Backlash (2004) is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.Professional wrestlingWikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestlingTemplate:WikiProject Professional wrestlingProfessional wrestling articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
There is no way there was only 13,000 at Backlash. The place was sold out, and Rexalls capacity is in the 16,000 region. I'm going to find a source and change it. This looks like more attempts to make Canada look inferior to the U.S. again. Killswitch Engage (talk) 18:15, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If you can find one, go right ahead. But, until then, it will remain 13,000. –Cheers, LAX 19:39, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
What I'm going to do is see if I can't track down a video of the event, where you hear J.R. clearly say, "over 18,000 on hand for Backlash. Thats an exaggeration, because Rexall only holds like 16,000 people. Can I use a wiki page as a reference for a capacity? I know that wrestling is set up similar to hockey, and the arena holds 16,000+ for ice hockey. Mind giving me a hand on that? Thanks. Killswitch Engage (talk·contribs)
You may not use another Wikipedia page as a source, and you may only use a video if they are not illegally hosting WWE content (meaning YouTube is out of the question). –Cheers, LAX 19:46, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
So I could rip the footage from a DVD and send it to someone as proof? Killswitch Engage (talk) 19:50, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
One spot in the match saw again in the last paragraph (It comes up twice), then Another included,
Again, why? –LAX 01:48, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Aftermath
Wiki-link or explain "Double champion"
I think the term "Double champion" is explained, as it informs that Benoit retained the title and won the World Tag team title. ZenlaxTCS 19:55, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't know what you meant until now. It isn't really explained. iMatthew2008 20:20, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Prior to Raw that night, Bischoff informed Triple H that the following week on Raw, he would have a title match against Benoit what was the result of this match?
I don't quite follow. ZenlaxTCS 19:58, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You're telling me that Triple H would have a title match against Benoit the following week. What happened in that match, and who won? iMatthew2008 20:20, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I saw that match, Chris Benoit won. DoorLearn (talk) 15:05, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Bischoff assured Michaels, but was jumped from behind by Triple H, after Michaels attacked Triple H outside the arena's parking lot it's not clear who Triple H jumped...and use another word instead of "jumped"
'question', if those are supposed to be quotation marks, then use "" not
I'm confused. You mention that Kane received a title match in both paragraphs. I believe it should only be mentioned in the first paragraph. Remove it from the paragraph about Hardy/Lita. Also expand the Hardy/Lita section. How did the feud result?
"problem solver" the quotation marks should not be wiki-linked.
Please see Trish Stratus' article as the example is written there. ZenlaxTCS 20:00, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
'During a tag team match between Jericho and Shelton Benjamin, the tag match between Jericho and Shelton, does not make sense. The tag match between Jericho and Shelton vs. Batista and Ortan.
Numbers in parentheses indicate the length of the match. -- should be small text
The match notes all need to be sourced.
Let me know when you are done. iMatthew2008 01:30, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Additional
I believe 411mania was proven not to be a reliable source, so I'd say all of those references need to be replaced. And change the publishers from "WWE" to "World Wrestling Entertainment" -- iMatthewT.C. 11:16, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It's reliable enough for GAs, but not FAs. –LAX 03:00, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A third feud should be outlined to get a more overview background of the event.
Is that really necessary? There really weren't any other main feuds, nor any back-story to them. –LAX 04:24, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I was told during one on my GA Reviews by an outside WP:PW member that 3 feuds should be outlined. For No Way Out (2004), I had trouble outlining the Mysterio/Guerrero feud, but I did the best I could for it. It doesn't matter if its not a main feud, an undercard match is fine to outline.SRX 11:42, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Before the event went live on pay-per-view, Val Venis defeated Matt Hardy in a match taped for Sunday Night HEAT. - per WP:PW/MOS, HEAT should follow the same rule as iMPACT, and be in regular font format.
The third match of the event was Chris Jericho versus Christian and Trish Stratus in a Handicap match, in which Jericho defeated both Christian and Stratus. - Why is the result shown before hand, while other's aren't in that format.
The match ended when Victoria pinned Lita after an Inside Cradle after Lita got a near fall on Victoria. - the last part "after Lita got a near..." is redundant and not relevant in that sentence.
Assaults by both men took effect, until Orton managed to pin Cactus after an RKO on a barbed wire baseball bat - the first part of the sentence doesn't flow with the rest of it, consider revising.
Edge, however, reversed assaults by Kane, who he then attempted to spear. - attempted "to spear"? remove "to" and reword it into saying that he performed a spear.
I have reword the proceeding sentence, which explains that Kane dodged the spear, causing Edge to spear the referee instead. –LAX 04:24, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That works fine.SRX 11:42, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Aftermath
Written well, I saw no flaws other than jargon, but not to worry for now.
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
Written very good; though a couple of prose issues, until they are addressed, the article is On hold for the time being, good luck in improving the article.--SRX 03:28, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ok great work. Pass--SRX 15:19, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified one external link on Backlash (2004). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 18 January 2022).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Match was announced and billed as No Holds Barred, Falls Count Anywhere Match. Article reads "Hardcore Match"
Small Technicality, wanted to mention before possibly editingLbkid1700 (talk) 23:24, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
So what? That's exactly what a "hardcore match" is. It even says so on the official WWE website. Don't change it. Nickag989talk 18:35, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]