This article is within the scope of WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist Church, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Seventh-day Adventist Church on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Seventh-day Adventist ChurchWikipedia:WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist ChurchTemplate:WikiProject Seventh-day Adventist ChurchSeventh-day Adventist Church articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bibliographies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bibliographies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibliographiesWikipedia:WikiProject BibliographiesTemplate:WikiProject BibliographiesBibliographies articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Actually, let me expand on it just a bit. I think the proposed title just flows better, and makes more sense. It is particularly important for an author like Ellen White, who wrote a large amount of material that has never been published but remains studied by the Adventist church. Taking it further, does the "writings of" title suggest the list should contain every email composed by a one of the novelists? I think bibliography is a much better fit for the purpose of the list. So while I certainly agree with the nominator regarding consistency, I also think the titles should be changed for their own sakes. 78.26(spin me / revolutions) 03:04, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per WP:CONSISTENT. — SMcCandlish☏¢ 😼 06:20, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination and all four of the above "support" votes. —Roman Spinner(talk • contribs) 00:18, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]