This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Since the exact mass of both Kepler-1708b and Kepler-1708bI are very poorly defined, the centre of mass for the two could well be outside either and as such that they could share an orbital axis external to both planetary bodies. So, should they not also qualify as a candidate double planet? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.153.209.239 (talk) 21:04, 18 January 2022 (UTC)