17:4517:45, 7 May 2021diffhist−9 m
Allens (law firm)
Remove “top tier” for consistency with changes to wiki pages Australian law firms. This inclusion of the term “top tier” was initially made by me (I.e I am rescinding my change)Tags: Visual editMobile editMobile web edit
12:3312:33, 5 May 2021diffhist+295
King & Wood Mallesons
User removed “top tier” from numerous law firms, including this one, but retained it on rival law firm Clayton Utz. Potential manipulation to boost Clayton Utz at the expense of other firms based on flawed claim of peacock term. The term top tier is used to indicate the position in the market (and types of clients) which those firms operate. The term is not used as a peacock term; the term indicates the reflects of the Australian market. The term is used in the media and industry.Tag: Manual revert
12:3212:32, 5 May 2021diffhist+9
Herbert Smith Freehills
User removed “top tier” from numerous law firms, including this one, but retained it on rival law firm Clayton Utz. Potential manipulation to boost Clayton Utz at the expense of other firms based on flawed claim of peacock term. The term top tier is used to indicate the position in the market (and types of clients) which those firms operate. The term is not used as a peacock term; the term indicates the reflects of the Australian market. The term is used in the media and industry.Tag: Manual revert
12:3112:31, 5 May 2021diffhist+295
Allens (law firm)
User removed “top tier” from numerous law firms, including this one, but retained it on rival law firm Clayton Utz. Potential manipulation to boost Clayton Utz at the expense of other firms based on flawed claim of peacock term. The term top tier is used to indicate the position in the market (and types of clients) which those firms operate. The term is not used as a peacock term; the term indicates the reflects of the Australian market. The term is used in the media and industry.Tag: Manual revert
12:3112:31, 5 May 2021diffhist+295
Ashurst LLP
User removed “top tier” from numerous law firms, including this one, but retained it on rival law firm Clayton Utz. Potential manipulation to boost Clayton Utz at the expense of other firms based on flawed claim of peacock term. The term top tier is used to indicate the position in the market (and types of clients) which those firms operate. The term is not used as a peacock term; the term indicates the reflects of the Australian market. The term is used in the media and industry.Tag: Manual revert
12:2912:29, 5 May 2021diffhist+295
Corrs Chambers Westgarth
User removed “top tier” from numerous law firms, including this one, but retained it on rival law firm Clayton Utz. Potential manipulation to boost Clayton Utz at the expense of other firms based on flawed claim of peacock term. The term top tier is used to indicate the position in the market (and types of clients) which those firms operate. The term is not used as a peacock term; the term indicates the reflects of the Australian market. The term is used in the media and industry.Tag: Manual revert
12:1012:10, 5 May 2021diffhist+1,113
Big Six (law firms)
User seems to have deleted recently added information which was reviewed by three others users and cited. User offered no detailed explanation for their deletions. Page restored.Tag: Manual revert
13:1613:16, 3 May 2021diffhist−156
Big Six (law firms)
→Big Six firms: Removed other two labels as no citation for them (and does not appear to be universally used or even acknowledged). The one label ‘top tier’ is the market and industry label usedTags: Mobile editMobile web edit