Foremost pioneer

[edit]

While I have no reason to doubt that Garris helped with LRC, the rest of this statement makes bold assertions that we'd need to attribute to a notable source. -Willmcw 16:50, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This entry is promotional fluff in most respects. It also refers to lewrockwell.com as a “prominent” web site, but today its ranking among all US web sites is 10,954th. Antiwar.com is ranked 34,343rd (Alexa). Nicmart (talk) 19:05, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Briggs lawsuit

[edit]

The article mentions that Garris was one who sued Briggs for absenting himself from a debate. The lawsuit had some sort of resolution or withdrawn. Unless that information is included, the statement should be removed. Nicmart (talk) 19:07, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Non-partisan"?

[edit]

It seems like a major stretch of the word "non-partisan" to use it to describe AntiWar.com here, given the very clear conservative bent of its founders. Being willing to criticize both parties is not "non-partisan," as one can - and these folks apparently do - criticize the Republican party from the right; the section about libertarian dissatisfaction, for instance, does not mention that they considered an entryist strategy towards the Democratic party. 2600:1004:B1A3:85B9:D5B3:90AC:42F:70E9 (talk) 13:54, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]