This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Bedtime toy was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 10 February 2021 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Comfort object. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
"One Wikipedian's stuffed puppy" - Is this really appropriate? I have no objection to the picture itself, but I think the description ought to be more detached and neutral.
This article is written in a rather trivializing way. I, and I'm sure many other adults - still turn to certain objects for comfort in stressful or otherwise painful situations. --Kinkoblast (talk) 17:07, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
I also found one for the elderly at http://www.elderweb.com/home/node/3088, but the site is offline right now so I thought the one I found would be better. I agree, they're pretty important, and I think there should be more here. I'll glance and see if I can add any more, but I don't have time to go into great detail on one.Somebody or his brother (talk) 13:10, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
They left out something in the pop culture sections, that Mr.Burns from The Simpsons show also has a comfort object known as 'Bobo'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.221.143.13 (talk) 04:53, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
The source (phrases.org) claims that comic strip Peanuts cannot be the origin of the term "security blanket", because "It wasn't until 1956, in "Good Grief, More Peanuts", that the item was given a name by Linus: "This is a 'security and happiness' blanket. All little kids carry them."". And then there is that one newspaper clip from November 1954 where the phrase is used, arguably before Schulz used it. However, that Peanuts quote is actually taken from a sunday strip that was originally published in October 24, 1954 (see it here). And in the strip the line is said by Charlie Brown, not Linus. It would seem that Shulz was first after all, unless there's some other evidence for earlier uses of the term. --Risukarhi (talk) 00:47, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
The two or so large body paragraphs in "In child psychology" don't feel very "Wikipedian" to me, and the lack of sources leads me to think that maybe it's original research? Smortypi (talk) 05:37, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Comfort object. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check))
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:31, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 22 September 2022 and 8 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Olivia0831 (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Olivia0831 (talk) 04:37, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
I removed the following material on My Therapy Buddy because it describes this failed product in terms of how it was hyped but aside from the self-claim of being a transitional object it doesn't otherwise connect to the points being made in this section. By contrast the other items mentioned are supported by research. This reads like an ad, and in any case it is an ad for a failed product that seems non-notable at this point.