GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi! I will be reviewing this article. Check back for further comments. ♥NiciVampireHeart17:47, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quck fail criteria

[edit]
  1. Has reliable sources
  2. Is written neutrally
  3. No valid cleanup tags
  4. Is relatively stable with no edit wars
  5. Not specifically concerned with a rapidly unfolding current event with a definite endpoint

The article passes quick fail criteria. A more detailed review will follow. ♥NiciVampireHeart23:18, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Full review

[edit]
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
Criterion 1a - prose
I reworded it a bit differently


Criterion 1b - MoS


Criterion 2a - references
Done, however, when I click the UEFA Euro 2008 links on the site you gave, some don't work but when I try click them on the wiki page there's no problem so I decided to leave them.


Criterion 2c - original research


Criterion 4 – neutrality


Overall comments

Replies

Just a note, brace used to have a wiki page but it does not seem to exist anymore. A brace = 2 goals. Paper Back Writer 23 (talk) 16:58, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Can you say that in the article then? At the first instance where brace is mentioned, put "(2 goals)" immediately afterwards just to clarify what it actually means. ♥NiciVampireHeart13:45, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Done, gonna get round to finishing off the article, kinda hoping someone will help :D Paper Back Writer 23 (talk) 22:03, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Saw that, great work Paper Back Writer 23 (talk) 22:03, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

<--I don't ind you taking a little bit of time to get the article done. A normal hold period is a week, but I have no problem extending that as long as the article is being actively improved. Keep going, you're getting there. :) By the way, you could try asking for some extra help at WT:FOOTY if you'd like someone else to pitch in. ♥NiciVampireHeart23:40, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I'd recommend asking there too. There are people there with many GAs who can help with copy editing and references, they might take some credit though. Spiderone 16:18, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replies

Comment

Final read-through

[edit]