RadyoUkay819

RadyoUkay819 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

20 June 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


According to the general stats of RadyoUkay819 and the general stats of LamChiong20 says that both accounts were created at the same day and same hour and just a few minutes after the other one was created. Both accounts did unsourced edits and I gave LamChiong20 two warnings (General note and caution) while I gave RadyoUkay819 one caution which is the second level warning since the user was doing a lot of unsourced edits so I want an investigation. For Dxoc1494 and Wildfm985, I suspected that it is also a sock puppet of RadyoUkay819 since the four user pages have the same format as well. Triila73 (talk) 07:36, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

 Confirmed, blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:04, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

02 July 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


As I said on the previous report, According to the general stats of RadyoUkay819 and the general stats of LamChiong20 says that both accounts were created at the same day and same hour and just a few minutes after the other one was created. Both accounts did unsourced edits and I gave LamChiong20 two warnings (General note and caution) while I gave RadyoUkay819 one caution which is the second level warning since the user was doing a lot of unsourced edits so I want an investigation. For Dxoc1494 and Wildfm985, I suspected that it is also a sock puppet of RadyoUkay819 since the four user pages have the same format as well.

NOTE: RadyoUkay819, Wildfm985, Lamchiong20 and Dxoc1494 has been blocked BUT THERE ARE TWO MORE ACCOUNTS THAT IT MIGHT BE A SOCK OF RADYOUKAY819 AS WELL THAT IS YET TO BE BLOCKED

So the four accounts are blocked UNTIL I saw two more socks, Healing2019 and CottonSwabs100. It's also the same thing that the first four blocked accounts, always on a minor edit mode. Same user page format and more.

The two accounts have to be blocked before the unsourced edits from the person. Triila73 (talk) 10:03, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

 Confirmed, blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:55, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

26 July 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Same evidence as the recent investigations. Please do NOT delete the articles that the sock puppets have created. I'll handle it. Triila73 (talk) 05:13, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

 Confirmed, blocked, tagged, closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:14, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

09 August 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Same evidence with the first batch of investigations. All three accounts have the same user page format and all use minor edit mode. Triila73 (talk) 01:04, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]
That seems like enough to block on behavior among themselves. But I'm holding off for a moment because I agree there is also some evidence of other accounts' involvement (Jillian2006 and Mache2007 intersect at Miss Universe 2019 with the same name-pattern, and also Mikko101 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) also intersects with several. The more eyes look here, the more accounts we seem to find. CU would help nail this all down. DMacks (talk) 16:04, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No worries. I came her from a COIN request, where evidence was requested, so all I did was look for evidence. This genre's sock-drawers are not in my bureau. DMacks (talk) 17:45, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

21 September 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


With the recent investigations, almost had the same evidence. The username ends with "2019" and the userpage has the same format with the other accounts before the other accounts have been blocked. Also has the same editing methods compared to the recent investigations. Triila73 (talk) 00:33, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

22 September 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Same userpage format as other accounts, same editing methods as well. Triila73 (talk) 05:29, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

27 September 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Same editing methods, same user page format, same username style (because the username ends with a number like other socks of RadyoUkay819) Triila73 (talk) 09:33, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

29 September 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Same editing methods, same user page format, same contributions. Also same username pattern (ends with a number on the username like other sock accounts)
Is it possible that there are other accounts that I didn't spotted that are also related to RadyoUkay819? Please check.

Triila73 (talk) 15:39, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

30 September 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Opening for possible WP:DUCK concerning SPAs on a handful of 2018–2019 beauty pageant competitions. This will either be completed with evidence, or withdrawn within 24 hours. Bri.public (talk) 20:31, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry do not have time to complete analysis. Consider the 30 September inquiry withdrawn. Bri.public (talk) 16:06, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]


02 October 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Same userpage format, same editing methods, same username pattern (ends with a number), also related to beauty pageants. IS IT POSSIBLE THAT THERE ARE OTHER SOCK ACCOUNTS THAT I DIDN'T SPOTTED? Triila73 (talk) 11:20, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

The account has made only 4 mainspace edits, but Special:Permalink/900221217 and Special:Permalink/919158549 do look awfully similar. And the use of a properly formatted template and <blockquote> as one's very first two edits [1][2], followed by template editing as their third [3], is unusual for a new user to say the least. - Bri.public (talk) 17:03, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

08 October 2019

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Same editing methods, same user page format, same username pattern (ends with number). Triila73 (talk) 10:28, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

01 September 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Duck-like adding selves to same project as first edit after registration[4][5], similar userpages created as second edit [6][7], editing same articles generally. In this case, one starts editing less than an hour after the other creates.

Per WP:BEANS not saying why but the SPI staff will recognize Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RadyoUkay819.

There may be others currently active, specifically one who appears to have lifted the contents of user sandbox, then the other finds and edits soon after [8]. Requesting CU for a sweep.

Odd IP edits look like logged-out editing but geolocation is inconsistent. Proxies? ☆ Bri (talk) 05:22, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Finland 2020 11:28, 30 August 2020‎ Dxma929 creates
Miss Finland 11:34, 30 August 2020‎ Dermawand2020 [12] adds first inlink
Miss Finland 2020 11:35, 30 August 2020‎ Dermawand2020 edits
Miss Finland 2020 11:42, 30 August 2020‎ Leila1990 [13] begins editing
In other words, editing a new article less than 20 minutes after its creation by a sockfarm, and only 8 minutes after its first inlink is added by the same sockfarm – fishy. ☆ Bri (talk) 01:32, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@RoySmith: Leila1990 is not blocked or tagged. Did you forget to block/tag? - Bri.public (talk) 22:29, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bri.public, They look blocked to me. Are you not seeing the same? -- RoySmith (talk) 22:38, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You are right; sorry, I must have been looking at another account and/or don't have the blocked users strikethrough setting on my alt account - Bri.public (talk) 22:51, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Bri.public, I think there's been some systemic issues today which has been causing scripts like the block-strikeout gadget to intermittently fail. No worries, and thanks for the heads up. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:09, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

23 September 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


A few days after the latest known sock in this sockfarm is blocked (9/14 [19]), this account is created (9/19 [20]), and almost immediately starts editing the same article that the sockfarm is the #3 top editor on [21]. Additional similarities in username construction are apparent. A quick CU look-see is requested in light of prolific socking in this entire space (see Conflict of interest noticeboard). Bri.public (talk) 15:41, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

24 September 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Reading the editor interaction carefully shows that these two accounts have been tag-teaming Miss Universe articles in a way that implies either meat- or sockpuppetry. Asking for CU since this area is wholly rife with sockfarms; see conflict of interest noticeboard for a run-down.

The tag-teaming is most plain in their articles that appear first in the editor interaction tool (sorted by min time between edits) as follows. The bulleted item is when they switched off, i.e. the first edit of a new account on a particular article. Full diffs are only listed for Miss Universe 2012 due to tedium; they can be followed in their entirety through the tool if necessary [22].

Miss_Universe_2012
Miss_Universe_2013
Miss_Universe_2016
Miss_Universe_2018
Miss_Universe_2019

In fact not only are they grooming the same sections of the same articles in the same manner, but they are following a virtual A/B schedule in doing so. Here's each account's activity on the articles listed above, by day.

Requesting checkuser cross-check against recently active beauty pageant sockfarms including DevilBlack69 and RadyoUkay819. Note that there's a CU confirmed KellyXxxx account in the sockfarm. ☆ Bri (talk) 02:54, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

One other thing I missed before; KellyKelly2013 was blocked for changing "United States" to USA in beauty queen articles; this is also a favored edit of Felipevmvillalobos [27][28][29]. ☆ Bri (talk) 03:25, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A note on user timecards. It looks like K and F may be on different continents. This is consistent with my statement at COIN concerning international coordination. I'll retain the CU request, though, in case of matches with the DevilBlack69]] and RadyoUkay819 sockfarms. ☆ Bri (talk) 04:15, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ST47 I'm not sure if I'm allowed to do this; may I ask that the master's userpage be annotated as banned per WP:THREESTRIKES? ☆ Bri (talk) 01:00, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

26 September 2020

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


New account on their first edit [30] restores the identical changes to the same article last edited a few days ago [31] by a blocked account in the RU sockfarm, then their subsequent editing is another one where multiple RU socks have been blocked [32]. Naming convention, edit summary (not) habits, account name are all consistent with this sockfarm. And a striking preference for a particular fansite that this sockfarm has repeatedly introduced into beauty pageant articles [33].

Also note User:LexiLights in the DevilBlack69 sockfarm, which I believe is actually the same sockfarm as this one (I have requested a merge). ☆ Bri (talk) 14:19, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]
Please do not merge the cases. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 20:03, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

09 January 2021

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Simplewiki checkuser confirmed the link. Account exists here also and the user is a banned sockpuppet. --IWI (talk) 00:10, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

I'll follow up with Oshwah privately. Operator873talkconnect 04:34, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

26 March 2023

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Unusual appearance together at drafts and out of the way articles, including notably the master account moving a draft to main space a few minutes after the suspected sock made their last edit here and here. ☆ Bri (talk) 22:33, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

New evidence: both are beauty pageant SPAs and one blanked the sockpuppet tag on the RadyoUkay819 sockmaster page (a pageant LTA). If I had seen that before, I would have opened this SPI as a continuation of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/RadyoUkay819. ☆ Bri (talk) 22:38, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

28 March 2023

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

User page was created by another user account, which is a confirmed sockpuppet, and exactly matches the sock's user page. Wondering if this was missed by checkuser? ☆ Bri (talk) 16:26, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm adding another user whose draft was moved to article space by a sockpuppet suspiciously soon after their last edit [34]. ☆ Bri (talk) 17:55, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]
More