- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:06, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Meir Kahane.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Jbarta (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Apparently replaceable fair use by an image of the same name on Commons: c:File:Meir Kahane.jpg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 04:40, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- This is the image the world knows of Meir Kahane, not the one on Commons. The file on commons, I don't even know if that is the same person. In any case it is not representative of him. If anything, the file on commons is the one that should be deleted or renamed. Debresser (talk) 09:56, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- I have tagged the file on Commons for rename. Debresser (talk) 10:05, 1 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Since the file on Commons has now been renamed to File:Meir Kahane Tikvah Canarsie.jpg, I propose to close this discussion as no longer relevant. Debresser (talk) 10:49, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- It is not replaceable, since the picture on commons is not at all representative of this person. Debresser (talk) 22:52, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. There's something weird going on with this image - the image at the biographical article is the generally accepted image but when I click on it (that More info option?) the link then brings me to the Canarsie version. It's late where I am otherwise I might be able to figure it out... Shearonink (talk) 06:34, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- That is because the image on Commons was moved with a redirect, instead of deleting the original name which made this whole mess. Debresser (talk) 19:29, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- It is not replaceable, since the picture on commons is not at all representative of this person. Debresser (talk) 22:52, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- It is obviously replaceable, as the term is used in our global NFC policy. A subjective opinion that an image is "not representative" is not sufficient to establish an exception to the replaqceability standard. A photo of Kahane as an infant would surely not be an appropriate identifying image, nor would one showing him from behind, but a free image is not unacceptable merely because it dates to a period beofre the subject's greatest prominence/notoriety. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 18:11, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- It is when the person is not recognizable. As I said before, "I don't even know if that is the same person". Other claim it is, but that doesn't detract from the fact that he is not recognizable. There are more than picture from the time he was famous, but this one dates from before that. Debresser (talk) 19:29, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- That you claim not to recognize him is irrelevant. Look here [1]. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 04:05, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Of course that is not irrelevant. If I don't recognize him, so won't a lot more people. It is really very simple: that Commons picture is unfit for illustrative purposes of this person. Debresser (talk) 07:04, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
File:Martha Rockwell cross-country skier ca 1970.jpg
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:02, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Martha Rockwell cross-country skier ca 1970.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)
Fails NFCC#1, as a replaceable nonfree image of a living person. Fails NFCC#4 as previously unpublished. Fails NFCC#8, since we do not need an image of an athlete skiing to convey the fact that they were a skier, The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 15:28, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not only replaceable but replaced; the article already contains a free licensed image. Seraphimblade Talk to me 16:10, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Retain, The concerns I see here are regarding:
- NFCC#1 "Non-free content is used only where no free equivalent is available, or could be created, that would serve the same encyclopedic purpose." Here the encyclopedic purpose is to show the equipment, snow grooming and style of skiing prevalent when Rockwell was a competitor. (Update: I've expanded the rationale to explain this in detail at File:Martha Rockwell cross-country skier ca 1970.jpg. HopsonRoad (talk) 14:11, 9 August 2019 (UTC))[reply]
- NFCC#4 "Non-free content must be a work which has been published or publicly displayed outside Wikipedia by (or with permission from) the copyright holder..." The image was (and still is) displayed in a sports shop with the permission of the copyright holder.
- NFCC#8 "Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding." Cross-country skiing today and the attendant imagery is much different, today, than depicted. I haven't found images of women cross-country skiing from this era, since the US team was newly formed at the time. This is a period of cross-country skiing with very few images of any sort to illustrate the state of the sport at the time.
- HopsonRoad (talk) 23:18, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
