Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in deletion debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied, restored as a draft or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page. Please do not request that articles deleted under speedy deletion criteria A7 or G11 be undeleted here.

Note that requests for undeletion are not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Instructions for special cases

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Knee bumps

I, Myturbogsx95, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Myturbogsx95 (talk) 04:54, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:01, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Domino Presley

I, Hada poka, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Hada poka (talk) 08:42, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:08, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft: Barbara Schmidt

I, Atlantic306, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Atlantic306 (talk) 14:53, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:41, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Multi F5 lost logs affected by block+revert

Files lost under WP:F5 as all were replaced with invalid versions by blocked user Aolden23. Yamla blocked and reverted edits. Some of the original files still need recovery:

Cheers —KylieTastic (talk) 15:12, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done apart from Hhgregg Logo A E.png which is already on commons. A few others could also be transferred to commons too. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:54, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Baltic International Bank

Please restore to my user-space. I'd like to see if I could get it in shape (having not seen the previous article). Thanks . —Toddst1 (talk) 16:02, 29 July 2017 (UTC) Toddst1 (talk) 16:02, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Request withdrawn Thanks Hut. Toddst1 (talk) 22:52, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:World Urban Parks

I, Whytednb, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Whytednb (talk) 21:01, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:42, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MISSPELLING

Redirect —37.126.98.251 (talk) 04:56, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ahaan Panday

I, 2deniz3, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2deniz3 (talk) 08:20, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

CrryMinati

"Save page" button below —Dheeraj1235 (talk) 13:30, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Inna Rosputnia

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Vanushyn (talk) 14:18, 30 July 2017 (UTC) Hi! The page I approved https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inna_Rosputnia_(Lady_F) was deleted by Athaenara The reason was stated is promotion. I didn't place any promotion into this article. But if there is some information you think have to be edited, please let me know - I will edit it. I don't understand this delition. All the stated information is real facts and can be confirmed. This person have a lot of referances and interview. I think successful female traders have to be featured on Wikipedia, specially if they are also pholanthropists and work hard to make positive changes in society. Inna Rosputnia is a memeber of Cherie Blair Foundation. she is making significant contributions to women empowerment and granting african students. Such women who was born in a poor contries, became successfull and help others have to featured in Wikipedia. They make contributions to make world better. Please, recover the page and notify if any editing in your opinion is necessary. Thank you![reply]

Khethukuthula Mhlongo

The administrator who deleted this recognised an uncanny similarity in my name and the name of the person who is the subject of the article. I came to the conclusion that the administrator thought I was writing about myself which obviously is impermissible by Wikipedia and all its terms. —Mhlongokhetho (talk) 14:32, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Argentina at major beauty pageants

So many articles have been created about countries on major beauty pageants and I have a good source where to look for then you deleted the article? How come? Is this removing pride from Argentina's achievements in the beauty pageant scene? —T4mb4y 22 (talk) 22:02, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@T4mb4y: Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
@Winged Blades of Godric: since you originally prodded this, you may want to consider AFD. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:21, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Naina (song) Comment

The page was soft deleted in the absence of any discussion and deleting administrator mentioned that WP:Refund applies. A notable song article which had coverages, but as it was a Hindi film song, had a discussion about its film. But this factor doesn't affects it's notability. Article can be further improved.Further deletion was not a required as it could have been redirected to Dangal (film) article. —Anoptimistix Let's Talk 04:41, 31 July 2017 (UTC) Anoptimistix Let's Talk 04:41, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Anoptimistix: I have restored the page.
@Winged Blades of Godric: You may want to redirect as suggested above, or try again at AfD if you feel this cannot be improved. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:25, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GoldCore

Company is covered all over the world and quoted as expert regarding the Precious Metal industry. A search of Google News shows 14,000 quotations and references from countries in Africa, Europe, Asia and the US. —144.2.242.85 (talk) 06:51, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Search results mean nothing in terms of notability, especially if all they're returning is "quotations" as quotables are useless as sources. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 07:45, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Radiona

I, Izumitelj, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Izumitelj (talk) 07:14, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:15, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:WEEE Forum

I, 2A02:2788:406:4E2:F009:343D:4096:AC29, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 2A02:2788:406:4E2:F009:343D:4096:AC29 (talk) 07:53, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:17, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Woody Show

The Woody Show is a syndicated morning radio show that's distributed by iHeartRadio. Deletion of the page and forwarded to KYSR is confusing because the show is on more than one radio station. Please republish The Woody Show page for the listeners of the show. Thank You —70.239.149.145 (talk) 10:39, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What exactly is the problem? The article is not deleted, nor is it currently being proposed for deletion. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:38, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Check the history ‑ Iridescent 22:02, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Julio Llort Guindulain

I would like the page to be undeleted because i havent have time to translate it to english. And as I understand they deleted it because it was only in spanish, and I dont understand what is the problem whith that. I also already added reliable citations and artricles that support my page. So in that part I do not understand why they took it down. So please I put so much work in it just to see it being deleted, so just put it back up so i can fix it the way you want it to be. Best regards, IsauraLlort —IsauraLlort (talk) 19:20, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@IsauraLlort: I have restored this to draft space at Draft:Julio Llort Guindulain. It is not to be published in main article space until it is reviewed in the Wikipedia:Articles for creation process. This is the English Wikipedia, and we publish articles in English only. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:35, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Os Cascavelletes

This page is blocked from being created since 2010, and I wanted to try and create a decent article because I created fairly decent articles about Brazilian bands and musicians —Anonymous from the 21st century (talk) 20:00, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Have you tried going through the drafting process? —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:03, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done. Start over. In draft space. The deleted article in its entirety was a single sentence: "Os Cascavelletes were a Brazilian rock band". If it were restored, it would be speedily deleted again. ~Anachronist (talk) 21:30, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[1]37.124.55.204 (talk) 23:12, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It used to be a redirect to Miscellaneous_Mathematical_Symbols-B and also at another time to Backslash and never had readable content. So it's not worth restoring. Do you want to write an article? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:48, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Smeezy

I, Tobexi, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Tobexi (talk) 01:06, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Heinrich Tessenow.jpg

File was previously uploaded here; it was deleted form commons because of unclear status (no author information). Even if it is really copyrighted, it can be stored here under Fair Use and used in Heinrich Tessenow. —Ankry (talk) 06:26, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done Please add fair use rationale and any reason you think it would be public domain. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:09, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Chudleigh's Limited

I, Peter Toi, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Peter Toi (talk) 11:28, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Coiled Coil Domain Containing 142

I, Chitt017, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Chitt017 (talk) 13:07, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Have not had time to review my article due to being out of the country. Will edit it as soon as it's available to me again.

  • Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the colored button in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft for review!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:45, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Khethukuthula Mhlongo

I have contacted the administrator who deleted this page and has not replied to me ever since. This page was deleted on the grounds G11, A7 which the pagr is not a promotion nor is it an advertising of sort. It is not even written from a nuetral point of view. So please! —Mhlongokhetho (talk) 13:40, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Khethuo Davidson

I have contacted the administrator who deleted this page and has not replied to me ever since. This page was deleted on the grounds G11, A7 which the pagr is not a promotion nor is it an advertising of sort. It is not even written from a nuetral point of view. So please! If you feel that it lacks citations and references. Please allow me some time to search for credible sources —Mhlongokhetho (talk) 13:47, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done I see no claim of importance, for example that the blogger had multiple stories written about them in newspapers. You can start again in Draft:Khetho Davidson. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:13, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Astrar22/sandbox

Did not violate web hosting guideline and then click the "Save page" button below — Preceding unsigned comment added by Astrar22 (talkcontribs) at 19:22, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Africa at Miss International

I have good resources for the article and there are websites I got all the information. Please restore my article; I am looking forward to your response. —T4mb4y 22 (talk) 21:14, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:HostCMS

I, ITbugoff, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. ITbugoff (talk) 04:17, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Further editing is planned —ITbugoff (talk) 04:18, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unlawful Deletion of a Page

Hi, The page https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Programs_renamed_by_Modi_Government has been deleted without any notice and has been redirected to https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_government_schemes_in_India . Is there any possible way to get back that content? There are loads of information that have been deleted without notice. Kindly help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Balogic (talkcontribs) 12:30, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Balogic:  Not done. "Unlawful"? "Without notice"? No, it was quite lawful, and there was plenty of notice and much discussion. There was a community discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Programs renamed by Modi Government in which the outcome was to redirect the page to List of government schemes in India. If you feel that the way it was closed was improper, you may ask for a review at Wikipedia:Deletion review. In any case, the content was not deleted, it's still all there in the history of the redirect page. Consider improving the List of government schemes in India instead; do not un-do the AFD decision without consulting the closing administrator. ~Anachronist (talk) 15:49, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

UrbanSocial

The page was deleted because it was promotional in nature which we think might be borderline. I will remove the content that might be promotional and keep it solely fact based including links from other awards pages. There are multiple external news reference links (BBC, telegraph, Sun) and Grapevinesocial as an events company that founded Wine Tasting Dating has more impressive references. The pages for UK dating awards and other pages which linked to this page now have no link on them. Many of the other companies in this sector have pages including Lovestruck.com as an example. We will mimic the level of non-promotional content on that —JimGeo (talk) 12:46, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@JimGeo: Done – as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored upon request.
@Power~enwiki: since you prodded this, you may want to consider AFD if you believe the article cannot be improved to address your concerns. ~Anachronist (talk) 15:53, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I agree it's borderline. I won't AfD it now, but might in a few weeks if it isn't improved. Power~enwiki (talk) 16:22, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:List of Camden Crawl performers

I, GrammarFascist, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. GrammarFascist contribstalk 14:02, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nathan Brackett

I can't see what was there, but it looks like there was some decent coverage of Brackett in 2016, after the article was deleted. Please restore the article to my userspace so I can try to get it in shape to pass WP:BIO. Thanks. —Toddst1 (talk) 14:24, 2 August 2017 (UTC) Toddst1 (talk) 14:24, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple images for Aqeel Solangi

Three images were lost to WP:F5 due to a mistake on copy vio now reverted. So can these be refunded now the original article restored:

Cheers —KylieTastic (talk) 17:19, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Defendable

. —78.95.69.28 (talk) 18:48, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Center on Reinventing Public Education

I, 208.186.22.172, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 208.186.22.172 (talk) 18:57, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Angola at major beauty pageants

This is for restoring the information on countries on major beauty pageants. I have reliable sources for providing the details of the article. We are looking forward to your response. —T4mb4y 22 (talk) 23:19, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@T4mb4y: First, who is this "we" you refer to? If you are associated with the pageant in any way, see WP:PAID and comply with it, as you agreed to abide by the Terms of Use when you created your account.
Not done – this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angola at major beauty pageants, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Postdlf (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. ~Anachronist (talk) 23:27, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cheezburger Cat may has - drawing.jpg

Image is my own work and I agree to its use by anyone, etc., under Wikipedia's copyleft requirements —GrammarFascist contribstalk 01:16, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Saurabh Kumar Shah (IPS)

Please donot delete this page. he is IPS of Siwan Bihar. http://siwan.bih.nic.in/GAD.asp please belive me view this official website —— Preceding unsigned comment added by Giteshs78 (talkcontribs) date (UTC) 02:24, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. Notability, not existence, is our inclusion criteria. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 05:04, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alan Laney

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Apicker (talk) 04:03, 3 August 2017 (UTC) Alan Laney This page should be Undeleted as it may have unjustly been deleted due to prejudice and or personal vendetta.[reply]

@Apicker:  Not done. Take it up with the deleting admin Jo-Jo Eumerus and if you are not satisfied, you can have the AFD decision reviewed at Wikipedia:Deletion review to determine if the AFD close was proper. However, I'll point out that Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Laney (2nd nomination) was unanimous in its consensus to delete, so seemed that closing as 'delete' was the proper action, and as such, it cannot be restored by request on this page.
Also, if you are Alan Laney, or associated with him, you have a conflict of interest that must be disclosed publicly. From your contributions, you are what we call a Wikipedia:Single purpose account because 100% of your contributions have been related to Alan Laney. If you have a conflict of interest, the only viable venue available for you to publish and article is Wikipedia:Articles for creation where you would have your article reviewed by an uninvolved third party prior to acceptance into main article space. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:21, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I will add that Alan Laney would have to meet at least one of the criteria in WP:MUSICBIO before he would merit an article on Wikipedia. Wikipedia:Golden rule gives a good overview of what is expected in an article. ~Anachronist (talk) 04:24, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Laney (2nd nomination) offers a number of legit arguments that the topic is not suitable for inclusion; there is no evidence that it may have unjustly been deleted due to prejudice and or personal vendetta. I'll pre-emptively say "no" to any undeletion request unless the notability concerns are addressed. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:22, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Melissa McLawhorn Houston

I, Danielle at Ok Labor, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Danielle at Ok Labor (talk) 15:15, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:43, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hot Octopuss

I was called out by Onel5969 for the page being too promotional. To that end, I made edits that removed the controversial tone and statements. I included what I was doing in my Talk Page as well as his. Then Randykitty said my photo (which was a free-use logo) was no good and deleted the whole page. I didn't even get a chance to have a discussion with either of them. It is better to make further edits than to delete the whole page, don't you think? — Preceding unsigned comment added by EllenZoe (talkcontribs) 17:02, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Already done by Randykitty at User:EllenZoe/Hot Octopuss. — JJMC89(T·C) 21:40, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Suiteness

I, Dmulan123, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Dmulan123 (talk) 19:09, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done – as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored upon request. Please edit the page to address any issues raised, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.

REDIRECT

Redirect to Redirect78.95.69.28 (talk) 22:03, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why not.  Done. And protected against future unintentional vandalism. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:29, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cognateness

wikt:cognateness78.95.69.28 (talk) 22:14, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK, done, it's a Wiktionary redirect. Create an account and you could have done it yourself. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:34, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Amīrah

78.95.69.28 (talk) 22:19, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done, because it is not clear what is being requested. Restoring it would create a double redirect. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:36, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My_Little_Pony:_Friendship_Is_Magic_(mobile_game)

Redirect to My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic (video game)78.95.69.28 (talk) 22:38, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done. Implausible redirect, unlikely anyone would type all that; the article is discoverable without the disambiguator. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:37, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Doomsday (Sonic the Hedgehog)

[3]78.95.69.28 (talk) 22:46, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done, there is no actionable request here. The target is not an article, it's a redirect. Feel free to create a new article. ~Anachronist (talk) 03:38, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Something strikes me as odd about all the requests by this IP today (yesterday UTC). —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 06:27, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew Hales

There was no objection at that time but I requested for speedy deletion, the article was stable enough. —Mjbmr (talk) 09:04, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:-Users-admin-Downloads-Murnane3-page-001.jpg

I need the old revision so that I can crop the whitespace and upload a usable version. ——Guanaco 10:04, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DoThink Group

The company is a major player in international real estate with a growing presence in the US —Wikipietime (talk) 15:25, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Baltic International Bank (2)

Significant bank with appropriate sources —Wikipietime (talk) 15:30, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted as-is here; try contacting the deleting administrator (Jimfbleak (talk · contribs)). Alternatively, you may request the page be restored as a draft or to have the contents of its last known revision emailed to you provided you have email enabled in your account's preferences. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:13, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Not done But you may recreate the page. Do not copy text from the bank web site. That is what is giving the promotional tone. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:36, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Language of Business (TV program)

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below —Bbear2001 (talk) 15:40, 4 August 2017 (UTC) no one ever contacted editors to discuss. can a copy of page be restored so its content can be discussed in pieces?[reply]

Whitney Reynolds

Chicago TV host's page was suddenly deleted for no apparent reason. —Llavsa (talk) 16:38, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done The reason for deletion was that the writer wanted to get rid of the page. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:33, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Morty C-137/SPI-Case

I was not notified or given any option to contest this deletion, and the deletion was done by someone who has been involved in protecting the harasser who tried to drive me off wikipedia. —Morty C-137 (talk) 22:11, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Already done by Anachronist. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:34, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) @Morty C-137: It was apparently deleted as miscellany that hadn't been edited in over 3 months. The deleting admin wrote in the log that it could be restored by request. I have restored it. I recall there's a page in Wikipedia space (other than SPI) for keeping records of problematic sock farm users, but I can't remember what it's called. If you find it, you might consider moving your page there. ~Anachronist (talk) 22:40, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tekfusion

I was working on updating credible links to this article, it seemed to be created in good faith and did not appear promotional in any sense, and the company is a noteworthy audio brand in India from 2011. If any concerns arise, I would suggest to raise them in the article's talk page, rather than just deleting the whole page. "Save page" button below —RaviKumar86 (talk) 12:25, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]