This article was nominated for deletion on 22 April 2008. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
The previous which was marked for speedy deletion has been totally deleted, and replaced with a substantive history of the George Mason Law Review, a chronology of the volumes and editors-in-chiefs, award winning writers, and other aspects.
Why exactly is this article significantly more lengthy than either the Harvard Law Review University of Pennsylvania Law Review or Yale Law Journal entries? 70.21.38.201 (talk) 18:28, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
In consideration of your comments, this page has been shortened and edited. Please remove the banner at the top of the page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.174.233.95 (talk) 21:05, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
Are there any particularly famous or influential articles that can be mentioned here? Idag (talk) 04:42, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Does anyone think that the COI still stands? Most of the self-glorifying content has been removed and this article did get a good amount of traffic from the AfD. Staeiou (talk) 14:17, 22 April 2008 (UTC)