GA Reassessment[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  Fail

This article clearly fails GA. The coverage this article has is less than impressive. There are other problems as well. If you act like a duck and quack like a duck, you are a duck. ~ Destroyeraa🌀🇺🇸 01:34, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to do all of this, though I will try to help around with this. Stay safe, Cyclone Toby 04:02, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lead[edit]

Met[edit]

I am completely rewriting the MH in my sandbox, using more sources and making it larger. Stay safe, Cyclone Toby 12:25, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Preparations[edit]

Impact[edit]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.