Bella Goth was nominated as a Video games good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (April 26, 2024, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
This article is currently the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 16 January 2024 and 9 May 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Husbn (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Husbn (talk) 17:36, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: Greenish Pickle! (talk · contribs) Cukie Gherkin (talk · contribs) 06:23, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Pokelego999 (talk · contribs) 13:21, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Will hit this up in the coming days. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 13:21, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
1. Article is well-written, albeit confusingly worded.
2. No OR, all info is cited in the article.
3. Coverage is broad in depth and focus. Shows multiple aspects of the character.
4. Article appears neutral, and does not appear to hold a significantly negative nor positive stance on the subject.
5. Article appears stable. Does not appear to have had any major vandalism occur.
6. Article uses two fair use images with proper rationale.
-Looks good
-One of the pre-made characters? What does that mean? Done added words
-What is Strangetown? Done added words
-The dissonance between the two Bellas is confusing and not well explained. What does it mean that there's suddenly a second Bella? Done reworded
-The speculation can likely be cut since it's not official yet. Done removing it.
-"They also felt that Bella's disappearance and the lore surrounding it helped with that" Clarify the end of the sentence since it's very unclear right now. Done
-"In The Sims 4, Bella received attention particularly for her red dress and breasts," A bit weird, but in any case, elaborate, since this is barely acknowledged. Done
-"Gates also discussed how she struggled to feel comfortable wearing dresses, stuck waiting years to be acknowledged as pretty like Bella" Feels a bit unneeded and more about the author than Goth as it's currently phrased. Done removing it.
-"This received controversy," Cut and reword the sentence accordingly, given that the criticism is already acknowledged in the prior sentence. Done
-"her physical features remained largely the same outside of skin color for her, feeling that it was not as good of representation as people may have wanted." How so? This point seems a bit unclear right now. Done removed and reworded a bit.
-"she wanted to move in on Mortimer in Bella's absence, characterized as a gold digger" Reword for clarity, probably to something like "she wanted to move in with Mortimer in Bella's absence due to her characterization as a gold digger." Done
-"depicting the alien abduction." How so? Done removing it. I just added it and thought it cod help before.
-"Untangling the character's story arc was described as a "completely maddening experience" by Elijah Beahm of The Escapist." Is there any further commentary here? Otherwise I'm not really seeing much in terms of actual necessity in being in this paragraph, or at least this late in it. Done nothing more, so I ended up removing it.
-Article feels very confusing to read. Very little is clear and the wordings are mostly ambiguous in nature in regards to a lot of things. Anyone without knowledge of The Sims will struggle to read this. Please reword this adequately, keeping in mind a Sims-less audience. Ping me if you have any questions. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 22:51, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
I'm a little confused, was the idea not that the student was supposed to edit this article as part of an assignment? I also feel that some changes have changed the meaning of commentary in the article by critics. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 01:19, 26 April 2024 (UTC)