Joel S. Levine is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive. | |||||||||||||
Joel S. Levine has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on March 5, 2021. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Joel S. Levine led a team of 12 NASA scientists to investigate why the U.S. Constitution was deteriorating? | |||||||||||||
Current status: Former featured article candidate, current good article |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
Other talk page banners | |||
|
I'm working on the draft for this page after discovering the work of Dr. Levine, and finding to my surprise that there wasn't anything covering him on this site. I would gladly appreciate any help I can get from others to improve this page, especially with regards to formatting and pictures. Once published, it would probably be worthwhile to add some of the info gathered to other pages, especially regarding the preservation of the Charters of Freedom, which currently has very lackluster coverage on Wikipedia. Yitz (talk) 05:14, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
In order to help both myself and other editors further improve this page, I have decided to compile a list of links to articles I've come across which both mention Joel Levine and haven't been cited or otherwise used in the article itself yet. Feel free to edit or add to this section.
Yitz (talk) 20:10, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
There is an in-colour 2006 NASA portrait of Levine on the Internet Archive, maybe it should be used instead? - JrawX / Talk / Contribs
The Template:BLP primary sources tag has been sitting on top of this article for a good few months now, but I don't think it's been an accurate assessment for a long while. There were legitimate reasons for adding it back when the article was put up for FAC, but the sourcing issues brought up then have since been addressed. I'd like to remove the tag myself, but as the main contributer to this article, that would probably not be appropriate without at least a talk page discussion. If there aren't any objections brought up within the next few weeks, I'll probably just go and WP:BOLDly remove it myself, since this has been really bugging me and my slightly OCD tendencies. Yitz (talk) 06:28, 10 December 2021 (UTC)