Interstate 180 (Nebraska) has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result October 10, 2021 Good article nominee Listed
	A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 26, 2021. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that reconstruction of Nebraska's Interstate 180 was disrupted by the discovery of nesting migratory birds?

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

U.S. Roads: Interstates / Nebraska Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Topics  Interstate Highways   Locations  Nebraska   This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it. This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists. This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.   United States: Nebraska Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Nebraska (assessed as Low-importance).

This review is transcluded from Talk:Interstate 180 (Nebraska)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 16:18, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I can take a look at this! — GhostRiver 16:18, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Infobox and lede

• "and began construction" → "and construction began" - the subject of the sentence is "It", so current sentence setup makes it look like the highway constructed itself
  • Fixed.

Route description

• Good

History

• "local engineers union" → "local engineers' union"
  • Fixed.
• The word "temporarily" is used three times in two sentences in the paragraph beginning "The southern section from 9th Street"
  • Fixed.
• Missing letter: "1998. he project" → "1998. The project"
  • Fixed.
• "nesting cliff swallow" → "nesting cliff swallows", as the source says multiple birds were found
  • Fixed.
• It feels like there should be another sentence at the end to finish up this paragraph on the 2001-03 construction
  • Reordered to put the project elements last as a wrap-up, and expanded with another sentence on the bird issue.

Exit list

• Good

References

• Good

General comments

• Image is relevant and properly licensed
• No stability concerns present in the revision history
• No copyvio concerns

Just a few quick prose things, plus one area of expansion. Putting on hold for now; feel free to ping me with questions or comments. — GhostRiver 16:31, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@GhostRiver: Thanks for the review. I believe I've addressed all of your concerns. SounderBruce 19:13, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good now, happy to pass! — GhostRiver 19:23, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]