This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 1 February 2021 and 28 May 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jessica.jfrancis.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:15, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
This article originated here: User:CFCF/sandbox/Anatomical terminology. Its history can be found there. -- Brangifer (talk) 05:59, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
Human anatomical terms redirects here, to see older discussion see Talk:Human anatomical terms -- CFCF (talk) 22:21, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I have proposed this merge because:
--LT910001 (talk) 23:25, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Marking this discussion as closed. There was no consensus for the change, and Anatomical terms of motion is now a featured list. --Tom (LT) (talk) 23:43, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
For general overview:
((cite journal))
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The article Anatomical landmark, as presently written doesn't warrant article status. "Anatomical landmark" is a vague, indefinite term that can describe points of reference in any organ system, not just gross external regions. There is no sense in having a separate article with a title that basically means "anatomical parts in an area of interest". A selection of Google Scholar results for "Anatomical landmark" yields "Antomical landmarks of": radical prostatecomy, femoral nerve block, rhomboid fossa, anterior fontanelle ultrasonography, and sacrospinous colpopexy operations performed for vaginal vault prolapse. A term with such broad usage is hardly worth creating a separate article for. --Animalparty-- (talk) 05:30, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
A merge has been proposed with Supine position (not by me).--LT910001 (talk) 03:03, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
With no consensus for the merge, I'm removing the merge tags and closing this discussion. --Tom (LT) (talk) 23:43, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This term redirects here, but there's no mention of it in the article. I'm not convinced we should redirect arbitrary anatomical terminology here - we should be directing the user to Wiktionary instead. Philipwhiuk (talk) 08:59, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Article appears to directly relate to anatomical terminology, and could be easily represented in a #History or #Society and culture or other section Tom (LT) (talk) 23:53, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
Please see the discussion at File talk:Anatomical position.jpg, where I ask whether the illustration correctly depicts the penis, consonant with the terms 'dorsal' and 'anterior'. yoyo (talk) 14:54, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
I need information - Does detached retina require surfgery?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:206:8102:6000:4511:BA2D:8204:2B9E (talk) 19:07, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
The ref 1 and ref 11 are seems same --DrSorrowMD (talk) 09:43, 11 May 2020 (UTC)