Mycoplasma genitalium (also known as MG[3],Mgen, or since 2018, Mycoplasmoides genitalium[1]) is a sexually transmitted,[4] small and pathogenicbacterium that lives on the mucousepithelial cells of the urinary and genital tracts in humans.[5] Medical reports published in 2007 and 2015 state that Mgen is becoming increasingly common.[6][7] Resistance to multiple antibiotics, including the macrolideazithromycin, which until recently was the most reliable treatment, is becoming prevalent.[6][8] The bacteria was first isolated from the urogenital tract of humans in 1981,[9] and was eventually identified as a new species of Mycoplasma in 1983.[2] It can cause negative health effects in men and women. It also increases the risk factor for HIV spread[10] with higher occurrences in those previously treated with the azithromycinantibiotics.[6][11]
Symptoms of infection
Mgen is a bacterium recognized for causing urethritis in both men and women along with cervicitis and pelvic inflammation in women.[12] It presents clinically similar symptoms to that of Chlamydia trachomatis infection and has shown higher incidence rates, compared to both Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections in some populations.[13]
There is a consistent association of M. genitalium infection and female reproductive tract syndromes. M. genitalium infection was significantly associated with increased risk of preterm birth, spontaneous abortion, cervicitis, and pelvic inflammatory disease. In addition, this pathogen may latently infect the chorionic villi tissues of pregnant women, thereby impacting pregnancy outcome.[17] Infertility risk is also strongly associated with infection with M. genitalium, although evidence suggests it is not associated with male infertility.[18] When M. genitalium is a co-infectious agent risk associations are stronger and statistically significant.[19]
Polymerase chain reaction analyses indicated that it is a cause of acute non-gonococcal urethritis (NGU) and probably chronic NGU. It is strongly associated with persistent and recurring non-gonococcal urethritis (NGU) responsible for 15 percent to 20 percent of symptomatic NGU cases in men.[20] Unlike other mycoplasmas, the infection is not associated with bacterial vaginosis.[21] It is highly associated with the intensity of HIV infection.[22] Some scientists are performing research to determine if Mgen could play a role in the development of prostate and ovarian cancers and lymphomas in some individuals. These studies have yet to find conclusive evidence to suggest a link.[23]
In 2006, the team at the J. Craig Venter Institute reported that only 382 genes are essential for biological functions.[29] The small genome of M. genitalium made it the organism of choice in The Minimal Genome Project, a study to find the smallest set of genetic material necessary to sustain life.[30]
There is limited divergence among clinical strains of M. genitalium. All strains retain the small genome size.[31]
Diagnosis
Recent research shows that prevalence of Mgen is currently higher than other commonly occurring sexually transmitted infections (STIs).[32] Mgen is a fastidious organism with prolonged growth durations. This makes detection of the pathogen in clinical specimens and subsequent isolation extremely difficult.[33] Lacking a cell wall, Mycoplasma remains unaffected by commonly used antibiotics.[34] The absence of specific serological assays leaves nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT) as the only viable option for detection of Mgen DNA or RNA.[35] However, samples with positive NAAT for the pathogen should be tested for macrolide resistance mutations, which are strongly correlated to azithromycin treatment failures, owing to rapid rates of mutation of the pathogen.[6] Mutations in the 23S rRNA gene of Mgen have been linked with clinical treatment failure and high level in vitro macrolide resistance.[36] Macrolide resistance mediating mutations have been observed in 20-50% of cases in the UK, Denmark, Sweden, Australia, and Japan.[6] Resistance is also developing towards the second-line antimicrobials like fluoroquinolone.[37]
According to the European guidelines, the indication for commencement of diagnosis for Mgen infection are:[35]
Detection of nucleic acid (DNA and/or RNA) specific for Mgen in a clinical specimen
Current partners of individuals who tested positive for Mgen should be treated with the same antimicrobial as the index patient
If current partner does not attend for evaluation and testing, treatment with the same regimen as given to the index patient should be offered on epidemiological grounds
On epidemiological grounds for sexual contacts in the previous 3 months; ideally, specimens for a Mgen NAAT should be collected before treatment and treatment should not be given before the result are available
Screening for Mgen with a combination of detection and macrolide resistance mutations will provide the adequate information required to develop personalised antimicrobial treatments, in order to optimise patient management and control the spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR).[35][38]
Detection of resistance
Owing to the widespread macrolide resistance, samples that are positive for Mgen should ideally be followed up with an assay capable of detecting mutations that mediate antimicrobial resistance. The European Guideline on Mgen infections, in 2016,[39] recommended complementing the molecular detection of Mgen with an assay capable of detecting macrolide resistance-associated mutations.[citation needed]
Treatment
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends a step-wise treatment approach for Mycoplasma genitalium with doxycycline for 7 days followed immediately by a 7-day course of moxifloxacin as the preferred therapy due to high rates of macrolide resistance.[40][41][42] If resistance assay testing is available, and the Mgen is sensitive to macrolides, the CDC recommends a 7-day course of doxycycline followed by a 4-day course of azithromycin.[40] Although the majority of M. genitalium strains are sensitive to moxifloxacin, resistance has been reported, and potential for serious, adverse side effects should be considered with this regimen. [43] Floroquinolones, including Moxifloxacin, have been associated with disabling and potentially irreversible serious adverse reactions that have occurred together including:[citation needed]
Tendinitis and tendon rupture
Peripheral Neuropathy
Central nervous system effects
and other serious side effects detailed in the FDA black box warning. Moxifloxacin/Avelox should be reserved for use when patients have no other treatment options. [44]
In settings without access to resistance testing, or if Moxifloxacin cannot be used, the CDC recommends as an alternative regimen: 7 days of doxycycline followed by the 4-day course of azithromycin, with a test of cure 21 days after treatment being required due to the high rate of macrolide resistance. Beta lactam antibiotics are not effective against Mgen as the organism lacks a cell wall.[42]
In the UK the British Association for Sexual Health and HIV (BASHH) guidelines for treatment are:[45]
Doxycycline 100mg twice a day for seven days followed by azithromycin 1 gram orally as a single dose then 500mg orally once daily for 2 days where organism is known to be macrolide-sensitive or where resistance status is unknown.
Moxifloxacin 400mg orally once daily for 10 days if organism known to be macrolide-resistant or where treatment with azithromycin has failed.
Treatment of Mycoplasma genitalium infections is becoming increasingly difficult due to rapidly growing antimicrobial resistance.[46] Diagnosis and treatment is further hampered by the fact that Mycoplasma genitalium infections are not routinely tested.[47] Studies have demonstrated that a 5-day course of azithromycin has a superior cure rate compared to a single, larger dose. Further, a single dose of azithromycin can lead to the bacteria becoming resistant to azithromycin.[48] Among Swedish patients, doxycycline was shown to be relatively ineffective (with a cure rate of 48% for women and 38% for men); and treatment with a single dose of azithromycin is not prescribed due to it inducing antimicrobial resistance. The five-day treatment with azithromycin showed no development of antimicrobial resistance.[49] Based on these findings, UK doctors are moving to the 5-day azithromycin regimen. Doxycycline is also still used, and moxifloxacin is used as a second-line treatment in case doxycyline and azithromycin are not able to eradicate the infection.[50][51]
In patients where doxycycline, azithromycin and moxifloxacin all failed, pristinamycin has been shown to still be able to eradicate the infection.[50]
History
Mycoplasma genitalium was originally isolated in 1980 from urethralspecimens of two male patients with non-gonococcal urethritis in the genitourinary medicine (GUM) clinic at St Mary's Hospital, Paddington, London.[52][53] It was reported in 1981 by a team led by Joseph G. Tully.[9] Under electron microscopy, it appears as a flask-shaped cell with a narrow terminal portion that is crucial for its attachment to the host cell surfaces.[54] The bacterial cell is slightly elongated somewhat like a vase, and measures 0.6–0.7 μm in length, 0.3–0.4 μm at the broadest region, and 0.06–0.08 μm at the tip. The base is broad while the tip is stretched into a narrow neck, which terminates with a cap. The terminal region has a specialised region called nap, which is absent in other mycoplasmas. Serological tests indicated that the bacterium was not related to known species of Mycoplasma. The comparison of genome sequences with other urinogenital bacteria, such as M. hominis and Ureaplasma parvum, revealed that M. genitalium is significantly different, especially in the energy-generating pathways, although it shared a core genome of ~250 protein-encoding genes.[55]
In 2018, Gupta et al. proposed to change the name of Mycoplasma genitalium to Mycoplasmoides genitalium on phylogenetic grounds, reflecting the existing knowledge that M. genitalium is not very related to other Mycoplasma.[1] The change became correct name under the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes (ICNP, "Code") with Validation List 184, published by the ICSP ("Committee").[56] Mycoplasmaologists working in the field generally oppose this renaming. In 2019, they published an opinion paper arguing that even though the phylogenetic methods are valid, Gupta's renaming scheme causes too many changes, which is impractical and confusing.[57] They cite some essential principles of the Code, such as "no unnecessary new names", "aim at stability of names", and "avoid or reject the use of names which may cause error or confusion".[57] However, the 2019 argument for preserving old names was rejected by the Committee in Opinion 122 of 2022,[58] where it was ruled that the argument incorrectly cited the Code.[56] The Opinion emphasizes that use of an older validly published name remains acceptable under the Code.[58]
Synthetic genome
On 6 October 2007, Craig Venter announced that a team of scientists led by Nobel laureate Hamilton Smith at the J. Craig Venter Institute had successfully constructed synthetic DNA with which they planned to make the first synthetic genome. Reporting in The Guardian, Venter said that they had stitched together a DNA strand containing 381 genes, consisting of 580,000 base pairs, based on the genome of M. genitalium.[59] On 24 January 2008, they announced the successful creation of a synthetic bacterium, which they named Mycoplasma genitalium JCVI-1.0 (the name of the strain indicating J. Craig Venter Institute with its specimen number).[60] They synthesised and assembled the complete 582,970-base pair genome of the bacterium. The final stages of synthesis involved cloning the DNA into the bacterium E. coli for nucleotide production and sequencing. This produced large fragments of approximately 144,000 base pairs or 1/4th of the whole genome. Finally, the products were cloned inside the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae to synthesize the 580,000 base pairs.[61][62] The molecular size of the synthetic bacterial genome is 360,110 kilodaltons (kDa). Printed in 10-point font, the letters of the genome cover 147 pages.[63]
On 20 July 2012, Stanford University and the J. Craig Venter Institute announced successful simulation of the complete life cycle of a Mycoplasma genitalium cell, in the journal Cell.[64] The entire organism is modeled in terms of its molecular components, integrating all cellular processes into a single model. Using object oriented programming to model the interactions of 28 categories of molecules, including DNA, RNA, proteins, and metabolites, and running on a 128 computer Linux cluster, the simulation takes 10 hours for a single M. genitalium cell to divide once—about the same time the actual cell takes—and generates half a gigabyte of data.[65]
Research
The discovery of Protein M, a new protein from M. genitalium, was announced in February 2014.[66] The protein was identified during investigations on the origin of multiple myeloma, a B-cell hematologic neoplasm. To understand the long-term Mycoplasma infection, it was found that antibodies from multiple myeloma patients' blood were recognised by M. genitalium. The antibody reactivity was due to a protein never known before, and is chemically responsive to all types of human and nonhuman antibodies available. The protein is about 50 kDa in size, and composed of 556 amino acids.[67] Mgen evolved from a gram-positive ancestor that was clostridium-like but has lost the genes to code for the enzymes involved in de novo nucleic acid synthesis, amino acid synthesis, and synthesis of fatty acids.[68] This means that Mgen needs the host's growth factors to keep reproducing. Although Mgen has abilities that help it adhere to cells, it is still unknown how the bacteria can maintain an infection inside the epithelial cells of the ectocervix and vagina when shedding of the apical layer of cells occur. The organism's ability to have adhesion to host cells relies of two proteins, P110 and P140. Adhesion is an important step in beginning an infection in a cell and Mgen can adhere to spermatozoa, erythrocytes, and epithelial cells. The terminal organelle relies on these proteins as well because without them the organelle was not present. The segmented pair plates of Mgen[vague] is a core of dense electrons which is anchored to the cell membrane. The end of this core is in contact with the wheel complex and the wheel complex contains the proteins MG219, MG200, MG386, and MG491 which aid in the gliding motility of the bacteria. Although Mgen lacks secreted virulence factors, the protein MG186 degrades host nucleic acids due to it being a calcium-dependent membrane-associated nuclease.[citation needed]
^ abWeinstein SA, Stiles BG (1 January 2012). "Recent perspectives in the diagnosis and evidence-based treatment of Mycoplasma genitalium". Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy. 10 (4): 487–499. doi:10.1586/eri.12.20. ISSN1478-7210. PMID22512757. S2CID207218803.
^World Health Organization (WHO). Laboratory diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections, including human immunodeficiency virus. Switzerland: World Health Organization 2013
^Barberá M, et al. Mycoplasma genitalium macrolide and fluoroquino-lone resistance: prevalence and risk factors among a 2013–2014 cohort of patients in Barcelona Sexually Transmitted Diseases: Spain, 2017; In Press
^Manhart LE (2013). "Mycoplasma genitalium: An emergent sexually transmitted disease?". Infectious Disease Clinics of North America. 27 (4): 779–792. doi:10.1016/j.idc.2013.08.003. PMID24275270.
^Schorge JO, Halvorson LM, Schaffer JI, Corton MM, Bradshaw KD, Hoffman BL (22 April 2016). Williams gynecology. Schorge, John O.,, Hoffman, Barbara L.,, Bradshaw, Karen D.,, Halvorson, Lisa M.,, Schaffer, Joseph I.,, Corton, Marlene M. (Third ed.). New York. p. 65. ISBN978-0-07-184908-1. OCLC944920918.((cite book)): CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
^Lis R, Rowhani-Rahbar A, Manhart LE. Mycoplasma genitalium infection and female reproductive tract disease: a meta-analysis. Clin InfeAIDSct Dis. 2015;61(3):418-426
^Weinstein SA, Stiles BG (2013). "Recent perspectives in the diagnosis and evidence-based treatment of". Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy. 10 (4): 487–499. doi:10.1586/eri.12.20. PMID22512757. S2CID207218803.
^Jensen JS, et al. (2008). "Azithromycin Treatment Failure in Mycoplasma genitalium–Positive Patients with Nongonococcal Urethritis Is Associated with Induced Macrolide Resistance". Clin. Infect. Dis. 47 (12): 1546–1553. doi:10.1086/593188. PMID18990060.
^Unemo, M. & Jensen, J.S. ‘Antimicrobial-resistant sexually transmitted infections: gonorrhoea and Mycoplasma genitalium’. 2016. Nat. Rev. Urol..268. Published online 10 January 2017. doi:10.1038/nrurol
^Tabrizi SN et al. Multiplex Assay for Simultaneous Detection of Mycoplasma genitalium and Macrolide Resistance Using PlexZyme and PlexPrime Technology. PLoS ONE. 2016. 11(6): e0156740. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0156740
^ abObafemi OA, Rowan SE, Nishiyama M, Wendel KA (March 2024). "Mycoplasma genitalium: Key Information for the Primary Care Clinician". Med Clin North Am. 108 (2): 297–310. doi:10.1016/j.mcna.2023.07.004. PMID38331481.
^"Yaws"(PDF). World Health Organization. 2013. Archived(PDF) from the original on 29 November 2021. Retrieved 8 December 2017.
^Suneta S, Parkhouse A, Gillian D (24 April 2017). "Macrolide and quinolone-resistant Mycoplasma genitalium in a man with persistent urethritis: the tip of the British iceberg?". Sexually Transmitted Infections. 93 (8): sextrans–2016–053077. doi:10.1136/sextrans-2016-053077. PMID28438948. S2CID9178150.
^Gibson DG, Benders GA, Andrews-Pfannkoch C, Denisova EA, Baden-Tillson H, Zaveri J, Stockwell TB, Brownley A, Thomas DW, Algire MA, Merryman C, Young L, Noskov VN, Glass JI, Venter JC, Hutchison CA, Smith HO (2008). "Complete Chemical Synthesis, Assembly, and Cloning of a Mycoplasma genitalium Genome". Science. 319 (5867): 1215–1220. Bibcode:2008Sci...319.1215G. doi:10.1126/science.1151721. PMID18218864. S2CID8190996.