XPanettaa

XPanettaa (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

20 October 2016

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

As of Oct. 19th, 2016, the IP editor (86.84.247.233) had made 861 edits. Of those, 259 were to the same 98 articles edited by XPanettaa.

I left a message for XPanettaa here to inquire if they were inadvertently editing while logged out, but XPanettaa replied here saying "I don't think that I'm logged out, I'm logged in. However, I think that someone is using my PD address despite I'm making edits while logged in, but it wasn't me."

My understanding is that "editors may not use more than one account to contribute to the same page or discussion in a way that suggests they are multiple people".

As well, XPanettaa states on their talk page that "this user has Dutch as their native language", while the IP editor is registered to the Netherlands. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:06, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments from Graeme Bartlett

Is there any problematic editing going on? Behaviorally it looks to be the same editor, but it seems just to be an error and a failure of XPanettaa to notice not being logged in. At https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&oldid=704137896#Logos of the digital channels of the NPO you can see them being the same person. But there is no intended deception going on. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:30, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Even after a warning was left on XPanettaa's talk page, they used the IP to revert this edit. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:19, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Magnolia677: I've laid discussed and my friend, who used my IP address while I'm logged in, has gotten a lot of past. I just saw my friend using my IP address illegitimately, despite I'm making edits while logged in. I asked him to stop using my IP address and he did. But he doesn't seem like the issues have stopped there. He have repeatedly used my IP address illegitimately, after I made an edit while logged in. I think that he made a mistake. XPanettaa (talk) 13:54, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

31 October 2016

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Returned today after a week block and instantly began removing AfD notices and editing on the usual Dutch EDM articles as is clear from today's editing history. See previous report and block here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/XPanettaa/Archive Karst (talk) 17:40, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

 Looks like a duck to me - clearly the same user. Let's try blocking for a month. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:50, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


1 November 2016

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Repeatedly recreating this page with similarly poor sources and similar information etc (not sure if exactly the same as the original as it was recently deleted). Has also edited Curbi and Spinnin' Records, both of which have had a fair bit of attention from XPanettaa. Nikthestunned 17:39, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

20 December 2016

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


After a month ban for block evasion the anon IP began editing again on the 9 December, the first edit removing the warnings from the Talk page here, clearly indicating violation. Karst (talk) 15:00, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Hi. I can assure you I am not a sock puppet or guilty of sock puppetry, the account named XPanettaa that I've (for to me unknown reasons) been linked to is in no way associated with me, and I did not use the operating device of the guy who is the owner of the account XPanettaa (which I didn't use and therefore only used by him), which he is logged into Wikipedia, as well into other projects, I used another operating device, which he didn't use and which he is not (yet) logged into Wikipedia, as well into other projects. Also this IP address I am using, has been subsequently passed over to me and as he wasn't using the IP address, I used it for a while. I do expect this IP address to be spared for I am not guilty. If any proof is necessary please let me know what you need so I can provide. --86.84.247.233 (talk) 15:36, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

Blocked IP for three months. Closing.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:42, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


22 December 2016

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]


Block evasion, perhaps using a related school IP. Usual electronic music edits and became active after the last IP was blocked for a similar offence. Karst (talk) 10:43, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Hello, I can assure you I'm not a sock puppet or guilty of sock puppetry, the account XPanettaa and the IP 86.84.247.233 that I've (for to me unknown reasons) been linked to are in no way associated with me, and I am therefore unrelated to them. I have also never used them before. I am however the user of another anonymous IP but don't have an account etc. I do expect this IP to be spared for I am not guilty. If any proof is necessary please let me know what you need so I can provide. --141.138.146.132 (talk) 13:17, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:XPanettaa has also edited the obscure Sky Radio article, and has posted on his talk page that he is from The Netherlands. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:47, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

17 April 2017

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Block evasion Karst (talk) 06:21, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]

28 September 2017

[edit]

Suspected sockpuppets

[edit]

Block evasion, previously duck-blocked by Mkdw (see 22 December 2016 case). The IP became active again and started editing electronic music-related articles. — Zawl 11:14, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

[edit]

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

[edit]