03:5103:51, 15 April 2022diffhist−37
Michael Malice
→Podcast: This isn't what the policy refers to. It means you need a secondary source for what people did or said. Your "secondary source" would simply be someone quoting him.
02:1702:17, 16 February 2022diffhist+86
Kharkiv
Doesn't really matter that it's not an "official" language. The Ukrainian constitution protects the use of Russian, widely spoken in Kharkiv
19:5019:50, 2 August 2017diffhist−11,595
User:Grace Note
←Replaced content with 'Wikipedia: where mauvaise foi is your passport to empowerment. Where being a shit is rewarded, but calling a shit a shit is punished.'current
06:5406:54, 5 December 2013diffhist+4
Bozeman Trail
the title of the thing you cite is "Bear River Massacre", so your own source uses that wording and it needs to stay. "Engaged" is totally unacceptable. The source says "attacked". Sorry about removing the cite.
04:3004:30, 3 December 2013diffhist−199
Bozeman Trail
Used wording from the source you provided, which says "attacked" not "engaged" and please refer to Sagwitch in the linked article, who describes a massacre including the murder of babies.
08:4808:48, 23 March 2012diffhist−252
Abortion debate
→Terminology: No it's very clear whose choice is considered important and which life antichoice advocates believe is at stake. This sentence is far too biased to be allowed.