Submission rejected on 26 March 2024 by Qcne (talk). This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Rejected by Qcne 35 days ago. Last edited by Citation bot 35 days ago. Ask for advice

Submission declined on 2 February 2024 by Sirdog (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements) reliable secondary strictly independent of the subject Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Sirdog 2 months ago.

Submission declined on 31 January 2024 by Noahfgodard (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements) reliable secondary strictly independent of the subject Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Noahfgodard 3 months ago.

Submission declined on 30 January 2024 by Theroadislong (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements) reliable secondary strictly independent of the subject Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Theroadislong 3 months ago.

• Comment: I'm sorry, there is no indication of notability here yet. The sources are nearly all press-releases regarding funding rounds (see WP:ROUTINE). Try again in a year or two. Qcne (talk) 19:46, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

• Comment: Phraseology in this draft is still quite promotional in nature. Out of the 6 available sources, 5 appear to be reporting on the $2.9 M funding, which I'd say is routine for an organization such as this. The remaining source is from TechCrunch which the community has identified issues with it's ability to establish notability. —Sirdog (talk) 05:07, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Deasie

Deasie

Company Logo
Company type	Private
Industry	Data Governance, Artificial Intelligence
Founded	2023; 1 year ago (2023)
Founders	Reece Griffiths, Mikko Peiponen, Leonard Platzer
Products	Data governance platform
Website	deasie.com

Deasie is a company in the United States focusing on data governance and applying artificial intelligence to manage data for business use. It aims to provide solutions for handling sensitive data, managing permissions, and tracking document versions in language model inputs.^[1]

Overview

Deasie develops a data governance platform designed to integrate with organizational data sources. This platform is intended to improve data quality and security for generative AI technologies, categorizing data by content and sensitivity to facilitate safer and more relevant application in AI-driven functions.^[2]

History

Established in 2023 by Reece Griffiths, Mikko Peiponen, and Leonard Platzer, Deasie was initiated to provide data governance solutions tailored for generative AI technologies. The founders combined their experiences in technology and business consultancy to create a platform addressing the complexities of data management in AI environments.^[3]

Product

The company's data governance platform offers automated compliance and data quality assessments. It features advanced tagging systems to classify data into categories like 'personally identifiable information' or 'proprietary', aiding in the efficient and secure utilization of data in AI systems.^[4]

Funding

Deasie secured $2.9 million in seed funding in October 2023. The investment round included contributions from entities like Y Combinator and General Catalyst, aiming to facilitate the expansion of the team and further product development.^[5]

Market Impact

The company has been recognized in the enterprise market for its innovative approach to data governance, having initiated pilot programs with major organizations and establishing a substantial client pipeline, demonstrating a significant market interest in its platform.^[6]