau 20:15, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
delete - currently fails the average professor test. Thryduulf 15:21, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Delete pschemp | talk 23:55, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Article is very small and has very little relevance to the Hannibal canon. It is not linked from any other page and has only two categories. He isn't notable enough to feature his own article and his entire character could very easily be summarized in the Silence of the Lambs article.--CyberGhostface 17:37, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. --- Deville (Talk) 15:48, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Nom & vote ...
Del: John Denver's syrupy tribute notwithstanding, i am pro-WV. But he appears n-n, in heading one of 6 state institutions labeled as "universities" in a state with 0.6% of the US population, 50th in median income, and presumably not an exciting academic system. Did i mention his notability is not asserted, let alone described?
--Jerzy•t 17:29, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete. theProject 17:16, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Not a notable games company. Speedy delete (it's a repost) was both deleted and later contested, probably by the same person under a different user name. Google gives very few hits when searching for founder's name + company name [23] [24]. A search for Pg games gives 9,440 hits, but most seem irrelevant. Further claims the article "provides a unique insight into the game making theory and philosophy behind pg games", but it's just a list of home made games. - TexMurphy 17:34, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Bobet 17:44, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Prod removed without comment. Promotion for a website that, per the article, "benefits causes, charities and fundraising efforts worldwide." Per the site itself, it's a social networking site where people may engage in fundraising activities. Either way, it generates zero relevant google hits and no ranking on Alexa. Totally fails WP:WEB. -- Fan-1967 17:38, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. — CharlotteWebb 18:55, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Vanity article for a non-notable fake country. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FairHair (talk • contribs)
The result was keep. - Bobet 17:42, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hm. Well, I don't want to use this word, but I'm not sure how else to describe it. Original research. Perhaps some of the summaries of the "extracanonical" works can be incorporated elsewhere? -- Merope Talk 17:46, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 05:29, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
((db-context)) tag removed, so I'm bringing it here. Single-line article with no assertion of notability. Aaron 17:50, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 05:29, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neologism. Contested prod. -- Merope Talk 17:57, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep, there are nontrivial works discussing her art. --- Deville (Talk) 17:12, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't pass WP:BIO, the first book has no mention of her in its author list on worldcat and the second doesn't seem to exist at all. Would say delete as non-notable. Localzuk(talk) 18:04, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect while deleting the history, since the content doesn't have anything to do with the reason of the redirect. - Bobet 17:40, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The fictional religion is dealt with in the article on Cthulhu; the real-world organization seems to lack notability. See Talk:Cult of Cthulhu Nareek 17:59, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Keep per WP:SNOW; no votes to delete other than nom and (possibly confused or insulted) article author. NawlinWiki 15:40, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
nn group--ITY 18:14, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy keep. -→Buchanan-Hermit™/?! 00:43, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
non-notable company Andy Andy 18:17, 2 October 2006 (UTC) — Andy Andy (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
The result was delete. Redirect is optional. - Mailer Diablo 05:30, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Definitely a crystal ball. Angelo 18:24, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 05:40, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NOT Arutdy 19:16, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 05:31, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yahoo!, Google, et. al started NEAR this building, not IN it. [29] Presumably this also holds true for 284 Hamilton and 286 Hamiliton, but we don't have articles about them. Stev0 19:18, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 05:31, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The article looks like self-promotion; I think it is far from meeting the criteria at WP:Music. A google search for " Hate the Player, Not the Gameboy" has a single hit, at myspace. (contested prod; original author was user:Laromlab). Aleph-4 19:45, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 05:31, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable local politician. Fails to satisfy WP:BIO. Valrith 19:45, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep and merge Stress (original band) into it. The current article was cut and pasted from the 'original band' article so I'm merging the histories too. At one point, the articles weren't about the same band, but there's really not enough content in the history to start an article about the other band (it would get deleted under csd a7). - Bobet 17:30, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Addendum: the discussion was transcluded at both the october 2 and october 4 pages. If you have a problem with me closing it early, leave me a comment, thanks. - Bobet 17:37, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is an article about a band which released, according to the article, one LP, one single and one 12"; a CD of their back catalogue has since been produced. It does not appear that their releases were on a major label, as failure to be signed by a major label was cited as the reason for the band folding. The article was very spammy, I cleaned it a bit. I do not see any credible assertion of notability, but it may be that Someone Out There knows of some additional data which will establish the importance of the group.
This nomination was originally closed out of process after no input by User:Parsssseltongue, citing bad faith nomination" (no evidence appears to have been advanced to support this assertion) and has been relisted following a debate at deletion review. Guy 16:08, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete per WP:CSD general criteria #1 (patent nonsense). Wikipedia is not a place to promote schoolboy nonsense, please see WP:NFT. Gwernol 21:17, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:((subst:spa|username)) ; suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)) ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)) . |
i dont think it's a hoaxbut it may be a joke Kowlse 20:11, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was flagged as copyvio. MER-C 02:45, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Clearly an advert for a magazine, apparently (from use of 'we') written by the magazine or its staff; biased POV issues, and external links to biased POV magazines. Additionally, not wikified, full of grammar errors. Emeraude 20:22, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge. Petros471 10:18, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
These plays are not usually called "The War of the Roses," and, in fact, simply consist of all Shakespeare's English history plays save King John. This subject is already dealt with at Shakespearean history, although that article should be improved. john k 20:23, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy Delete per CSD A6. --Nishkid64 21:01, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Page is nothing more than an attack page for a user at Wikipedia. Not to mention that it violates WP:BIO and WP:BLP. Request speedy delete. Ramsquire 20:44, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. --- Deville (Talk) 17:18, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Article about a corporation that shows no evidence of satisfying WP:CORP. Appears to be company doing self-promotion (WP:SPAM). Twice deleted for expired WP:PROD, once deleted for copyright violation, I'd suggest that if the result of this discussion is a Delete, that this article be Protected from recreation. Valrith 20:49, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy deleted per CSD:G11 (blatant advertising)
Appears to be no more than a publicity puff for the company. Emeraude 20:54, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 05:42, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The subject of the article fails WP:NPOV--it is an attempt to correlate parts of the Qur'ān with the current paradigm of scientific thought. Fails WP:OR as well. It is interesting, certainly, but it does not belong in an encyclopedia. If it can be salvaged, I'm all for it--however, I think the idea of selectively correlating parts of a text (while ignoring those bits that don't correspond well) cannot adhere to NPOV. -- Merope Talk 21:03, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I have changed my mind regarding the article. I believe that, should it implement reliable sources and address both aspects of the issue (as Science and the Bible does), it will be an excellent and interesting contribution to the project. It will have to be developed beyond the collection of quotes it currently hosts, but I no longer believe it is a candidate for deletion. Keep. -- Merope Talk 14:08, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Can you please delete it. I will try to work on it at my user space and will post it back after making it much mature. I will try to give both sides view and everything will have reference. At the moment they have started an edit war and adding their own comments. For example -- Ant cannot speak "ARABIC" (just 100% their own comments - like talk page). I already have much less time to work on the article and cannot afford it at the moment. Can some guide me that how can this article be deleted? Danke schoen!--- ابراهيم 08:44, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As it stands, this article needs a lot of work, however, in principle, I can't find a reason to object to it other than it will be difficult to do properly. However, it is not necessarily impossible to do so, and I'd prefer to wait at least a month, see if it gets anywhere close to the Bible article. FrozenPurpleCube 02:03, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 05:48, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Profile of candidate to US congress election Nehwyn 21:48, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Sonny Corinthos. Tizio, Caio, Sempronio 11:15, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article is a duplicate of an already existing article for Sonny Corinthos.--Bookworm857158367 21:46, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. — TKD::Talk 07:35, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
(({Notability not asserted))} Igbogirl 21:59, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Prominent journalist on the UKs biggest paper- as such, very notable. Keep. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rob77 (talk • contribs) .
The result was merge and redirect to Dax (Star Trek) --- Deville (Talk) 17:23, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Completing incomplete nomination by User:206.107.220.149. Had been prodded by User:12.75.0.155 with reason "insignificant non-character in movie". Merge or redirect to Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country. TimBentley (talk) 21:39, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was should-have-been-speedy keep, due to lack of nominator/rationale. — CharlotteWebb 21:51, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Completing incomplete nomination by User:Legolost. Keep, see no reason to delete. It's got a couple of red links, so it's not a copy of the category. TimBentley (talk) 21:45, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 05:49, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Completing incomplete nomination by User:DeleteF10. I don't know what the reason for deletion might be. TimBentley (talk) 21:48, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep and move to "List of..." form. — CharlotteWebb 21:54, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Completing incomplete nomination by User:Siddiqui. We have List of official United States national symbols and National symbols of Canada, so I don't know why this should be deleted. Merging would be preferable to deletion regardless. TimBentley (talk) 21:54, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy keep. Malformed and pointless nomination by an anonymous contributor. Please re-list with an explanation if you believe this article should be deleted. RFerreira 22:52, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Completing incomplete nomination by User:61.17.22.93. Keep, seems as notable as other schools. TimBentley (talk) 21:57, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 05:45, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Completing incomplete nomination by User:219.90.96.141 (probably User:Tanksingh).
The result was no consensus, neither of the arguments for deletion are appropriate. The first (nom) is a completely invalid reason, the second so vague as to not be useful. If someone can come up with a valid and even slightly detailed reason for deletion in the future, send this back up in a few weeks. --- Deville (Talk) 17:30, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Only popular in Brazil. Ragnarok Addict 22:42, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete. -→Buchanan-Hermit™/?! 00:39, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
One specific course in one high school is not notable or encyclopedic. Probably speedy deletion, but I'll err on the side of caution and say: delete. Aecis I'm too busy acting like I'm not naive 22:45, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 05:54, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Recreated after being speedily deleted under G11, so technically contested and in need of AfD debate. But really, can't we just WP:SNOW this spam?? Leuko 22:47, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was kept, and moved to knot density. DS 20:12, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see how this article about something that's not very important can be expanded any further. Joiz. A. Shmo 22:54, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep per "Redirects should not be deleted simply because they do not have any incoming links. Please do not list this as a reason to delete a redirect". Daniel.Bryant 02:07, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing links here Palfrey 22:56, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. DS 21:10, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Non notable, fails google test Palfrey 22:59, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. - Bobet 17:15, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article is apparent WP:OR with no potential references found via search -- zero hits for the title search terms. The creator defends the inclusion of this article on the basis that Hypocoristics for Spanish names exists and suggests that removal would exhibit anti-Dutch bias. It's not my intent to be anti-Dutch, but I'm pro-project-policy. Erechtheus 23:16, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 05:56, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This person is non-notable -- according to IMDB, he has had only one minor film appearance (so far) as "Teenage Passenger" in the 2005 movie, Reversal of Fortune. That role appears 25th on IMDB's list of credits for this movie. Google generates only 9 unique hits, all unrelated, for "David Zelenski", and 14 unique hits for "Dave Zelenski", some related, some un-related. Hopefully for his sake, he'll go on to have a great career and look back and laugh at us for our folly, but for now I just don't think this article is justified. (Note: I previously nominated this article for deletion using the PROD process). --A. B. 23:35, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 05:55, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Seems to be non-notable. Google can't find any independent reviews required by WP:MUSIC, as well as only one self-produced album. Contested speedy/recreated. Leuko 23:28, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 05:55, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:((subst:spa|username)) ; suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)) ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)) . |
This is a non-notable individual Church location. The 56 unique search hits do nothing to augment notability. Deprodded. Erechtheus 23:31, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 05:56, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is a non-notable nickname for the residents of a dorm. The 34 unique search hits do nothing to augment notability. Erechtheus 23:40, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 05:56, 7 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No sign of notability given. Prod removed twice. Google garners 20 hits for "Julia Oberon" [34]. IrishGuy talk 23:45, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]