17:5217:52, 12 November 2013diffhist−464
User talk:Kiefer.Wolfowitz
→AGK: looked (at best) thoughtless. Such public formal behavior suggests that private discussions on the committee would be even worse. As I wrote in 2011, no guide writer supported Hot Stop and most opposed HS. ~~~~
17:5117:51, 12 November 2013diffhist+464
User talk:Kiefer.Wolfowitz
→AGK: looked (at best) thoughtless. Such public formal behavior suggests that private discussions on the committee would be even worse. As I wrote in 2011, no guide writer supported Hot Stop and most opposed HS. ~~~~
17:2817:28, 12 November 2013diffhist+591
User talk:Kiefer.Wolfowitz
→AGK: My banning case had a similar pattern of wild inconsistency. First, Anthony declared himself to have a conflict because of his simultaneous role as an administrator of Wikipedia's IRC channel. Second, he said he would participate because the ca
17:0817:08, 12 November 2013diffhist+135
User talk:Kiefer.Wolfowitz
→ANI notice: Your [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=581278293 know-nuttin' shuckin' & jivin' was ridiculed at ANI] by ((user|Drmies)), with general approval.
17:0017:00, 12 November 2013diffhist+740
User talk:Kiefer.Wolfowitz
→ANI notice: Administrator P*dr* [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=581260113 repeated his accusation that I am a returned user, which he notes he has been making for years].
14:4914:49, 12 November 2013diffhist+194
User talk:Kiefer.Wolfowitz
→Recruiting candidates: Nick and John. Love the monosyllabic names. I attribute past disagreements (e.g., blocks) with Fram and BWilkins partially to my errors, partially to their orneriness (!), and to their burden of blocking scores of nutjobs daily
23:4923:49, 11 November 2013diffhist+277
User talk:Kiefer.Wolfowitz
→Recruiting candidates: Administrators Fram, Bbb23, and BWilkins also could be considered, despite some disagreements (and blocks...). <small> (The division into community leaders and writers relies on my faulty memory and snap judgment, and is immat
23:3523:35, 11 November 2013diffhist+545
User talk:Kiefer.Wolfowitz
→ANI notice: Could you explain why the RfC (and numerous other policies) adopted a policy of requiring that candidates be in good standing? Wouldn't that also be covered in the banning policy? :::::You don't need to describe yourself. Your record on E
23:3123:31, 11 November 2013diffhist+509
User talk:Kiefer.Wolfowitz
→ANI notice: You probably don't remember our discussion on Eric Corbett's talk page. Was Matthew Townshend or another Mattisse puppet involved? :::You might try quoting policy rather than volunteering your "takes".
23:2423:24, 11 November 2013diffhist+635
User talk:Kiefer.Wolfowitz
→ANI notice: The ArbCom Election RfC requires that candidates be in good standing. :The understandable wish that guide writers be in good standing should be discussed in the community discussion following this election (and of course in the RfC before
22:3822:38, 11 November 2013diffhist+401
User talk:Kiefer.Wolfowitz
→Support: Support==== ===== Ks0stm===== Ks0stm has a year more experience of doing good work as an administrator, mostly quietly but sometimes with good will and humor contributing to dispute resolution. The committee has a lot of work to do, and this
20:3120:31, 11 November 2013diffhist+543
User talk:Kiefer.Wolfowitz
→Guitar tunings: Ginger Baker, Bill Frisell, Charlie Hayden=== ((ping|Ceoil)) and ((ping|Dr. Blofeld)) [http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XEpMLiqzZd8]. In this video, Ginger Baker does not sound like Buddy Rich about to throw somebody under the bus. ~~~~