This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia This page is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This page is supported by the science and academia work group. Women's History This page is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles Science This page is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience articles Women This page is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles Women scientists This page is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles

To-do list for Wikipedia:WikiProject Women scientists: edit · history · watch · refresh · Updated 2018-09-21 Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : see Articles to be created Citing sources : List of female scientists before the 21st century, Women in computing, Women in science, Rachel Carson, Marie Curie, Nicola Pellow Cleanup : Women in science Stubs : Women in geology Verify : Rosalind Franklin, Margaret Burbidge, Francine Berman, Christiane Nüsslein-Volhard, Karen Uhlenbeck Other : Finkbeiner test (notability), Cécile Vogt-Mugnier (assessment), Emmy Noether (support nomination to be included in Wikipedia_talk:Vital_articles), Bette Korber nominated for good article and needs reviewerLLMHoopes (talk) 16:47, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

This article has been mentioned by a media organization: Jenny Singer (2021-01-26). "The Women of Wikipedia Are Writing Themselves Into History". Glamour (magazine). [Temple-Wood] called it the Fuck You Project, which became the Women Scientists WikiProject.

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4

Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived.

Jimbo likes the idea of paying editors to write about female scientists from third world countries.[1]

		Welcome to Women in Red's May 2018 worldwide online editathons. File:Soraya Aghaee4.jpg New: "Women of the Sea" New: "Villains" New: "Women in Sports" New: "Central Eastern European women" Continuing: #1day1woman Global Initiative
		(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

Having worked for 2 years editing articles for Women In Red, a group of organizers have concluded that sourcing is one of the biggest hurdles in creating articles on women and non-binary genders. Though it is true that a lot of sourcing simply doesn’t exist, it is also true that there are sources, but we have no access to them. As these groups did not typically become subjects for academic study until the 1970s, many of the sources are not on line or are behind paywalls. Failure to include women and non-binary people in the encyclopedia presents a one-dimensional view of society and history. To address those issues, we are forming a new User Group aimed at referencing and support for like-minded groups and would appreciate your input or input from your supporters in our organizational process. See link: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wiki_Women_in_Red MauraWen (talk) 09:25 10 July 2018 (UTC)

We are delighted to share with you that the #SheSaid Campaign will be running again this year and you are invited to participate in Oct/Nov 2021.The goal is to celebrate notable women and add more entries on Wikiquote. Please have a look at some of the cool bookmarks we have completed and ready for you to print if you wish to do so. If you would like to have the editable version of the bookmark please contact me at Shoodho , visit some sample of bookmarks here:Bookmarks.For more information, please visit the campaign page here:SheSaid page If you have any questions or query please feel free to contact Islahaddow, Anthere or Shoodho.

Kind regards, Shoodho

I recently moved a section from Crystallography#Contribution of women to X-ray crystallography to X-ray crystallography#Contribution of women to X-ray crystallography. Additions/edits welcome, particularly as both pages are really short on sources in this and many other areas. (I am slowly trying to repair them.) Ldm1954 (talk) 19:22, 6 December 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Discussion on if something she wrote on Instagram should be mentioned in the article. It's Gaza-war related, your opinion is welcome at Talk:Mika_Tosca#She_no_longer_works_at_SAIC. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:27, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I have nominated Emmy Noether for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Z1720 (talk) 20:31, 15 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women in Red#Paper on women economists may be of interest to people, given Women Scientists are mentioned. -Kj cheetham (talk) 13:45, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Marian Breland Bailey has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Spinixster (chat!) 10:09, 5 February 2024 (UTC)Reply[reply]