This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Sports and Games This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance). College football Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. National Football League Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Football League, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the NFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Football LeagueWikipedia:WikiProject National Football LeagueTemplate:WikiProject National Football LeagueNational Football League articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. New Jersey Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Arizona Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Arizona (assessed as Low-importance).

Despite a seeming consensus reached both in the discussion on the National Football League Wikiproject page located here: Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_National_Football_League#NFL_biography_infobox as well as a previous discussion about the same subject initiated by the NFL biography infobox template creator located here: Template talk:Infobox NFL biography/Archive 9 about the subject in general about listing more than 1 school, I've been asked to start another discussion here. I believe Turzilli's 4 years spent on the KU football team (compared to 1 at Rutgers) where he played in more than twice as many games as he did at Rutgers, had 3 times as many receptions and more receiving yards than he did at Rutgers, had received academic All-Big 12 honors 2 years in a row at KU, and got his degree from KU rises to the level of being important to understanding his college career which is the criteria listed on the NFL biography infobox page here: Template:Infobox NFL biography and thus warrants being listed in the infobox. I suppose then, I'm supposed to ask for comments from others about whether they agree or not? Kmanblue (talk) 08:22, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support display of both Kansas and Rutgers. Think this was just confusion around display of dual colleges being explicitly allowed. His participation at both schools is significant and relevant in my view (not that we currently have a rigid standard for including both). UW Dawgs (talk) 15:32, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Personally, I wouldn't be opposed to setting a universal guideline project wide. Like anyone who attended more than one. Just so we don't need to repeatedly have this discussion. ^{(talk page stalker)} CrashUnderride 15:43, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]