23 February 2009
- 12:0612:06, 23 February 2009 diff hist +924 Talk:Sanskrit →"classical"
7 January 2009
- 15:0815:08, 7 January 2009 diff hist +1,051 Talk:Sanskrit →lead
- 14:5814:58, 7 January 2009 diff hist +343 Sanskrit See talk
16 December 2008
- 09:1109:11, 16 December 2008 diff hist +55 m Indian religions Changed 'apex' to 'sacred most'.
- 09:0909:09, 16 December 2008 diff hist +370 Sanskrit Undid revision 258319152 by Mitsube (talk)
- 09:0809:08, 16 December 2008 diff hist −72 m Talk:Sanskrit →lead
- 09:0709:07, 16 December 2008 diff hist +759 Talk:Sanskrit →lead
- 05:2505:25, 16 December 2008 diff hist +1,855 Talk:Sanskrit →lead
- 04:3604:36, 16 December 2008 diff hist +58 m Indian religions No edit summary
- 03:5403:54, 16 December 2008 diff hist +18 Sanskrit Mitsube, your version too mentions epics as Hindu at some places, besides Sanskrit being a liturgical language of Hinduism. So your reversions are inexplicable.
- 03:4903:49, 16 December 2008 diff hist +338 Sanskrit No edit summary
15 December 2008
- 17:5517:55, 15 December 2008 diff hist +337 Sanskrit Now stop this rigmarole . WP:RS says that Op-ed columns are not RS, but reputed sources (icluding news dailies) are.
14 December 2008
- 13:5113:51, 14 December 2008 diff hist +337 Sanskrit The Indian Express is India's Washington Post. please do some research (even if online)
- 07:5507:55, 14 December 2008 diff hist +337 Sanskrit It is a language of ancient India. And 2900 years back, the writers of Upanisads, Purans & epics never even anticipated the medeival Central Asian term "Hindu", get it ??
12 December 2008
- 11:0311:03, 12 December 2008 diff hist +397 Sanskrit I wrote some of the sentences in this opener nearly 2 years ago. Sockpuppetry is for admins to decide, and not you.
- 01:3301:33, 12 December 2008 diff hist +397 Sanskrit Rather than "Indian classical language", the current version is better. It is more primary an info-nugget than the historical Indo-Aryan Indo-European stuff.
9 December 2008
- 16:5216:52, 9 December 2008 diff hist +397 Sanskrit The first line is cited from Indian Express. Watch and Learn !
- 08:3308:33, 9 December 2008 diff hist +316 Sanskrit It does. It's not just a country-specific honorific, but it indeed is a Classical language. It's roots/origins can be mentioned a LITTLE later on.
8 December 2008
- 16:5716:57, 8 December 2008 diff hist +316 Sanskrit OK for the time being
7 December 2008
- 12:5812:58, 7 December 2008 diff hist +535 Sanskrit This one is better and do take your own advice to not delete relevent ref'd additions.
- 09:0609:06, 7 December 2008 diff hist +632 Sanskrit Wrong again. Per SGPC website, Sanskrit shlokas are included in the Guru Granth Sahib. And please don't hurtle down the "Vedas-not-Hindu" debate once again. By that logic, the epics too arent Hindu.
6 December 2008
- 07:2107:21, 6 December 2008 diff hist +632 m Sanskrit Dude, nothing could be more simpler and lucid than this; besides, the earlier issue was NOT simplicity but the lack of a reference thereof, which I just gave now. Refer to the talk pages
- 06:3606:36, 6 December 2008 diff hist +100 m Sanskrit No edit summary
- 06:2806:28, 6 December 2008 diff hist +4 m Sanskrit No edit summary
- 06:2606:26, 6 December 2008 diff hist +97 m Sanskrit No edit summary
- 06:2306:23, 6 December 2008 diff hist +431 Sanskrit Ended the "classical language" spar with a credible news reference.
- 06:1106:11, 6 December 2008 diff hist +47 m Indian religions No edit summary
- 06:0706:07, 6 December 2008 diff hist +892 Indian religions Section needs repair
- 05:0205:02, 6 December 2008 diff hist +18 m Indian religions →Common traits
12 October 2008
11 October 2008
- 06:5106:51, 11 October 2008 diff hist −14 m Talk:Indian religions →Jains keep Hindu names
- 06:5006:50, 11 October 2008 diff hist +358 Talk:Indian religions →Jains keep Hindu names
9 October 2008
- 09:0109:01, 9 October 2008 diff hist +4,898 Talk:Indian religions →Jains keep Hindu names
3 October 2008
- 17:1717:17, 3 October 2008 diff hist +2,396 Indian religions AnishShah19 Undone. Next's edits only say what the refs state. There's no PoV. Don't vandalize the article by removing cited refs.
28 September 2008
- 06:5406:54, 28 September 2008 diff hist +447 Talk:Sanskrit →Peacock terms
- 06:4606:46, 28 September 2008 diff hist +187 m Sanskrit I think this is how it should be . . .
6 September 2008
- 16:3116:31, 6 September 2008 diff hist −170 m Sanskrit By "India" its meant not just the present "Republic of India", but the larger and nebulous idea of India that has been known since 2 millenia.
- 14:4214:42, 6 September 2008 diff hist −72 m Indian religions The para on Harappan civilization and it's contemplated links with Hind'sm & Jainsm separated. Same thing in different places doesn't make for good read.
5 September 2008
- 18:3718:37, 5 September 2008 diff hist −73 Indian religions No dude, Deussen says it's 1000 BC. Pore the refs carefully.
3 September 2008
- 09:4809:48, 3 September 2008 diff hist +741 Indian religions No edit summary
30 August 2008
- 05:4605:46, 30 August 2008 diff hist −22 Indian religions Per talk. Also, shramana section needs overhaul
- 03:1303:13, 30 August 2008 diff hist +82 m Talk:Indian religions →Next round
- 03:0803:08, 30 August 2008 diff hist +3,154 Talk:Indian religions →Next round
26 August 2008
- 16:5416:54, 26 August 2008 diff hist +1,100 Talk:Indian religions →The National Geographic quote
- 16:4416:44, 26 August 2008 diff hist 0 m Indian religions Date typo
- 16:4316:43, 26 August 2008 diff hist −255 Indian religions Masih sort of coincides with Werner in this ref. Removed the other ref.
- 16:3516:35, 26 August 2008 diff hist +1 m Indian religions Formatting
- 16:3316:33, 26 August 2008 diff hist +977 Indian religions Made intro changes as per talk. The ages of Vedanta needed correction.
