Article (edit | visual edit | history ) · Article talk (edit | history ) · Watch
Reviewer: Muffin Wizard (talk · contribs ) 11:18, 23 April 2015 (UTC) [ reply ]
I will do a review on this article as soon as possible, but please be patient. :)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)It is reasonably well written .
a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar) : b (MoS for lead , layout , word choice , fiction , and lists) :
Good.
It is factually accurate and verifiable .
a (reference section ) : b (citations to reliable sources ) : c (OR ) :
All references used are reliable sources , seems fine.
It is broad in its coverage .
a (major aspects ) : b (focused ) :
Good.
It follows the neutral point of view policy .
Fair representation without bias :
Seems neutral.
It is stable .
No edit wars, etc. :
Seems fine, I see no edit war.
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales ) : b (appropriate use with suitable captions ) :
I see all images are available freely to use.
Overall : After a frequent more check to the article, I see there is no more problem, so I give it a passed, thanks for all your time to work on this article. :)
Pass/Fail :