India: Cities / Karnataka Start‑class Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Indian cities (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Karnataka (assessed as High-importance).

This is a page for Hubballi. But I see IT industry listing of North Karnataka region. Also, There is Lot of Dharwad related information. Please have separate page for those different subjects. I will remove the content in another few days if nobody removes it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lokesh 2000 (talk • contribs) 14:54, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Mr Lokesh, there not much related information about Hubli, it should be there.

The article has become a mess. several sections should go as separate articles but can have links from main article. for example IT industries of north karanataka, Historical regions in north karnataka, information about dharwad should be in their appropriate article. could anybody do the cleanup? I'm finding no time to do the cleanup.

Lokesh 2000 (talk) 04:17, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

definitely needs a thorough clean up --Crazysoul (talk) 07:58, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The list of IT industries, colleges, real estate developers, etc, seems more like a reference list than a article. It is better to name one or two major companies and move the rest to sub-articles. Anyone with better knowledge of hubli area may take the initiative to do this and give a better shape to this article --Crazysoul (talk) 18:43, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to cleanup messy things in the article but it is still horrible. I think we need to remove the list of IT industries and can add a paragraph describing the present IT scenario in the city. Also, Add more content to tourism section. We need to develop this in the same way as Bangalore article. Lokesh 2000 (talk) 08:22, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There are many links which are no where connected with Hubballi. I guess links are listed for SEO purpose, not for public information. As Lokesh mentioned, it is mess and need serious cleanup. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Phpses (talk • contribs) 13:07, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

,m./n;l',

1. Personalities of Hubli/Hubbali
2. This page has to be specific to Hubballi or Hubli-Dharwad ?
3. References to commercial entities
4. Overall table of content

--Vinayak Kulkarni (Bangalore) (talk) 07:10, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The image Image:Veeragase.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --04:48, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A request that this page title be changed to Hubli is under discussion. Please do not move this page until the discussion is closed.

This is to notify that Hubli hasn't yet been renamed Hubballi Yet.

Refer discussion at the page of Bangalore

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Bangalore/Archive_4#Bangalore_or_Bengaluru.3F

Swaroop (talk) 06:40, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request editors to review content on the website http://www.hubli-dharwad-city-guide.com. I myself own the website and hence it would be wise enough if the same is reviewed. If the website does not provide any additional value to Wikipedia visitors, then the same can be removed.

Thanks. Vishalkumarnjain (talk) 12:18, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really know the policies relating to this kind of external site stuff, but I guess we cannot review it. But personally, I think its a good start for a site, Regards. Swaroop (talk) 12:18, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]