This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Auld Lang Syne article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 90 days

Template:Vital article

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Scotland C‑class High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles C This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Songs C‑class This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles C This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 4 times. The weeks in which this happened: December 29, 2013 to January 4, 2014 December 28, 2014 to January 3, 2015 December 31, 2017 to January 6, 2018 December 30, 2018 to January 5, 2019

Archives (Index)

1 2 3

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Just reading the 'Burns text' overleaf and see that it differs in several, albeit small, ways from the text in my 1893 copy of the Poetical Works of Robert Burns (The 'Albion' edition) published by Frederick Warne and Co. (Printers Morrison and Gibb Edinburgh).

So just what is the authentic original text? A bit of a mystery for someone to research methinks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.19.55.95 (talk) 12:57, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Morgan Library & Museum, seen at the top of the External links section, offers multiple versions that could claim to be the original one: a manuscript by Burns (dated to 1793); The Scots Musical Museum, which they say is the first publication (1796); and what they say is the first publication with the current tune (1799). —2d37 (talk) 03:13, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In the IPA pronunciation guide in Auld Lang Syne § Lyrics, which aims to describe Burns' own Ayrshire dialect, the 'r' sounds are transcribed variously as an alveolar tap or flap /ɾ/ and an alveolar trill /r/. However, the cited source on "The dialect of Robert Burns as spoken in central Ayrshire" repeatedly says that the 'r' is a trill^{[1]: 11,21,82,180} and, so far as I see, never calls it a tap or flap. I'll BOLDly change the pronunciation guide to use /r/ consistently, to follow what the source says. —2d37 (talk) 08:32, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Soundofmusicals and Getting The Knack: Regarding Special:Diff/997345100 and Special:Diff/997379746, when I saw the former edit in my watchlist, I checked the Dictionary of the Scots Language and found that it indeed says "mug" for "stoup" (and even doesn't say "cup"):^[1]

2. A smaller-sized vessel for holding liquor, sometimes also used as a drinking-vessel, acc. to its size, which varied considerably, a mug, flagon, tankard, decanter (Sc. 1808 Jam.; Cai. 1939; n. and em.Sc. (a), Lnk., Wgt. 1971), freq. with the name of the measure of its capacity prefixed, as chopin-, gill-, mutchkin-, pint-, quart-stowp; hence the measure itself (Sc. 1808 Jam.; Cai. 1939). Obs. or dial. in Eng. Now chiefly hist.

[...]

Ayr. 1788 Burns Auld Lang Syne ii.:

And surely ye'll be your pint stowp! And surely I'll be mine!

I would have added the citation then, but, the "Standard English version (singable)" having no citations anyway, I didn't see where would be least awkward to put such a citation and moved on to other things.

Personally, I don't see much of a difference between saying "pint-cup" or "pint-mug", as the size of the cup/mug is fixed by the preceding word "pint". —2d37 (talk) 08:39, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The source cited for "The dialect of Robert Burns" translates it as "pint-pot",^{[2]: 146–148} but then their translation overall seems strange. (Should old friendship be forgotten / And never brought to remembrance?) —2d37 (talk) 08:51, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Having a closer look at this - there is actually nothing sacred about our "translation" here - it does not, so far as I can see, literally follow a quoted source. Just a word for keeping the current text - it has evolved as a version that makes the meaning of the Scots lyrics clear, while avoiding multisyllabic "dictionary" equivalents that would be awkward to sing. In this respect there seems to be little to choose between "cup" and "mug" - to this non-drinker a "cup" is what you drink tea from, whereas a "mug" suggests coco. "Pot", on the other hand, sounds more like the implement used for cooking porridge! Although I am told that in some places it is an official "pub" measure (more often a half-pint than a full one). A toast is sometimes called a "loving-cup" (or, indeed "a cup 'o' kindness", as here!) - which might be what whoever put together our original "English" version had in mind. How would people (other than Scots, of course, and non-Scots at least making an attempt to sing in dialect) sing this verse? The short answer is they probably wouldn't sing it all - a very large proportion of the people who will be singing it in context over the next twelve hours or so will not go past the "first verse and chorus", when all is said and done. --Soundofmusicals (talk) 13:49, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My answer to your edit summary is "no, not to me", and I make no objection to your position (though, for the last two sentences, that's because I don't feel qualified to comment, being of a culture that doesn't seem to sing the song at all). —2d37 (talk) 13:04, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]