![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 70 | ← | Archive 74 | Archive 75 | Archive 76 | Archive 77 | Archive 78 | → | Archive 80 |
has fought 2 times on KSW biggest MMA in Europe and will fight a third time on KSW in september 15 2012. KSW i the biggest show in Europe and is a top tier show which attracts millions on television and up to 15000 live gate. As well as fighting 2 UFC fighters beating one by TKO and loosing to win by decision on the UKs biggest MMA show cage Rage -77.86.31.2 (talk) 04:51, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
I am a first time writer on wikipedia, and was making this page about Tazylor Bradley as i saw that this was not made already, i was seeing if i was doing it right, and putting the right things in then u deleted page.... thats not right... and its unfair -Buzzybee41 (talk) 10:46, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Did any discussion of this deletion happen anywhere? This was the main image of an important page not so long before it was deleted, if not at the time it was deleted.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 21:56, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
I believe the file is in the public domain for the same reason as found on this page for a similar file. I'm not used to dealing with these copyright issues, but one file seems as valid as the other in this case, as Wu Jianquan died in 1942. The file was originally deleted because it's copyright was in question. -InferKNOX (talk) 20:24, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
I believe the file is in the public domain for the same reason as found on this page for a similar file. I'm not used to dealing with these copyright issues, but one file seems as valid as the other in this case, as Yang Luchan died in 1872. The file was originally deleted because it's copyright was in question. -InferKNOX (talk) 20:13, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Deletion based on episode "notability" is arbitrary. Why was this one episode deleted while all others are left up? The summaries are useful to many people, even if you yourself aren't a fan of the show (and so don't find it noteworthy.) -108.35.176.248 (talk) 22:26, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
This image was deleted in Commons because BBC logo (File:BBC.svg) may still be unfree in UK. -George Ho (talk) 05:28, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
CustomShow has the unique ability to allow presentations with video and flash to play on the iPad -Jslev04 (talk) 13:50, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
is referred to repeatedly in articles regarding Mormonism as a critic -70.176.240.39 (talk) 20:09, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
The article was previously deleted pursuant to AfD. Article was nominated in August of 2012 by an editor with only one edit (obviously done for the sole purpose of RfD). Regardless, it went through the process and was deleted as it was "not notable" by consensus. I recreated the article and removed all of the fluff from the original article. I also went through each reference (added additional and removed some that were not even pointing to the correct information) and resourced the article to establish the notability. I then left a note on the talk page of the article after I placed it in the main space. The note stated what I am stating here; however, it was nominated for speedy deletion and then deleted a short time later as it was "essentially duplicates article deleted last month over notability issues." The only thing that is the same is the name of the article. Would appreciate a little warmer welcome as I did a lot of work to show notability for an article and it was speedily deleted without (IMO) anyone even looking at the talk page. Take the article to RfD and let it pass the test (as I know that the person is notable), but speedy deletion does not make sense. Also wondering how the editor making the recommendation could make the recommendation based on it being similar to the articles since there is no article to compare it with. I know that it is different as I have a copy of the that article. -HappyTwoBEE (talk) 16:47, 11 September 2012 (UTC) --HappyTwoBEE (talk) 16:47, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for the information. I guess I am in the wrong forum and apologize for such. I understand perfectly and would welcome a hard look at the new article. I fully understand that Wikipedia is not to be used for promotion or spam and any article reading like an Advert will be subject to speedy deletion and/or RfD. That is why the article was completely re-written, all of the new sources were researched and cited properly. Thank you again for the review and the information and I will make sure to take it to the proper forum. --HappyTwoBEE (talk) 12:45, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
reasoning -Scudcrow (talk) 15:01, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
I've added the correct source information, but the image has still been targeted for deletion. More details about the error can be found on (including the appropriate source info): http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:VHS-oldbldg.gif
Please help me fix this.
Regards, K
Thanks for getting back to me on this. An Alumnus had scanned the picture and uploaded it to vidyaranyaschool.com. The photo was taken in 1984 by an unknown source (probably another alumnus). Hence, the scanned photo is the property of vidyaranyaschool.com. How can I prevent the image from being deleted (can I enter more detailed information elsewhere?). Regards, K
reasoning -Dee1957 (talk) 16:17, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
A page with this title has previously been deleted. If you are creating a new page with different content, please continue. If you are recreating a page similar to the previously deleted page, or are unsure, please first contact the deleting administrator using the information provided below. 00:01, 10 January 2011 Kuru (talk | contribs) deleted page Colin Campbell (actor) (G3: Blatant hoax)
Why has my father's name been deleted as G3?
Colin Campbell (20 March 1883-25 March 1966) was a Scottish film and television character actor who is known for his roles in the films Tillie's Tomato Surprise, Nothing But the Truth, The Girl from Nowhere, A Man of Stone, The White Monkey, Big Boy, Eight Girls in a Boat, Wallaby Jim of the Islands, The Secret of Treasure Island and The Lost World.
That Allmovie article is thoroughly confused. It gives the dates, 1883-1966, of the one we had an article on, Colin Campbell (I) in IMDb, but not only is the filmography a mish-mash, the actual capsule bio says "The best-remembered of his Selig directorial efforts was 1914's The Spoilers", and that was Colin Campbell (IV) (1859–1928). Maybe there just aren't the sources to write articles about these early days; but I'd have thought, on balance, we are better off with than without the deleted article on CC(I), given that the IMDb records are at least internally consistent and for somebody long dead like that no-one has an incentive to falsify them. I might drop a note to Wikipedia:WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers and see if anyone is interested.
I have explained things to the enquirer here. JohnCD (talk) 22:27, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
AppIt Ventures is a recently formed LLC based in Denver, CO. It offers both B2B and B2C services and products in the field of software development. AppIt Ventures has a website at www.appitventures.com, as well as Facebook, Twitter, Linkedin, and YouTube profiles. All information regarding AppIt Ventures to be posted on Wikipedia will be necessarily unbiased, factual, and verifiable. The Wikikpedia page for this topic was deleted under code #A7; please undelete for continued revision including the addition of more information and input of reliable sources. -Brandy R Anderson (talk) 21:43, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
Please undelete the full history of Talk:List of shopping malls by country (deleted 2007 per CSD#G8), and redirect to Talk:List of shopping malls, thus matching the redirect List of shopping malls by country.
I'm expecting to find in it history, referenced by Talk:List_of_shopping_malls_in_the_United_States#Note_to_all_editors, a pre-2006 significant history of debates over what should be in these lists. The old debates may help inform the ongoing discussions at the bottom of Talk:List_of_shopping_malls_in_the_United_States. -SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:55, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
This page was deleted while it was work in progress and I would like to request that it's content be userfied. I still need to add references and fine tune the text of the article, which I didn't have time to do as it has been deleted while I was actually working on it. If you can track the history of that page, you will notice that it was discussed in the chat with an admin, that I got feedback on it, did some changes and had some more to do. Thank you (Yvancg (talk) 07:46, 11 September 2012 (UTC))
Thank you for your reply and for the clarification. Please do proceed with the userfication. At least that would allow me to recover the time and efforts I have put into for for some other use may be. Meanwhile I will take a closer look at the link you mentioned. At the moment my main concern it to get my work back, as i didn't get a chance to save a copy locally. Thank you for your help. (Yvancg (talk) 06:14, 12 September 2012 (UTC))
Thank you for that. I will keep it userfied until it meets the notability standards your sent me. I trust it is not risking deletion if it isa only userfied, correct? (58.11.134.158 (talk) 09:33, 14 September 2012 (UTC))
reasoning -Sumon Rahman 14:42, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello Admin,
Please accept my apologizes if I did anything wrong with the last page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hipsters_com
Actually It is a Social Networking website released in this month. I believe that we should let people know that they got a new social networking site to stay tuned with their fnf. www.Hipsters.com is a social site like Pinterest.
So I'm highly requesting to you please stop the page deletion.
Looking for your soonest reply.
Sincerely Sumon
The user Dennis Brown restored the article to a re-direct page because that was how it was left after a previous "Article of Deletion" discussion. That previous discussion ignored many good points made on the side of keeping the article and made it a re-direct page anyway. Instead of going through the proper channels to undelete the page, an anonymous user undid the original revertion to a redirect page and started updating the page regularly. Since these new changes were not the correct wiki etiquette, Dennis Brown felt it necessary to revert the article to its previous "official" status as a re-direct page. His own comment directed me to this "request for undeletion" page to apply for undeletion, even though I am not sure if it is the correct channel to go through. Now, as to why the article should be undeleted. The Chris Gethard Show is a television show that is very quickly gaining notoriety among a general audience and among several notable public figures, as outlined in the new sources provided by the user Phanink. It is one of the most significant things Chris Gethard has done, and is a webshow currently being aired weekly so it is very relevant and is constantly being updated with new episodes and new notable public figures who have appeared on the show. It deserves its own space since it is a much larger entity and involves many more people than Chris Gethard himself relates to in his "notable" life events as accounted on his Wiki page. The show should not be simply redirected to his page. -Dr Clocktopus (talk) 15:38, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
Can an admin please restore old revisions of this page and sxephil, I am looking for further information that we can add to the article. -Alizaa2 (talk) 18:25, 15 September 2012 (UTC)
this is our company history page so no idea why someone else deleted it. Please undelete so we can update -84.92.151.194 (talk) 17:11, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
re-establishing article with new material and supported claims of notability -Spidey111 (talk) 03:40, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
reasoning -Vajpai 04:03, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
May kindly look in to the issue of deletion of Climate Himalaya page. We at Climate Himalaya, a voluntary initiative working in Himalayan region on awareness generation and advocacy are not funded from any source and therefore any of our efforts are voluntary, and for social cause. We also are not a company or business that has any financial interest by advertising us at wikipedia. As ICIMOD (that has a page at wikipedia) we are similar kind of organization growing and working for mountain development.
We look forward for our request to be heard with utmost seriousness.
Warm regards
K N Vajpai Convener Climate Himalaya www.chimalaya.org
personal review -Stillwaterising (talk) 12:22, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
Please email to me. Thanks. - Stillwaterising (talk) 12:22, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
So I and others can read about it when looking it up, while not the most popular device being able to read about low-end phones can still be useful. Nokia is not a small or unknown company, and this product is sold in a great many places. -123.243.172.144 (talk) 13:13, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
The page is not the promotion I will review the contents -Khalid Saeed Khan (talk) 07:40, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
I will rewrite this article. and remove the material as per direction.
I am a member of the Phi Society fraternity at the University of Virginia, and for the past two years I have been updating and maintaining the wikipedia page. I have just found out that the wikipedia page has been deleted/redirected, and I am not sure why. The wikipedia page is important to our fraternity because it not only allows new students at the University of Virginia to learn about our history, but it also is a source of reference for current brothers and alumni. The Phi Society page has been deleted and now when you search "Phi Society" it redirects to the Phi Delta Theta fraternity page. This not only causes confusion among University of Virginia students who wish to learn the difference between the Phi Society fraternity and the Phi Delta Theta chapter at the University, but it also undermines the importance of the Phi Society as a fraternal organization. The Phi Society has a rich history and importance at the University of Virginia, and by taking down the wikipedia page, the fraternity is unable to demonstrate its importance in student life at the University, and its right to be a part of the Inter-Fraternity Council. If the page was redirected or deleted because of copy right issues then we will be happy to make whatever changes are necessary to maintain the wikipedia page. I am not entirely skilled in the use of wikipedia, but the last thing I want to see (and the last thing my other 48 fraternity brothers want to see) is the deletion of Phi Society from wikipedia. We do not want our existence to be written off as insignificant. I hope this is understandable, and will be taken into account. Thank you -Henrykittredge (talk) 08:21, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
added several citations prior to deletion, thou never discussed and now MARTA and Jacksonville seriously considering (1 of 2 potentials for both) [2] to add. -Marketdiamond (talk) 10:14, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted by incompetent admin, plenty of additional sources available, problem presumably caused by admin in question acting well outside his area of knowledge. Searching for the full form, or abbreviated form of the name "Q3F" returns many many sources with which the article could be updated. Admins argument for deletion that search for additional information resulted in insufficient coverage is clearly completely false. Lack of knowledge on a subject and/or inability to use basic web tools like Google to search for additional coverage is not a valid reason for deletion. -213.235.49.210 (talk) 09:29, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
reasoning -2.101.176.194 (talk) 11:36, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
reasoning -94.43.121.53 (talk) 19:40, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
Someone called Armagedonic has deleted the page: List of atheists in science and technology, evidently out of the reasons of religious intolerance.
Please help me to restore the page.
Thank you very much.
reasoning -204.16.64.3 (talk) 21:20, 19 September 2012 (UTC) I'm tempted to flat out delete the request as no reason for it was given (and it was from an IP and it was for an article on a non-notable quack, as the AfD which got overwhelming support makes clear.
I've been working on the Hockey World Cup articles and I want to create a page for the upcoming edition. Want to see what there is to work from in the deleted page. --Kafuffle (talk) 10:44, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
reasoning -98.219.137.213 (talk) 19:54, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Can a administrator restore Wes Lyons page I am looking to add content and realized this page was deleted. Thanks, — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.219.137.213 (talk) 19:56, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Some details and references have been made. -Kbsanjay (talk) 18:28, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
(revised)
I refer from mainspace to https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=Template_talk%3ANon-free_mugshot&action=historysubmit&diff=154472941&oldid=154292786 and I need to know what it said, INCLUDING THE CITATIONS.
Please restore it the template, and talk page, including their history, to mainspace or user space. ( I don't understand why the underlying template was deleted; Sfan00 IMG 's rationale [3] makes no sense to me; his thinking often doesn't make sense to me because the pattern I see often is that a template is removed from use inappropriately, and then deleted using that lack of use as justification; I'd be surprised if that isn't what happened hereThat's exactly what happened here! But, this whole parenthetical is tangential to the undeletion request...) And the refund template doesn't seem able to handle a request like this for old versions of a page. -Elvey (talk) 01:09, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Article was deleted because of the nature of the contributor, not the article, I wish to see and improve the article. -Kafuffle (talk) 16:04, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
This was a well written page that documented the history about this rare poster, the popular entertainers who were included on it, the photographer and illustrator who created the poster and how it helped to play a part in preserving Louisiana's music history' especially after Hurricanes like Katrina in 2005. The page included verifiable references including those from USA Today and the Times-Picayune, links to the artists who are still alive and those deceased. It became a page of history and in April of 2012 the poster was formally presented to the Louisiana Music Hall of Fame for their museum during Louisiana's 200th Birthday celebration in Baton Rouge. There is no self promotion because the poster is not being sold for profit and the agency it was created for no longer exists. I have a college degree and am knowledgeable about Louisiana music and history. If I have time, and you give me directions I can upload the articles if need be to help. I'm not sure why the Southern Stars poster page was deleted? Please forgive me if I've posted this in the wrong place and advise me as to the proper steps to take so it will be reinstated. Thank You. Respectfully, A Fan of LA music history -98.71.129.155 (talk) 04:10, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
reliable source :http://www.amazon.com/Quality-Management-Your-Key-Success/dp/0557627036 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jason0221 (talk • contribs) 09:30, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
The image that was uploaded into Commons has been deleted as ineligible or impermissible by author for Commons. Therefore, this non-free image must be undeleted for the article Tony Scott. -George Ho (talk) 19:02, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
Cause for deletion was erroneous. Bhattacharyya, contrary to common perception, is NOT a surname. It is actually a historical title that is now used as a surname. It is worthy of inclusion in a public encyclopedia, especially as many people do not know its historical origins. -115.184.236.14 (talk) 02:59, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
The old version was deleted, so may I get a copy of that. Thanks! -TBrandley 05:54, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
I don't know what the article was and the person who deleted it has retired, but I think that I could improve it and add references if it was undeleted. -Jc86035 (talk) 09:38, 23 September 2012 (UTC) PS I'd also like to know what the original content was. Jc86035 (talk) 09:40, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
It has been edited and believe it should all be copyrighted correctly now -Rcottle (talk) 10:43, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
Sir, the Article is a free work and has a lot of reason for not being deleted. Samara James is an diamond selling organization in UK. The reason why article shall not be deleted are given below: 01. Samara James created a revolution in the world of diamond by letting people every information of diamonds. Their Videos are very instructive and helpful. Samara James first introduced the Diamond Scanned that can automatically scan diamond and its fields which is rare in UK and the world. Samara James introduce a new version of the diamond ring model of Princess Diana in the wedding of Kate Middleton and Prince William in 2011. Samara James are the third highest selling Diamond organization in UK. They have online service of high level and they work in there. The did a lot of campaign on the importance of consumers understanding the country of origin of diamonds purchase and and the weaknesses in control of the Kimberly Process. Samara James has been quoted in the UK Press about the changing demands of customers in an internet age, no other organization has been quoted for this. They are specialists of Engagement Rings. They are accurate with their carat rate. The organization has some good References to be on Wikipedia. They have become the Headline of BBC.co.uk and showed their work on the program. They along with Russel Lord work for making jewellery for the member of the Royal Family. So, it's my earnest request to not delete the Article and I wish you will be kind enough to do so. -Sourov0000 (talk) 11:16, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi, on the English Wikipedia the source of "File:Bolliger & Mabillard logo.svg" is to an image that has been deleted. Is there any way to get that image back to figure out the real source? The reason why the image was deleted was because it was not used on any articles...meanwhile it still is, on Bolliger & Mabillard. -Dom497 (talk) 23:49, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
the page is not an advertisement. The page clearly displays the history of the Catholic Company and its accomplishments. A page for a celebrity or another popular company would read similarly -Nrabiipour09 (talk) 15:48, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
The deleted article was relevant, the one it now redirects to is mostly not. The deleted article was a bit messy but still good, the current one is messy and gravely lacks information. The deletion was based on the claim "about a fanmade term that has had no serious or critical coverage by any sort of media" which is very strange because the term is commonly used even if noone writes philosophical essays about it. It is simply a term that isn´t used by everyone all the time. The term "magic satchel" that it directs to now is ironically much LESS used still, and as someone on a talkpage said, Hammerspace is what you have IN a magic satchel. Not to mention that Hammerspace is very commonly used for comedy effects, rather than a magic satchels convenience. Currently, if i want information on Hammerspace, the page specifically on this term on TVtropes is the place to go, because the joke of a wikipage that i get directed to is practically useless for this term (and some others that seems to have been crammed together in one very poorly thought up mess, under a heading that is less used than most of the terms it tries to cover). Epic fail. Also, the delete discussion showed a horrible lack of objectivity or knowledge, user Ryulong dismisses both "keep" votes in a very questionable way. And finally, now there ARE additional obvious sources for the original article to refer to, like the TVtropes one. This is without doubt the most stupid/questionable/unwarranted merger/deletion i´ve seen on wiki so far. Really needs fixing. -DW75 (talk) 20:43, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
Please email all versions. Writing article on similar topic. - - 08:44, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
reasoning -58.146.126.166 (talk) 11:59, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
reasoning Article was deleted because "concern was: Non-notable street". Street is extremely important culturally and historically in Kansas City. It is a major racial and ethnic dividing line in the city. -Chaglang (talk) 16:12, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
I don't need it undeleted permanently, but I can't see how it could contain a copyvio from the mentioned website and I suspect that there were many different versions containing plain, non problematic data that would be greatly useful for me to recreate it anew. You can also just send me the texts via email, I would deeply appreciate any prompt replies. Thanks, -Elitre (talk) 09:22, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
That page was totally about an educational society. Similar pages also exists on Wikipedia. Deletion of the page FUUAST Talent was very unfair. I am very disappointed with wikipedia's policies. -Fahad Malik 20:45, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
"Sparrow SMS is a product by Janaki Technology Pvt. Ltd, a Nepal based IT company. The company has been regarded as one of the top 10 IT companies in Nepal for 2012 in a public survey. Sparrow SMS is the third most popular brand in Nepal in Facebook as per the Socialbakers report. Survey - http://everestlist.org/everest-100-top-it-companies-in-nepal-2012/ Sparrow SMS facebook page - http://facebook.com/sparrowsms and the Socialbakers report is http://www.socialbakers.com/facebook-statistics/nepal . The official blog for Sparrow SMS is http://blog.sparrowsms.com/" -acpmasquerade 13:17, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
Request opportunity to rewrite article. Iman Foroutan is a major figure in Human Rights movements involving Iran. This page was not given a seven day period for discussion or revisions before it was deleted for supposed advertising. Please allow me to rewrite the article from a new perspective. Thank you. -Charity Cupp (talk) 13:32, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
reasoning -Whoop90 (talk) 19:37, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
I am requesting undeletion of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stellar_Global_LLC.
If the article is too promotional or insignificant, please provide me guidance on how to improve the article. Whoop90 (talk) 19:37, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
My sandbok User:Argosy/sandbox and I creator portal version french ; fr:Portail:Camion another count FrankyLeRoutier, complete construction portal, my version to sandbok is o.k. ? english is not principal language for me. Thank you -Argosy (talk) 10:21, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
another page ; Portal:Trucks/Categories, Portal:Trucks/Intro, Portal:Trucks/Projects, Portal:Trucks/Related portals, Portal:Trucks/Selected article/1, Portal:Trucks/Selected article/2, Portal:Trucks/Selected article/3, Portal:Trucks/Selected article/4, Portal:Trucks/Selected article/5, Portal:Trucks/Selected manufacturer/1, Portal:Trucks/Selected manufacturer/2, Portal:Trucks/Selected manufacturer/3, Portal:Trucks/Selected manufacturer/4, Portal:Trucks/Selected manufacturer/5, Portal:Trucks/Wikimedia, Portal:Trucks/box-footer, Portal:Trucks/box-header