Submission declined on 4 March 2024 by AngusWOOF (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by AngusWOOF 3 months ago. Last edited by Nerd271 39 hours ago. Reviewer: Inform author. Resubmit Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

Submission declined on 6 October 2023 by Johannes Maximilian (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Johannes Maximilian 8 months ago.

Submission declined on 8 December 2022 by Primefac (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Primefac 18 months ago.

Submission rejected on 16 November 2022 by AngusWOOF (talk). This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Rejected by AngusWOOF 19 months ago.

Submission declined on 16 June 2022 by AngusWOOF (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by AngusWOOF 2 years ago.

Submission declined on 28 May 2022 by Kaleeb18 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Kaleeb18 2 years ago.

Submission declined on 8 February 2022 by AngusWOOF (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by AngusWOOF 2 years ago.

Submission declined on 20 January 2022 by Dan arndt (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Dan arndt 2 years ago.

Submission declined on 17 November 2020 by IVORK (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by IVORK 3 years ago.

• Comment: No significant improvement since previous submit in October. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 18:29, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

• Comment: Mostly sourced to interviews and other PRIMARY references such as a show's website, with the remainder being brief mentions lacking significant coverage. Please add additional independent reliable sources that discuss the subject in detail. Primefac (talk) 14:52, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

• Comment: There are a few threads on the talk page that might be of interest. Primefac (talk) 15:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

• Comment: Once again, the decliner is very terse here. This submission is declined because Revord so far does not have a second significant role - when NACTOR talks about multiple films, tv shows, etc, that means more than one. The article needs to wait until Revord scores her second significant role, satisfying NACTOR. CapnZapp (talk) 16:31, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

• Comment: At this point, we need to wait for her second significant role, which none has been presented since the May 2022 decline. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 16:19, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

• Comment: Wish Upon isn't a starring role, no poster billing. Still WP:TOOSOON AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 16:12, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

• Comment: It really isn't apparent from the boilerplate text above but the decline boils down to WP:NACTOR, User:Madonepro. There's no point resubmitting until the article can show her having a second significant role - when NACTOR talks about multiple films, tv shows, etc, that means more than one. The draft easily meets every other criteria for publication. CapnZapp (talk) 10:41, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Raegan Revord (born January 3, 2008) is an American actress known for her role as Missy Cooper in the television series Young Sheldon.

Life

Raegan Revord was born on January 3, 2008, in San Diego, California. She was a junior ambassador for Children's Hospital Los Angeles.^[1][2] She is an only child.^[3] Her family moved to Los Angeles when she was three and a half years old.^[4] Revord and her mother were involved in a car accident in early 2023, and she said in March of that year that she has been suffering from panic attacks since the incident.^[2]

Career

Revord began modeling work for print advertisements and appeared in commercials at age four. She was cast as Megan in Modern Family at six. She had minor roles in Grace and Frankie, With Bob & David, and Teachers.^[1][5][6] She did voice work for the radio play Nilsa and the Troll.^[7]

In March 2017, Revord was cast as Missy Cooper, Sheldon Cooper's twin sister in the The Big Bang Theory spin-off Young Sheldon.^[8] The character had been used sparingly on The Big Bang Theory (2007-2019), which, according to Revord, gave her more room to make the character her own.^[9] One of the key characters of Young Sheldon,^[10] Missy Cooper has been described as adding a "much-needed spunk to the plot but also serves as the perfect foil to her academically-gifted twin brother, Sheldon."^[11] A Screen Rant article published 2024 opined, "For the longest time, Missy was Young Sheldon's best character, even though she was mostly sidelined."^[12] Revord picked up her Texan accent by watching Laurie Metcalf play an older version of her character's mother on The Big Bang Theory.^[13]

In 2022, Revord created Read with Raegan, an online book club with over 55,000 followers on Instagram. She wrote Rules for Fake Girlfriends, a young-adult novel that will be published by Wednesday Books in fall 2025.^[14]

Filmography

Television

Film