This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page: • Hindi Belt Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Hindi Belt |
This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
This page was proposed for deletion by LearnIndology (talk · contribs) on 11 September 2020. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
I proposed to delete this article in past for i was unaware of the term. But this term is overwhelmingly correct. Hope to find some stuff related to it. :) --Onef9day (talk) 12:15, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
Please collect more data for this interesting Article --Swaminworld (talk) 22:56, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
I'm removing the following para as it seems completely unrelated to the topic at hand.
Milk Production
Milk Procurement by Cooperatives In India During 2007-08
Northern States Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, Haryana and Madhya Pradesh — produce almost half of India's milk. But their share in total cooperative milk procurement is slightly over 17 per cent. In contrast to this trend, eastern region of West Bengal, Bihar and Orissa, do not contribute to cooperatives even 5 per cent of the milk produced. In Gujarat, most milk production reaches to cooperative dairy affiliated to Amul accounting to 35 per cent. Similar trend is seen in Karnataka, where Nandini brand process over 26 per cent of the State's milk. Similarly Tamil Nadu and Maharashtra handles 14-15 per cent of their States' milk.[10] But surprisingly Kerala has milk production far short of demand and it depends on milk from outside the State that has been found to be adulterated. States of Tamil Nadu and Karnataka do not supply milk to Kerala.[11][12] Despite one of the greenest state of India, Kerala failed to produce sufficient milk. Government of India has fully funded a Kerala Milk project to make situation better.[13]
Adamgerber80, please try to read the edit summaries before reverting others. As I clearly mentioned in my edit summary, last sourced version was this one. After that revision, only unsourced changes & unexplained blanking of content happened, as you can see from the changes in the revision history from that version to your version – see here. As you see from the revision history, no one added even a single source after that revision, but they did blank/add/alter the content without explanation. The last sourced version is itself quite poor. And that's why I mentioned in the edit summary that it needs a lot of improvement. So it will be better to revert yourself, and then you can start the clean up if you like. - NitinMlk (talk) 18:40, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
The article earlier mentioned the correct names of cow belt states – namely Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar and Madhya Pradesh – and they were backed by sources. But an anon user vandalised it by removing the names of Rajasthan & MP. The name of MP was later restored, but Naren marik added the name of Haryana instead of Rajasthan, obviously without providing any source & that vandalised content has stayed here since 9 June 2016. So beware of any WP:MIRROR which might have appeared after 9 June 2016, as Indian newspapers are notorious for copying content from WP. Anyway, I will restore the sourced name. - NitinMlk (talk) 20:38, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
I will remove the ref 2 & ref 3 from the current version, as they aren't supporting the content of the line to which they are cited. Feel free to read them & add back to the article in case you find some relevant content. - NitinMlk (talk) 20:46, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
The second paragraph of the article was added on 18 February 2010, and is supported by two sources. One of them – indianmelody.com – is WP:UGC, so it cannot be used on this project – in any case it doesn't support the paragraph's content. The other source is fine, but then this one also doesn't support the paragraph's content at all. I even checked its archived version dated 19 February 2010, but it has nothing to support the paragraph. So I am removing this paragraph, as it seems mostly based on original research, and is propagating misinformation since 2010. If anyone is against the removal, then please provide the relevant reliable source(s) here. Similarly, the last line of the current version is unsourced since 2010. So I am deleting that as well. Feel free to partially/fully reinstate the content after citing reliable sources. - NitinMlk (talk) 21:36, 10 June 2018 (UTC)