This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Is there a template that says this is one of the worst articles on WP? GenslerOnCities was probably correct in not editing due to COI, but the below article is much better than what is there, and perhaps some material from the existing article could be merged into it. Perhaps I'll do it when I'm back from vacation. OOPS as of September 10: I should have looked at the history before I wrote this; one undo would have fixed the article. Very un-WP. Perhaps I'll look into merging some from the below later. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.19.247.131 (talk) 19:02, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
69.19.247.51 (talk) 17:20, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
My name is Leah and I work for Gensler. I recognize that since I work for Gensler I have a clear conflict of interest and will utilize the talk pages to discuss comments regarding the article.
I have created a new proposed article about Gensler that is updated and meets quality and sourcing standards compared to the current article. There are too many edits for this page to ask an editor to painstakingly change them one by one. As such, I am suggesting an entirely new article.
Additionally, I’m deleting the last set of recommended changes to the talk page that was made by a Gensler account back in 2010 (GenslerOnCities). These are outdated and did not follow Wikipedia’s rules. Leaving them up in the talk page may be confusing based on this new round of suggested edits.
My intent is not to transform this article into a glowing review of Gensler. Rather, I would like to make sure it is up to date and reflects general consensus.
Hi, it’s Leah again from Gensler. Since I haven’t heard any feedback on this (either supportive or constructive) I just wanted to come back to the talk pages to state that I plan on making the edits directly to the page that I suggested. I’ll wait another week or two for feedback or thoughts, but will then go in and post the updated edits maintaining transparency and acknowledgment that I have a clear conflict of interest. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LeahR11 (talk • contribs) 21:42, 31 October 2012 (UTC)
An IP has repeatedly inserted a link to the Gensler blog in the external links section. WP:ELOFFICIAL indicates that secondary official website should be listed "only when the additional links provide the reader with unique content and are not prominently linked from other official websites. For example, if the main page of the official website for an author contains a link to the author's blog and Twitter feed, then it is not appropriate to provide links to all three." I think this blog linked, prominently linked from the main Genlser website (along with other Genselr social media links), fits within this ELOFFICIAL prohibition. I will remove it, again. Novaseminary (talk) 04:06, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
My name is Leah and I work for Gensler. I noticed there were a few errors on this page. I realize I have a clear conflict of interest so I wanted to flag for the community first before I make any transparent edits.
The article should read that in 2012, Gensler generated the most revenue of any architecture firm based in the US for the second year in a row (Top 300 Architecture Firms, Architectural Record, July 2013) [1]and that as of 2013, it operates offices in 43 cities in 14 countries worldwide. These are minor edits, but worth noting since they are currently incorrect (Gensler’s Secret Sauce, Metropolis Magazine, June 2013) [2].
Additionally, under the staff section the article should read that as of 2013, Gensler employs more than 3,500 people (Gensler’s Secret Sauce, Metropolis Magazine, June 2013) [3].
Finally, I made some simple edits to the “Notable Gensler Buildings” section with a few more entries and also inserted some updated photos – all cited – to make things more up to date. These are fairly straightforward so did them myself, but please review since I have a conflict of interest here.
LeahR11 (talk) 12:13, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
References
Put a proper company info-box template and added the details. A lot of public info can be added to the article regarding the founding and the projects (images are also available). Renzut
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Chris Johnson (architect). Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk 20:58, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Key people Andy Cohen, co-CEO Diane Hoskins, co-CEO
Andy Cohen's and Diane Hoskins' titles should be changed from "Co-CEO" to "Global Co-Chair”
https://www.archpaper.com/2023/10/gensler-julia-simet-jordan-goldstein-co-ceo-andy-cohen-diane-hoskins-global-co-chairs/ [1]
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
Please add a new sentence at the end of this paragraph: “In 2005, Gensler's board of directors extended the firm's collaborative leadership structure by naming Andy Cohen, Diane Hoskins, and David Gensler as executive directors/Co-CEOs. Cohen and Hoskins continue their tenure as Co-CEOs.[6] In 2015, the firm celebrated its 50th anniversary.”
Please add this new/additional sentence to the end of the above paragraph: "After nearly 20 years of leadership, Cohen and Hoskins transitioned from their roles as co-CEOs to become Gensler’s first Global co-Chairs in 2024; the firm named Julia Simet and Jordan Goldstein as the incoming co-CEOs[2]."
Andy Cohen's and Diane Hoskins' titles should be changed from "co-CEO" to "Global co-Chair” and add the new co-CEOs, Julia Simet and Jordan Goldstein.
Designdork (talk) 17:55, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
References
The user below has a request that an edit be made to Gensler. That user has an actual or apparent conflict of interest. The requested edits backlog is moderate. Please be patient. There are currently 146 requests waiting for review. Please read the instructions for the parameters used by this template for accepting and declining them, and review the request below and make the edit if it is well sourced, neutral, and follows other Wikipedia guidelines and policies. |
Add "and 2022[1]." to this line:
Gensler's “Impact Through Design” report, launched in 2016, explores strategies for architecture and design to play a greater role in global climate change strategy and mitigation,[32] reinforcing this commitment to sustainability with the firm's subsequent “Impact by Design” reports in 2017,[32] 2018,[33] 2019, 2020,[34] 2021.
And also add the following sentences at the end of the same section:
In 2023, Gensler announced the launch of the Gensler Product Sustainability (GPS) Standards v1.0. Starting in January 2024, the standards will be required for all Gensler projects in the U.S., Canada, and Europe[2]. At COP28, Gensler partnered with the International Finance Corporation (IFC) to jointly expand low-carbon building certification and access to green finance[3].
The 2022 Impact by Design report is available. Added Gensler Product Sustainability standard initiative, as well as IFC green finance partnership.
https://www.graphis.com/entry/8f27a188-01f9-4713-a83d-4ee78acbec8d/
https://sustainablebiz.ca/gensler-creates-product-sustainability-standards-for-building-industry
https://pressroom.ifc.org/all/pages/PressDetail.aspx?ID=27908
AMD90038 (talk) 19:41, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
References
The user below has a request that an edit be made to Gensler. That user has an actual or apparent conflict of interest. The requested edits backlog is moderate. Please be patient. There are currently 146 requests waiting for review. Please read the instructions for the parameters used by this template for accepting and declining them, and review the request below and make the edit if it is well sourced, neutral, and follows other Wikipedia guidelines and policies. |
Edit this line: "Engineering News-Record ranked Gensler as the #1 Top Green Design Firm for six consecutive years, from 2016-2021.[48] The firm was second in the latest ranking in September of 2022.[49]" to read: "Engineering News-Record ranked Gensler as the #1 Top Green Design Firm in 2023[1]."
Also Add the following items to the Recognition section:
For the 42nd consecutive year, Gensler received the highest ranking on Interior Design magazine's “Top 100 Giants” list in 2023[2].
Gensler maintained the top position on Architectural Record’s Top 300 Architecture Firms[3] for the 12th consecutive year.
The AIA honored Gensler’s repositioning of Willis Tower with the 2023 AIA National Interior Architecture Award[4] and awarded adaptive reuse project 633 Folsom the 2023 AIA National Architecture Award[5].
The Center for Active Design awarded Gensler with as the company with the “Most Ambassadors” (All Time), as the company with the most Fitwel Accredited staff, in the 2023 Best in Building Health Awards[6].
For the ninth consecutive year, Gensler received the #1 rank overall in Building Design's 2024 World Architecture 100 rankings[7].
Adding the most up-to-date recognition from around the industry.
Interior Design Unveils the 2023 Top 100 Giants
ENR 2023 Top 100 Green Design Firms and Contractors: A Green Market Growth Spurt
Top 300 U.S. Architecture Firms of 2023
Project highlights: Willis Tower Repositioning
Project highlights: 633 Folsom
Fitwel’s 2023 Best in Building Health Awards Announced
WA100 2024: Back to reality for the world of architecture
AMD90038 (talk) 20:23, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
References