China Stub‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles Stub This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

the current name is un correct, the offical website of this town is title as guling, jiujiang. see https://www.jiujiang.gov.cn/zjjj/cyjj/jdjj/201507/t20150715_1454098.html the current title should be changed. 206.119.37.102 (talk) 15:30, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It has been proposed in this section that Guling, Jiangxi be renamed and moved to Guling, Jiujiang. A bot will list this discussion on requested moves' current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use ((subst:requested move)). Do not use ((requested move/dated)) directly. Links: current log • target log • direct move

Guling, Jiangxi → Guling, Jiujiang – the offical website of guling town link is below, it shows clearly guling, jiujiang is better than guling, jiangxi. https://www.jiujiang.gov.cn/zjjj/cyjj/jdjj/201507/t20150715_1454098.html 206.119.37.102 (talk) 15:41, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment It appears very likely that this IP is a sockpuppet of User:Gweilo60, who is currently blocked. 162 etc. (talk) 16:59, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Support. Jiangxi is a province or state, maybe it is too large to put it here. While Jiujiang is a much smaller city that can give a better indication of where the Guling town is located. Also administration of Guling town belongs to Jiujiang, I think Jiujiang can better show the location and administrative area of Guling. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.127.242.90 (talk • contribs)

 Comment: Very likely IP hopping to sway consensus, per User:162 etc.. Silikonz💬 01:45, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Strong oppose per my comment above and the relevant discussion on my talk page. I don't see any reason to violate WP:NCCHINA here. Silikonz💬 01:56, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

can you explain more about the specific reaons? For example, which one is out of compliance? and this can be shown to other editors, instead of being told it's not up to code and it's over? This is the place to talk, right? 206.119.61.75 (talk) 02:30, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Support. The current title is violating WP:NCCHINA. WP:NCCHINA has specific rule regards this, it says "If the name is not unique within the province, disambiguate: A) By the prefecture-level city if the parent division is a district. B) By the county-level city, county, or banner otherwise. Guling is not unique within the province, and it needs to be disambigated by by the prefecture-level city. Clearly Jiangxi is not that city. I strongly suggest to chang e the current title to meet WIKIpedia requirement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.201.87.62 (talk) 03:41, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Could you please inform which other Guling exists in Jiangxi, and back it up with RS? The same editor asked me to prematurely close this RM. I strongly suspect sock. Silikonz💬 04:21, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Postcode shows 江西省赣州市安远县孔田镇古岭村, there is another Guling in Ganzhou.

  摘自: https://youbian.d777.com/LOB6R1BBR 14.201.87.62 (talk) 07:17, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  That Guling does not have an article. Disambiguation in titles doesn't cover such scenarios. It is purely for distinguishing already existing topics. Silikonz (alt)💬 13:00, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  What does it even mean? There are multiple Gulings exist in Jiangxi. 14.201.87.62 (talk) 13:06, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  whatever you think, I think you should follow the rule. Thank you. The current name doesn't meet Wikipedia's naming requirement. 14.201.87.62 (talk) 13:38, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]