GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Laguna Fire (1993)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 04:47, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Looking good with copy changes made. Will pass. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 17:31, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know? If you fancy doing so, I always have plenty of GA nominees to review. Just look for the all-uppercase titles in the Television section. Reviews always appreciated.

Copy changes

[edit]
 Done - sentence rephrased slightly in such a way as to remove the comma Penitentes (talk) 22:06, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Done - removed
 Done - removed
 Done - space added
 Done - italicized, wikilinked
 Done - switched
 Done - added

Sourcing and spot checks

[edit]

The article cites the firestorm report 24 times.

It's an invaluable reference for the article but perhaps I use it as a crutch too much. I'll start combing through to see if more statements solely sourced to it can be attributed to secondary sources. Penitentes (talk) 22:06, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Penitentes I got busy but this was actually going to be for spot checks specific to that report. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 17:18, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Images

[edit]

All three images come from Orange County Archives which offered them as cc-by-2.0. No concerns here. Alt text present.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.