13:0413:04, 16 July 2012diffhist+67
Astrology
No they have not - if you think so raise the issue on the talk page, establish that is the consensus, and follow my suggestion for a request for gaining comment from uninvolved editors. Also suggest you follow my suggestion to you on talk
12:5912:59, 16 July 2012diffhist+921
Talk:Astrology
IRWolfie - You must stop behaving as if you own the article and non-hostile editors may not contribute. Colloboration is not about reverting everything without clear explanation. Specify your reasons for reverting my edit
12:4312:43, 16 July 2012diffhist+67
Astrology
IRWolfie - You have raised concerns about sources not being reliable yourself; talk page is full of concerns about the neutrality of content YOU have developed. Therefore you should not remove this tag - no one should whilst the discussion continues
12:2612:26, 16 July 2012diffhist+67
Astrology
Talk page discussion needs attention and input. Several issues of concern have been raised about the content being affected by bias and the suitability of the content's sources.
11:2611:26, 16 July 2012diffhist−11
Astrology
Precession is not an 'astronomical mistake' - see ongoing talk discussion and proposal to move this section. You should discuss and seek approval before changing topic headers