This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the International Legion (Ukraine) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 days |
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to Eastern Europe or the Balkans, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about International Legion (Ukraine). Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about International Legion (Ukraine) at the Reference desk. |
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 3 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Does the Ukrainian International Legion have a Special Forces wing?, if so we could add official sources to the article. As of this time it appears to be a ragtag force made out of haste and with a few voluntary detatchments of militias in these desperate times. Wunghuang 19:37, 20 March 2022 (UTC)
I found this on the French wiki[1] and translated it. Can it be useful?
Country | Volunteers killed | Source(s) |
---|---|---|
Georgia | 16 | [1] |
Belarus | 7 | [2] |
Brazil | 3 | [3] |
Azerbaijan | 2 | [4] |
United States | 2 | [5] |
France | 2 | [6] · [7] |
United Kingdom | 2 | [8] · [9] |
Germany | 1 | [10] |
Australia | 1 | [11] |
South Korea | 1 | [12] |
Denmark | 1 | [13] |
Spain | 1 | [14] |
Netherlands | 1 | [15] |
Czech Republic | 1 | [16] |
TOTAL | 41 |
Mhorg (talk) 14:42, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
References
((cite web))
: External link in |website=
(help)
((cite web))
: |first=
has generic name (help)
Doesn't the IFDU qualify as a mercenary group? They aren't official members of the UAF and behave more like Wagner. 209.171.85.51 (talk) 23:10, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
hello fellow wikipedians, it has come to my attention that source 45 is a bad source, as the sources originates from RT/Russia Today. i dont think i need to state that using a source from Russia Today about how Ukrainian recruitment has dropped because of Russian propaganda is a bad origin for sourcing ( the offical source 45 https://www.massnews.com/ukraines-international-legion-suffers-recruit-shortage-analysis/
the actually source of the claim https://www.rt.com/news/559477-ukraine-international-legion-shortage/ ) ThatGuyNamedSeth (talk) 00:54, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
Apologies if this sounds a bit nitpicky, but the official English name of the legion uses the British/Commonwealth spelling. This can be seen on both official websites and even the emblem displayed in the infobox of the article. According to Wikipedia's own guidelines on consistency within articles, in relation to different varieties of English, "proper names use the subject's own spelling, e.g., joint project of the United States Department of Defense and the Australian Defence Force; International Labour Organization". Considering this, shouldn't Defence be the favoured spelling? 2A00:23C6:4195:ED01:5455:599A:AA41:1D8B (talk) 01:10, 13 November 2022 (UTC)