Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Z1720 (talk · contribs) 22:54, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Will review shortly. Z1720 (talk) 22:54, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

• Considering that this person is notable for her papercutting creations, the article does not spend a lot of time talking about it, either in the lede or in the body. Is there anyway to expand upon this? Any additional commentary or reviews on her artistic style or creations?

  Unfortunately there isn't a huge amount. Papercutting is rather niche.

• If looking for more sources, some places that I search are WP:LIBRARY, Google Scholar, archive.org, doaj.org, ERIC, and my local library system. You probably know about some or all of these but hopefully additional sources can be found especially commentary about her art.

  I know that there are some articles that I haven't seen, but most of it is obscure. The connection to the notable other people in her life has been written about more than her art.

• Move the information about the children to before 1832, so that it is chronological with the section. It is weird how the article talks about her death, and then about the children.

  Tried to do this, not sure that the list inclusion works.

• Source check: Version reviewed

• Refs checked: 4, 9, 18. The rest are either inassessable or German.

• • Happy to provide copies or translations on request.
• Image review: "Clara Forster by Ludovike Simanowiz.png", "Gottlieb von Greyerz by Georg Volmar, ca. 1805.png", needs a US-PD tag.

  Added one.

Those are my comments. Please ping when the above are addressed. Z1720 (talk) 01:57, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Z1720, thank you for your review! I made some edits, but unfortunately do not have a lot of extra material. —Kusma (talk) 00:00, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• I appreciate adding any extra material you can. Hopefully more will be written about this person in reliable sources that can be used to expand the article. For now, I am happy to pass this. Z1720 (talk) 02:26, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]