09:4609:46, 19 March 2024diffhist+373
Teil tree
Added certain tags for a needed citation and for requested clarifications. Added a paragraph (with citation) concerning the possible origin of the term "teil tree"Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
09:5409:54, 27 November 2023diffhist+4,378
Pastor
Undid revision 1186997821 by Veverve (talk) Strong, Duffy, Sullivan, Brown, The Catholic Encyclopedia, and Bavinck (9 out of 13 citations added) are not primary sources and are therefore not original research (certainly not "mostly"). The clarify tag also has nothing to do with original research, and should not have been removed. Please do not remove these edits again without stronger justification, and do not start an edit war over this.Tags: UndoReverted
26 November 2023
16:2616:26, 26 November 2023diffhist+4,378
Pastor
Fixed formatting error, added tags for needed clarification and needed citation, and added new information about the interchangeability of the terms "bishop" and "presbyter" in the Early Church (with new citations).Tags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
13:3113:31, 26 November 2023diffhist+58
History of the papacy
→Early Christianity: Added some tags for needed clarification: the sources cited in this paragraph don't clarify which church declaration is being cited (one of the citations is from the recent Vatican II council, but it remains unclear if this council or others are being referenced by this claim) and who views "the college of the Bishops" to be a distinct entity. Also added a hyperlink for "Church Fathers" for necessary context.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
13:1913:19, 26 November 2023diffhist+130
History of the papacy
→Early Christianity: Added some tags for needed clarification and for unsourced claims. Also adjusted some sentences to match the context of other nearby claims (eg, "Peter's claimed successors" to fit with "Many of the bishops of Rome...are obscure figures" and "Peter and those claimed to be his immediate successors").Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
13:0113:01, 26 November 2023diffhist+52
History of the papacy
Made this article more NPOV by noting that the claims made in the intro paragraph (and in several other parts of this article) are specifically from a Catholic perspective.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
10:0110:01, 11 November 2023diffhist+1,139
Ignatius of Antioch
→Ecclesiology: 1. Made the "anachronistic modern sense" clearer to understand, 2. Corrected, cited, and explained (by note) the meaning of "presbyters", 3. Fixed the Lightfoot citation to link more precisely to the relevant material, 4. Added a clause further making clear what the Lightfoot citation states, & 5. Noted an additional way the word "catholikos" can be used.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
02:0102:01, 17 April 2023diffhist+497
Zipporah at the inn
Added some citation needed tags for some unsourced claims. Deleted some text for syntax and lack of citations, clarifying up claims previously made. Added source and citation for new text about other Greek OT translations.
18:5618:56, 29 March 2023diffhist+109
Rock hyrax
The cited source I provided notes that the Hebrew word שָׁפָן was also interpreted as not being the rock hyrax, meaning that it should not be stated here that the word translated as "coney" (lit. rabbit) in the King James Bible definitively refers to the rock hyrax, but rather that it has been interpreted by some as possibly referring to the rock hyrax.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
27 March 2023
22:4022:40, 27 March 2023diffhist+26
Tabernacle
→Subsequent history: Noted that the ESV translation given as to why the Ark and Tabernacle may have been in Bethel for a time is not definitive and is only a possible transation, as other translations translate the word rendered in Judg. 20:28 as "Bethel" (ESV) literally as "house of God."Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
08:2008:20, 13 March 2023diffhist+22
Vetus Latina
Citation needed tag added for an unsourced claim. "Bonae voluntatis" and "consolationis" are not the same words, so, there certainly needs to be a citation that incidates they are synonyms. For example, "in homnibus consolationis" may mean "to men's comfort" (as "consolationis" does not literally mean "will" like "voluntatis" does).
12 March 2023
08:0208:02, 12 March 2023diffhist+8
American Protective Association
→Press: The citation has no title but simply an author, "Preuss." There is no other citation featuring that author's name within this article, so, please clarify which work of Preuss is being cited here.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
22 February 2023
00:1600:16, 22 February 2023diffhist+35
Eponym
→History: Added citation needed tag for an unsourced claim. Also added clarification and fixed typo for the "Gen. 4:1-16" text.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
09:0809:08, 12 January 2023diffhist+6
Dan (ancient city)
→Laish/Leshem: Citation needed tag for an unsourced claim. Brenton's Septuagint translation states "any one" not "Aram" in these verses (Judg. 18:7, 18:28) in agreement with the MT tradition, so is this statement possibly referring to a different Septuagintal manuscript tradition? Hence the very necessary citation needed.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
10:4710:47, 19 November 2022diffhist−505
Eastern Orthodoxy
→Virgin Mary and other saints: Removed several lines of non-NPOV editorializing and fixed some typos and formatting errors, as well as cleaned up some of the writing and added a "which?" tag to an undefined claim. This article is intended only to describe Eastern Orthodoxy.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
09:3209:32, 19 November 2022diffhist+253
Papyrus 967
Added detail to the dating (noting it is dated 3rd century Common Era) and included a citation to a book noting this.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit
18 November 2022
13:2713:27, 18 November 2022diffhist+215
Eastern Orthodoxy
Fixed syntax of a previous edit, and made the paragraph it is in to be NPOV. Corrected a typo. Converted a quotation into a citation. Deleted an NPOV, editorializing statement. Added citation needed tags to unsourced claims. Added a "which?" tag to an unclear claim about a particular "full list of books."
12:3312:33, 18 November 2022diffhist+1,200
Apocrypha
Added info addressing a "which?" tag concerning additional deuterocanonical books, with citation. Added an extra paragraph to the Disputes section about the two different uses of two different uses of the term "deuterocanonical," with citations.
11:4011:40, 18 November 2022diffhist+87
Apocrypha
The cited source is neither scholarly nor NPOV (as required by Wikipedia's reliability guidelines), so a dubious tag is amended to it. The rest of the edited text describes what the as-is non-POV citation actually describes: not evidence of quotations (which would have "it is written" next to them, according to New Testament parlance) but rather only speculation derived from similar words and phrases used in the New Testament. Three other citation needed tags are added to three uncited claims.
11:4211:42, 5 November 2022diffhist+6
Arab sword
→Pre-Islamic: Added a citation needed tag for an uncited claim. Additionally, the Wikipedia article on Thamud gives the civilization a far different date range than this.Tags: Mobile editMobile web edit