21:5121:51, 5 April 2022diffhist+41
Johnny B. Goode
Since there have been no constructive edits since the vandalism (other than my and another user's incomplete attempts to undo it), I've reverted to the pre-vandalism 1 April revision.Tag: Manual revert
23:5823:58, 25 August 2020diffhist+1,298
Goldbach's conjecture
Yes, the second and third statements are equivalent, and my confusion was due to an assertion earlier in the section that the second statement was the weak conjecture. I have fixed that. However, I still do not believe that the first statement is equivalent to the second and third.
16:4816:48, 25 August 2020diffhist0
Goldbach's conjecture
Undid revision 974709147 by Sapphorain (talk) The weak conjecture (expressed by the first two versions) is not known to be equivalent to the strong conjecture; after all, there is a proof of the former but the latter is still open.Tag: Undo
04:1204:12, 4 April 2019diffhist+102
Phonestheme
No such discussion seems to be in Cratylus, but in any case Plato couldn't have been talking about glimmer, gleam, etc., which are not from Greek.
02:5502:55, 22 April 2017diffhist+592
Wedderburn's little theorem
The induction seems to be necessary to show that the centralizer of a non-central element is a field, which is why we can consider A to be a vector space over that centralizer and get that d divides n. Otherwise, all we get is d<n.