This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Why was the subject rechanged into Estonian Kroon when by WikiProject Numismatics style, which states, "If the currency is listed at ISO 4217, use the name given there.", it should be just Kroon, and in fact it is given the name Kroon, not Estonian Kroon? Why wasn't Estonian Kroon redirection to Kroon enough? --Telempe 23:35, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
Why is Estonian grammar used in an English article? --Telempe 19:08, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
The nominative plural is formed so as you described. But you can't say e.g. "Mul on kaks kroonid" for "I have two krooni", you must use the partitive case. The correct match is: "Mul on kaks krooni". See: Estonian grammar in Wikipedia. --Juhan 22:01, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
In English, is "kroon" pronounced with English phonetics (rhymes with boon) or as it is in Estonian (like "kron")? Deco 23:36, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
In Estonian "kroon" is pronounced as "kroon" (both o-s are pronounced and the emphasis is on the first syllable).--Juhan 19:36, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
I believe there is a language misunderstanding. You have used word senti, what is derived from Estonian word sent. According to Estonian-English-Estonian dictionary produced by Estonian Language Institute, in Estonian language, sent means cent. Therefore there shouldn't be not 100 senti, but 100 cents. --Tarmo Tanilsoo 19:03, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
It says: "Band pegged in practice, 15% de jure" Isn't it pegged with a 0% band de jure according to some Estonian government/central bank decision, and pegged with a 15% band de jure according to EU's ERM II system? (212.247.11.153 20:55, 18 April 2007 (UTC))
EEK does not use pegging band. 15% band is the band within a currency in the ERM II system must be at least for 2 years to fulfill Maastricht convergence criteria. --Juhan 19:36, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
Image:1coronaestone1998front.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 23:56, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Image:1coronaestone1998back.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 23:56, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Is it just me or is the history section a bit long winded? Might it not be better to have such detailed discussion in an article like Economy of Estonia?
Dove1950 (talk) 21:17, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:22, 14 October 2018 (UTC)