Good articleJoshua Ilustre has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starJoshua Ilustre is part of the Guam at the 2016 Summer Olympics series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 28, 2018Good article nomineeListed
July 6, 2018Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Joshua Ilustre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 18 January 2022).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:10, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Joshua Ilustre/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 14:48, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Going to review this article. MWright96 (talk) 14:48, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Biography

2016 Summer Olympics

Post-Olympics

References

That is all the quibbles I noticed during my read-through. None of these should be of too much difficulty to correct. MWright96 (talk) 15:17, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@MWright96: I only fixed one of them, someone else snagged the rest (thanks!), so I think it is all good now. Kees08 (Talk) 21:16, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]