This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Pornography Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Biography: Actors and Filmmakers This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers. An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article. Women This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles New York (state) Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination: No consensus, July 30, 2024, see discussion. Nomination withdrawn, 2007-12-19, see discussion.

The posted picture IS NOT Darby Lloyd Rains. I was a fan during her career and she was a medium built blonde. The lady pictured in the article appears to be a circa-1980s actress .

Agree. Deleted. See http://www.mondo-digital.com/henryparis.html for pictures of her. Bollar (talk) 00:43, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Darby Lloyd Rains. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090217224221/http://iafd.com:80/person.rme/perfid=DLRains/gender=f/darby-lloyd-rains.htm to http://www.iafd.com/person.rme/perfid=DLRains/gender=f/Darby-Lloyd-Rains.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ((Sourcecheck))).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:38, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr vulpes hello and thank you for your edits on the page. However I strongly disagree with your massive removal of material from the filmography. Most of those films are notable/of interest imv (see @Somebodyidkfkdt's comment at the Afd, about some of them) and I had sourced every one of them anyway. Would you please do me a favour and reinstate them? Thank you. I've reinstated them. Not to mention the work that was necessary to add them, they also tend to prove she was a prolific actress and are of encyclopaedic value regarding her career (mention of directors, dates). I understand, I think, that the idea was to have the page look more concise. But why should it be so? -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 09:03, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]