This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Women scientists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Biased[edit]

The article reads to me as if it was written by a pr-agency, for example

list of awards and honors that awkwardly dominates the article
"Her three children have given her eight grandchildren. All three children have become successful doctors. [...] All the children and grandchildren have a great love of music which they inherited from their maternal ancestors [...]" - — Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:(({1))}|(({1))}]] ([[User talk:(({1))}|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/(({1))}|contribs]])
- It should be noted that Dr. New's supposed research into "homosexuality" was actually a long-term follow-up study on the psychological effects of the prenatal dexamethasone regimen. Dr. New received NIH funding for this research through the rare disease program. [[1]] She has an almost unique cohort of patients and the opportunity to conduct such research with a cohort large enough to allow for statistical analysis might not arise again soon. Prenatal dexamethasone remains an important tool for treating the physical abnormalities associated with CAH, and her long-term follow up of the psychological effects provides important data about the safety of the treatment. Dr. New has never recommended prenatal dexamethasone for use for psychological/social purposes. Pengolodhlerner (talk) 19:33, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This assertion is not true. Here is something that she and Nimkarn saw published in 2010 (my highlights):

Without prenatal therapy, masculinization of external genitalia in females is potentially devastating. It carries the risk of wrong sex assignment at birth, difficult reconstructive surgery, and subsequent long-term effects on quality of life. Gender-related behaviors, namely childhood play, peer association, career and leisure time preferences in adolescence and adulthood, maternalism, aggression, and sexual orientation become musculinized in 46,XX girls and women with 21OHD deficiency. [...] We anticipate that prenatal dexamethasone therapy will reduce the well-documented behavioral masculinization and difficulties related to reconstructive surgeries.

^[1]

- Also, if you check the history, you will see that I wrote much of the article, and I assure you I am not a PR agency. I have moved the awards section to the end of the article in order to facilitate readability. Pengolodhlerner (talk) 19:51, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I've documented a number of instances of editorializing (and removed one instance in the lead). With Alice Dreger's new book out, Galileo's Middle Finger, you can imagine that this page will receive much more scrutiny, and it doesn't look good for Wikipedia that it (1) not only fails to reflect the controversy associated with the concerns raised about New's work (from Dan Savage's popular concerns, the NIH vs Cornell lawsuit, and the Time story on 'A Prenatal Treatment Raises Questions of Medical Ethics') but that it (2) has so many flattery words. -Reagle (talk) 11:39, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The book of Dreger is indeed interesting and she spends 3 chapters on the prenatal dexamethasone subject. So I concur with (1) in the above that it doesn't look good, if Wikipedia does not refer to that. (Although the Times article is quoted and referred in the first paragraph, strangely enough). Pjtverheijen (talk) 22:21, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with these comments, and would add that numerous WP:Peacock terms are used inappropriately throughout the article. Trankuility (talk) 19:42, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Nimkarn, Saroj; New, Maria I. (April 2010). "Congenital adrenal hyperplasia due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency". Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1192 (1): 5–11. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.05225.x. ISSN 1749-6632. ((cite journal)): |access-date= requires |url= (help)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Maria New. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130516204243/http://www.endocrinology.org/about/medals/SfEpastMedalists.pdf to http://www.endocrinology.org/about/medals/SfEpastMedalists.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template ((source check)) (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:43, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Maria New. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:58, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]