This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Romania-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomaniaWikipedia:WikiProject RomaniaTemplate:WikiProject RomaniaRomania articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Highways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of highways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HighwaysWikipedia:WikiProject HighwaysTemplate:WikiProject HighwaysHighways articles
I don't get fully why, but some users (mostly not-logged in & thus only showing an IP..) take fun in removing the map from this article.
I agree that sometimes the map is not updated, but that is no reason to remove it, that really makes the page of lower value.
Thus, before someone again removes the map, please discuss here what your issues are with it. I agree specifically that depicting potential future highways can be an issue, but still, removing the map is an approach that is close to vandalism, and not constructive at all !!
MagRudolfMayer (talk) 13:46, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[Fixed] The map is highly misleading. It contains current, in execution, planned, or not even planned (but intended) motorways. At least, it should have a legend that allows to differentiate more easily between what is available and what is not.
I consider that the map is still misleading even with labels added. It should be immediately apparent what is in use, under construction and what is planned. See for example the second map of Poland's highways. How about asking permission to add the map on this website http://130km.ro/romanianhighwaymap.gif ? It is often updated. KenyaSong (talk) 23:24, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I also think this is still misleading and every time I access this page I have the same reaction. It should be included somewhere in the article, but the first thing that pops in your eyes when you open the page should be the current state. Otherwise it's basically false advertising (and yes, I am Romanian citizen) Alexandrujuncu (talk) 20:49, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I have just modified 2 external links on Highways in Romania. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.