12:3012:30, 1 December 2022diffhist−1
Korean phonology
→Vowel harmony: Ungrammatical example sentence. The nominative particle is attached to the bag, so it should be "this bag buys". If someone has a better sentence do edit it because "this bag buys" sounds funny
06:2606:26, 24 July 2020diffhist+3
Hiragana
changed the god fucking awful picture which was stitched together from kanji and hiragana without any knowledge of calligraphy, based on an actually decent handwritten version
11:4311:43, 11 June 2019diffhist−16
Korean phonology
→Dialectal stresses: Someone changed pitch accent to stress, which is like, inaccurate, but sure because they're kinda similar. But then someone else changed it to nasalization pattern, which is just... wrong... The source doesn't even mention nasalization..?
07:1207:12, 4 February 2019diffhist−2,532
Old Korean
the phonology section makes no sense. Old Korean has no unanimous phoneme inventory but one thing that almost all people seems to agree on is the fact that it didn't have voiced/unvoiced distinction. Old Korean has no enough data to reconstruct such specific phonetic inventory. It has no source, and might confuse people so I am removing it. Wikipedia's not your diary.Tag: section blanking