In statistics and probability theory, a **point process** or **point field** is a collection of mathematical points randomly located on a mathematical space such as the real line or Euclidean space.^{[1]}^{[2]}
Point processes can be used for spatial data analysis,^{[3]}^{[4]} which is of interest in such diverse disciplines as forestry, plant ecology, epidemiology, geography, seismology, materials science, astronomy, telecommunications, computational neuroscience,^{[5]} economics^{[6]} and others.

There are different mathematical interpretations of a point process, such as a random counting measure or a random set.^{[7]}^{[8]} Some authors regard a point process and stochastic process as two different objects such that a point process is a random object that arises from or is associated with a stochastic process,^{[9]}^{[10]} though it has been remarked that the difference between point processes and stochastic processes is not clear.^{[10]} Others consider a point process as a stochastic process, where the process is indexed by sets of the underlying space^{[a]} on which it is defined, such as the real line or -dimensional Euclidean space.^{[13]}^{[14]} Other stochastic processes such as renewal and counting processes are studied in the theory of point processes.^{[15]}^{[10]} Sometimes the term "point process" is not preferred, as historically the word "process" denoted an evolution of some system in time, so point process is also called a random point field.^{[16]}

Point processes on the real line form an important special case that is particularly amenable to study,^{[17]} because the points are ordered in a natural way, and the whole point process can be described completely by the (random) intervals between the points. These point processes are frequently used as models for random events in time, such as the arrival of customers in a queue (queueing theory), of impulses in a neuron (computational neuroscience), particles in a Geiger counter, location of radio stations in a telecommunication network^{[18]} or of searches on the world-wide web.

In mathematics, a point process is a random element whose values are "point patterns" on a set *S*. While in the exact mathematical definition a point pattern is specified as a locally finite counting measure, it is sufficient for more applied purposes to think of a point pattern as a countable subset of *S* that has no limit points.^{[clarification needed]}

To define general point processes, we start with a probability space , and a measurable space where is a locally compact second countable Hausdorff space and is its Borel σ-algebra. Consider now an integer-valued locally finite kernel from into , that is, a mapping such that:

- For every , is a locally finite measure on .
^{[clarification needed]} - For every , is a random variable over .

This kernel defines a random measure in the following way. We would like to think of as defining a mapping which maps to a measure (namely, ), where is the set of all locally finite measures on . Now, to make this mapping measurable, we need to define a -field over . This -field is constructed as the minimal algebra so that all evaluation maps of the form , where is relatively compact, are measurable. Equipped with this -field, then is a random element, where for every , is a locally finite measure over .

Now, by *a point process* on we simply mean *an integer-valued random measure* (or equivalently, integer-valued
kernel) constructed as above.
The most common example for the state space *S* is the Euclidean space **R**^{n} or a subset thereof, where a particularly interesting special case is given by the real half-line [0,∞). However, point processes are not limited to these examples and may among other things also be used if the points are themselves compact subsets of **R**^{n}, in which case *ξ* is usually referred to as a *particle process*.

It has been noted^{[citation needed]} that the term *point process* is not a very good one if *S* is not a subset of the real line, as it might suggest that ξ is a stochastic process. However, the term is well established and uncontested even in the general case.

Every instance (or event) of a point process ξ can be represented as

where denotes the Dirac measure, *n* is an integer-valued random variable and are random elements of *S*. If 's are almost surely distinct (or equivalently, almost surely for all ), then the point process is known as *simple*.

Another different but useful representation of an event (an event in the event space, i.e. a series of points) is the counting notation, where each instance is represented as an function, a continuous function which takes integer values: :

which is the number of events in the observation interval . It is sometimes denoted by , and or mean .

Main article: Intensity measure |

The *expectation measure* *Eξ* (also known as *mean measure*) of a point process ξ is a measure on *S* that assigns to every Borel subset *B* of *S* the expected number of points of *ξ* in *B*. That is,

The *Laplace functional* of a point process *N* is a
map from the set of all positive valued functions *f* on the state space of *N*, to defined as follows:

They play a similar role as the characteristic functions for random variable. One important theorem says that: two point processes have the same law if their Laplace functionals are equal.

Main article: Moment measure |

The th power of a point process, is defined on the product space as follows :

By monotone class theorem, this uniquely defines the product measure on The expectation is called the th moment measure. The first moment measure is the mean measure.

Let . The *joint intensities* of a point process w.r.t. the Lebesgue measure are functions such that for any disjoint bounded Borel subsets

Joint intensities do not always exist for point processes. Given that moments of a random variable determine the random variable in many cases, a similar result is to be expected for joint intensities. Indeed, this has been shown in many cases.^{[2]}

A point process is said to be *stationary* if has the same distribution as for all For a stationary point process, the mean measure for some constant and where stands for the Lebesgue measure. This is called the *intensity* of the point process. A stationary point process on has almost surely either 0 or an infinite number of points in total. For more on stationary point processes and random measure, refer to Chapter 12 of Daley & Vere-Jones.^{[2]} Stationarity has been defined and studied for point processes in more general spaces than .

We shall see some examples of point processes in

Main article: Poisson point process |

The simplest and most ubiquitous example of a point process is the *Poisson point process*, which is a spatial generalisation of the Poisson process. A Poisson (counting) process on the line can be characterised by two properties : the number of points (or events) in disjoint intervals are independent and have a Poisson distribution. A Poisson point process can also be defined using these two properties. Namely, we say that a point process is a Poisson point process if the following two conditions hold

1) are independent for disjoint subsets

2) For any bounded subset , has a Poisson distribution with parameter where denotes the Lebesgue measure.

The two conditions can be combined and written as follows : For any disjoint bounded subsets and non-negative integers we have that

The constant is called the intensity of the Poisson point process. Note that the Poisson point process is characterised by the single parameter It is a simple, stationary point process. To be more specific one calls the above point process a homogeneous Poisson point process. An inhomogeneous Poisson process is defined as above but by replacing with where is a non-negative function on

A Cox process (named after Sir David Cox) is a generalisation of the Poisson point process, in that we use random measures in place of . More formally, let be a random measure. A Cox point process driven by the random measure is the point process with the following two properties :

- Given , is Poisson distributed with parameter for any bounded subset
- For any finite collection of disjoint subsets and conditioned on we have that are independent.

It is easy to see that Poisson point process (homogeneous and inhomogeneous) follow as special cases of Cox point processes. The mean measure of a Cox point process is and thus in the special case of a Poisson point process, it is

For a Cox point process, is called the *intensity measure*. Further, if has a (random) density (Radon–Nikodym derivative) i.e.,

then is called the *intensity field* of the Cox point process. Stationarity of the intensity measures or intensity fields imply the stationarity of the corresponding Cox point processes.

There have been many specific classes of Cox point processes that have been studied in detail such as:

- Log-Gaussian Cox point processes:
^{[19]}for a Gaussian random field - Shot noise Cox point processes:,
^{[20]}for a Poisson point process and kernel - Generalised shot noise Cox point processes:
^{[21]}for a point process and kernel - Lévy based Cox point processes:
^{[22]}for a Lévy basis and kernel , and - Permanental Cox point processes:
^{[23]}for*k*independent Gaussian random fields 's - Sigmoidal Gaussian Cox point processes:
^{[24]}for a Gaussian random field and random

By Jensen's inequality, one can verify that Cox point processes satisfy the following inequality: for all bounded Borel subsets ,

where stands for a Poisson point process with intensity measure Thus points are distributed with greater variability in a Cox point process compared to a Poisson point process. This is sometimes called *clustering* or *attractive property* of the Cox point process.

An important class of point processes, with applications to physics, random matrix theory, and combinatorics, is that of determinantal point processes.^{[25]}

Main article: Hawkes process |

A Hawkes process , also known as a self-exciting counting process, is a simple point process whose conditional intensity can be expressed as

where is a kernel function which expresses the positive influence of past events on the current value of the intensity process , is a possibly non-stationary function representing the expected, predictable, or deterministic part of the intensity, and is the time of occurrence of the *i*-th event of the process.^{[26]}

Given a sequence of non-negative random variables , if they are independent and the cdf of is given by for , where is a positive constant, then is called a geometric process (GP).^{[27]}

The geometric process has several extensions, including the *α- series process*^{[28]} and the *doubly geometric process*.^{[29]}

Historically the first point processes that were studied had the real half line **R**_{+} = [0,∞) as their state space, which in this context is usually interpreted as time. These studies were motivated by the wish to model telecommunication systems,^{[30]} in which the points represented events in time, such as calls to a telephone exchange.

Point processes on **R**_{+} are typically described by giving the sequence of their (random) inter-event times (*T*_{1}, *T*_{2}, ...), from which the actual sequence (*X*_{1}, *X*_{2}, ...) of event times can be obtained as

If the inter-event times are independent and identically distributed, the point process obtained is called a *renewal process*.

The *intensity* *λ*(*t* | *H*_{t}) of a point process on the real half-line with respect to a filtration *H*_{t} is defined as

*H*_{t} can denote the history of event-point times preceding time *t* but can also correspond to other filtrations (for example in the case of a Cox process).

In the -notation, this can be written in a more compact form:

The *compensator* of a point process, also known as the *dual-predictable projection*, is the integrated conditional intensity function defined by

The *Papangelou intensity function* of a point process in the -dimensional Euclidean space
is defined as

where is the ball centered at of a radius , and denotes the information of the point process outside .

The logarithmic likelihood of a parameterized simple point process conditional upon some observed data is written as

^{[31]}

The analysis of point pattern data in a compact subset *S* of **R**^{n} is a major object of study within spatial statistics. Such data appear in a broad range of disciplines,^{[32]} amongst which are

- forestry and plant ecology (positions of trees or plants in general)
- epidemiology (home locations of infected patients)
- zoology (burrows or nests of animals)
- geography (positions of human settlements, towns or cities)
- seismology (epicenters of earthquakes)
- materials science (positions of defects in industrial materials)
- astronomy (locations of stars or galaxies)
- computational neuroscience (spikes of neurons).

The need to use point processes to model these kinds of data lies in their inherent spatial structure. Accordingly, a first question of interest is often whether the given data exhibit complete spatial randomness (i.e. are a realization of a spatial Poisson process) as opposed to exhibiting either spatial aggregation or spatial inhibition.

In contrast, many datasets considered in classical multivariate statistics consist of independently generated datapoints that may be governed by one or several covariates (typically non-spatial).

Apart from the applications in spatial statistics, point processes are one of the fundamental objects in stochastic geometry. Research has also focussed extensively on various models built on point processes such as Voronoi tessellations, random geometric graphs, and Boolean models.